Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on ""Why Won't You Call Hamas Terrorists?" Piers Morgan vs Jeremy Corbyn Debate On Palestine And Israel" video.

  1. 6
  2. 1
  3. The definition of sovereign is "not subject to outside influence". Sovereign nations go to the UN to negotiate. OK. Now when you talk about "human rights" the sovereigns are the ones that control "the rights" of their citizens and subjects. If Israel is providing utilities to Gaza but Gaza (or its de facto rulers) are at war, how can Israel fight the hostile actors while extending "human rights" to the same polity? This in and of itself is highly problematic and should have been contemplated long before roque terror organizations got rooted in. But anyway, you can only talk about "rights" and "justice" within a single judicial system, one by one. For Israel to extend "human rights" to Gaza means they must submit to the same judicial system. Or the sovereign of Gaza must enter in to a treaty that allows interaction with the courts. Like Canada and the US have. Talking about the morality of this or that is a totally different conversation and couching it in "human rights" terms is inherently fallacious and itself unjust because it implies that "power" has "obligations" in accordance with some universal system that none of you can even define or contemplate realistically. In my relatively short life time all academic institutions in the West have gotten increasingly more delusional and arrogant. Stupid, closed minded and utterly self-righteous in their chaotic arrogance. And by the way, if the Palestinian Authority was established as the sovereign of the territory being fought over they would have a security treaty and would join together to purge the terrorists as a "law enforcement" operation. Asking to "Free Palestine" without understanding how that can really happen while talking about "Freedom Fighting" Hamas terrorists is just arsonists posing as fire fighters. Actually, only cheerleaders. And all of the Westerners promising "Human Rights" for Palestinian national liberation don't distinguish between the Palestinian vision and their own. The whole "trans rights" insanity is about Marxists getting nations to destroy themselves from within and while you're all doing that you're pretending to support "Palestinian national liberation" but you're not serious at all when you pretend to have some opinion on "human rights". Hamas and the PA must make peace with each other and with Jordan and Egypt. Or the PA must eliminate Hamas, with or without outside help. And all of these insane Western diplomats and talking heads need to get a grip about, well, everything. Start with the fundamentals and a knowledge about how "rights" developed in the West. I think very few of you have any clue whatsoever because almost everyone I talk to can't separate fact from fantasy about the status quo nor their Utopian delusions about what is realistic to expect. You have to study the Peace of Westphalia as the model for international relations and "human rights" on a completely different track under the development of "due process" in the Western tradition. If you have no clear vision of universal standards for due process you have no idea what "rights" even means. You're all just confusing yourselves and your audience.
    1
  4. 1