Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Israel-Hamas War: "Enough Of The Bigotry Against Palestinians!" Piers Morgan vs Cenk Uygur" video.

  1. His argument was incoherent and illogical. It was unpacked to sound like typical naive leftism. Which is all that it was. It could have been written by Saul Alinsky. It's boilerplate bad faith Marxism. They hate "nationalism" of all kinds. They don't care if the Palestinians get their own sovereign state. Marxists want to showcase "the struggle" and have victims to show. Marxists love ongoing wars. Marxists in the CCP for example love Russia and Ukraine battling it out and wasting resources while showing the futility of going against the CCP "Vanguard Party" status as the top Marxist political party in the globe. It's the same reason China appears to both support and condemn every side of every war. While making sure none run out of weapons. And yes, Marxists have run agencies of the US government. Their oath was to the USA so they thought it was OK to fight "Russian Communism" while expanding their own unconstitutional powers through fearmongering and so forth. Cenk's view is not difficult to understand. It's difficult to support because it's childishly explained and actually quite delusional. Cent probably does not know that his form of rhetoric is boilerplate agitation propaganda as taught by Saul Alinsky in Rules for Radicals. Well yeah, of course if "special forces" can magically do all of this that would be great. Notice when ISIS had civilian captives as hostages it was only a few in number. And they did not capture them en masse while slaughtering even more. ISIS must now be regarded as relatively humane in comparison to the new uber-terrorists calling themselves HAMAS. But let's look at how ISIS was handled. They were tracked for months and years. The hostages were rescued one by one in most cases and the special operators had to wait for just the right time to accomplish their mission. ISIS did not hide amongst innocent civilians and the hostages were so few in number they could be focused on one at a time. This situation is unlike any other. This would be like Nazi Germany in the middle of WWII sending out film of the concentration/death camps in order to taunt everyone. And we still had to carpet bomb Germany to win WWII without having any verified intelligence on the camps. We only new about the "lawful" POW camps. Imagine if the Nazis kept the POW next to the Jews they slaughtered and sent out newsreel films. That's what HAMAS has done. And the Nazis had real world objectives. Killing Jews was not the literal centerpiece of their operations. Nothing like this has ever happened before. There is no playbook for this. The closest one would be war with Nazi Germany where everyone in the "liberal democracies" wanted them to be bombed in to the next world. They didn't like that civilians would be killed but there were no other options. No magic "special forces" or "AI drones" with Social Justice lasers like we have.
    1
  2. Do you disagree with any of Cenk's "points"?
    1
  3.  @healsonmepls2626  Yeah, I mean we in the USA always have the choice of controlling the timeline. Cenk and other Marxists like Saul Alinsky are programmed to talk about the USA like it is all powerful and only cares about power to acquire wealth and protect it's "top domain capitalist" status. If you start with those unquestionable dogmas, all of your stories should begin with "in theory" and then you list your assumptions if you want to be honest. He is not intellectually honest because he wasn't educated to worry about intellectual honesty. He was educated to always pose as de facto "oppressed" and therefore more authoritative voice to "speak for oppressed communities". It's textbook French Jacobinism but with Marxist dogmas to make it "universal".
    1