Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "NBC News" channel.

  1.  @seancrane8880  Name a moderate Democrat that's in Congress today. Anyone that voted yes on the so called "Inflation Reduction Act" has disqualified himself from "moderate" status.
    3
  2. LOL. Do you know how hard it is to get a law degree, never mind in "grading on the curve" colleges? Sitting in Congress is not hard. And a college degree MIGHT help you deal with pompous "expert witnesses" but it's hardly needed. Congress needs to communicate to the public in clear language, not like agenda-driven (and often very low IQ) lawyers. Communicating with the public according to the "reasonable man" standard is what lawyers are supposed to understand best. But they generally do not these days. Not in my lifetime. They were raised on "Community Truth" (from Marxist Critical Theory) where each victim group needs Prog-splanations. IOW, politically correct drivel that helps nobody.
    2
  3.  @Bernard-fo2qo  She only gets the job if Biden resigns from office or the convention awards the party nomination to her. You're confused. If Biden resigns only from the nomination she gets nothing. If he resigns from office she becomes President but not the automatic party nominee.
    2
  4.  @walterpierce6061  Manchin knows this. Manchin says he was inspired by JFK to get involved in politics. JFK was one of only two decent Democratic Party Presidents in the USA and you still haven't figured it out.
    2
  5. They can submit anything that they want to in the Senate. They can throw toilet paper rolls at each other like House Democrats do. Maybe hold a Pizza Sit In (AKA "Insurrection"). Or pull fire alarms. Anything goes. There's no judge to stop them.
    2
  6.  @ashinkei  Pscyho, why can't you explain your dogmatic claim? All you have is childish "social media" tropes. Of course, you can call me fascist for the simple reason that the Marxist definition for fascist is anyone that "reacts against" Communism. It doesn't bother me when you continuously say stupid things. The more stupid claims you make and the more I explain them and the better for everyone involved. Carry on.
    2
  7. @furbysmith3240 Spot the irony in your own comment.
    2
  8. The problem is that Chinese Communists don't even recognize human development as an individual thing. They believe in central plans, compliance, and historical materialism, which means that when the central plan delivers great enough GDP that will give them enough power. If they don't decide to "defend" the "international workers" in ever larger spheres along the way by abusing more and more workers in the name of Social Justice.
    1
  9.  @DrSbaitsojr  You have no idea what motivates Russia. Russia is caught between the so called "liberal democracies" and the CCP. Check out a map for once. NATO is not an actual threat to Russia and Russia knows this. But at the same time Russia feels pressure to control more area to the seas and oceans away from being encircled by China and China's "democratic" Belt and Road economic/military imperialism. This doesn't put Russia at the top of our list of friends. But it's not at the top of the list of enemies either.
    1
  10. Doctors are lying about what?
    1
  11.  @johnf3442  LMFAO. You don't even know what fascist means.
    1
  12.  @johnf3442  As suspected, you have no idea what it means nor do you even know how to use a dictionary to prove anything.
    1
  13. Manchin and RFK know this. They're trying to tell you that the US Democratic Party is broken.
    1
  14. @@Victor-ek1fw You guys get all of your news and analysis from fiction writers. Hopefully you'll figure this out one day.
    1
  15. @@Victor-ek1fw What a braindead comment from "Victor". Is your English strong enough to ask a question like an adult? Because everything I mentioned that involves "a case" has a title that you can use to search for yourself and or ask a clearer question. Where did you go to school, or did you?
    1
  16. @@Victor-ek1fw "Sadly, I think most Republicans will be happy to have Santos as speaker. " <- A claim with zero reasoning, never mind evidence. "Some older Republicans may not be so happy with a brown man as speaker, but as long as they think they are sticking it up to Biden, they will go along, even celebrate." <-- That stupid musing is called a trope. It's also delusional and represents only your feelings that developed through gossip with other braindead Marxists such as yourself. "I am not so sure that Santos will not be reelected. His district is something else, like Alabama but dumber." <-- More braindead tropes involving blatant Freudian projection as well.
    1
  17.  @walterpierce6061  LOL. I think you're both wrong. The difference is that I can explain it all to you. I don't rely on silly mantras. Why on earth would you even consider any US Democratic Party politician? They have been destroying the US Federal government since Andrew Jackson. The only decent US Democratic Party Presidents were Truman and JFK. All of the others were various iterations of Jacobins and Marxists trying to come across as "democratic" when equal application of the law has always terrified them. Look around the country and show me a US Democratic Party leader that is actually dedicated to equal application of the law. Do you even understand what Critical Theory is?
    1
  18. US "democracy" happens in each State and in the House of Representatives. The so-called two-party system is just a cultural thing. And there are more than two parties. It's just that so many, such as yourself, have been duped in to believing corporate leftism. If you don't like the US Constitution, you should probably move to a country with a Parliamentary system that you prefer. It's abject nonsense to talk about the USA going back to the system that they clearly saw the flaws in when they created the US Constitution.
    1
  19.  @Jcrlsb227  Maybe you'll be in prison. Are you in prison right now? I'm not sure what the joke is from you clowns.
    1
  20. "Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress."
    1
  21. Right. Jordan is investigating the guy that was under suspicion for bribery and treason when Trump made a "phone call" that led to that first Impeachment. That suspect then got special protections or "political Teflon" from your cult and sits in the Oval Office. You guys are amazingly ignorant. Because you could actually follow the indisputable evidence as it is published and then you'd understand a lot better why US Democrats are considered to be low IQ treasonous Marxists. Even the CCP recognizes that you're all being (easily) manipulated to vote for the destruction of your own nation's industrial base and energy production.
    1
  22.  @Butterflies-are-free  Indicted for treason based on what evidence? Do you understand my question or do you need to ask a Marxist lawyer for his mendacious opinion?
    1
  23.  @elmosweed4985  Citing accusations as somehow authoritative is the ultimate in mendacity. Do you know how basic logic works? You could look up the case evidence. If you had a well developed mind, well enough to sit on a jury, you could engage in public conversations with people about publicly available case evidence. US Democrats NEVER show this kind of thinking. The ones that do end up leaving the party and then openly protesting all of the US Democratic Party's well known corruption and bad faith politicking.
    1
  24.  @nonyabusiness1990  You obviously don't know anything that is true about Joe Biden or the US Democratic Party.
    1
  25. What exactly do you think "indigenous rights" means?
    1
  26.  @michaelruggiero9065  That's an elementary school agitprop trope.
    1
  27. Divided Republicans is good for the party and the republic. It's the "reach across" Republicans that are destroying the nation with the (US) Soviet Marxist Democratic Party. Do you think Congress is a Social Justice Legislation factory?
    1
  28.  @777dragonborn  LOL. Look up "Hispanic" in a decent dictionary. His·pan·ic /hiˈspanik/ from Latin Hispanicus, from Hispania ‘Spain’.
    1
  29.  @citlalie9791  Huh? How do you know what anyone else's "genealogy" shows? Hispanics are, if the label is at all accurate, united by a connection with Spain.
    1
  30.  @jobbailon2951  Europeans brought law, idiot. There was no law in America before the British came to America. There's arguably still no law in Mexico, though a lot of folks like to pretend that there is. They have "legal institutions" but no rule of law.
    1
  31. These people have no idea how to run even a small business, never mind what they call "Our Democracy".
    1
  32. Reach across Marxists. Otherwise known as Fabianist Marxists. Or "Managed Decline" Marxists that lie just as aggressively as your Democratic Party Marxists but argue for lower corporate tax rates. LOL. Put Jeffries in as House Speaker. Go ahead if you want to provoke a reaction from the anti-Marxist citizens.
    1
  33.  @Jcrlsb227  Why?
    1
  34.  @walterpierce6061  LOL. So, you're a KKK Marxist? That makes sense. You must be at least 70 years old and a lifelong "Progressive" racist. I always give credit where it's due. You love the worst racist Presidents of the post WWII era. Give honorable mention to Jimmy Carter and bolster your "Social Score".
    1
  35. Do you even know what dictator means in politics?
    1
  36. @imgonnastealyourgirl You're not an American. OK. But you accept stupid "insurrection" talking points as fact. What does that say about you? Don't you know how to use a freaking English dictionary for "big words"?
    1
  37.  @mcdaniels6188  Subpoenas are not magical documents. Saying it came from "the House" even if it had a majority vote does not make it enforceable under the law. I'm not sure any House majority (vote) can ever be used to subpoena one of its own members. For a House subpoena to be enforceable (supported by the judiciary) it would have to be something related to Impeachment. Otherwise it would need to be referred to the US DOJ because that's basically how or legal system works. If the House sends out a subpoena in its own authority that basically implies the "threat of enforcement" can come from a vote to open Impeachment hearings and then an enforceable subpoena can be issued by the House. The January 6 Committee could not issue any legitimate subpoenas because the clear goal was simply to create some demand for the US DOJ to figure out "reasons" to start arresting people. There's no way, ever, that any Congress member will ever get arrested for lawful debate and in the chamber. You people are so, so ignorant. You defame our nation and our founders with ignorant gossip.
    1
  38. We know what pleases braindead Marxists: Braindead puppets for elected office.
    1
  39.  @BurkBernard  Your dogmatic claim is just as deranged as anyone claiming (dogmatically) that Trump won because nobody has investigated any of the questionable ballot integrity problems. None of you dogmatic fools are smart at all.
    1
  40.  @jlvandat69  You can't actually define "pro-democracy" because our "democracy" is defined in the US Constitution. And you whackjobs consistently fail to understand anything about how it actually works nor do you come up with any rational suggestions to make it 'more democratic' or any changes at all other than placing Marxist judges in power so that they can "decree" their way to your blissful Utopian Marxist republic. But Marxism itself is anything but democratic. Come on. Where is your mind when you come up with silly comments like this?
    1
  41.  @mlynx6386  That's not how success is measured for people not obsessed with Machiavellian "democracy".
    1
  42.  @TheTrishalyn  This is called Freudian projection and straight up irony.
    1
  43.  @DS-qz2gu  The Joint Session voted to accept the States' Electors and therefore Biden was lawfully sworn in. This is not news.
    1
  44.  rational-public-discourse  Strong moderate means what?
    1
  45.  @lonnietaylor2759  Did you look at ANY case evidence? Do you even comprehend what I asked you in the first sentence of this comment?
    1
  46. It was obvious from the first Impeachment that if they had anything at all against Trump they would have used it. Think about this: They Impeached Trump for investigating Biden. The one that has now been exposed through his son's video blogs and emails (that the FBI had at the time of the Impeachment). If Trump had been the actual criminal wouldn't they have used the evidence of that? This cult has destroyed the US DOJ. Even going back to Jams Comey before and after he got fired it was obvious that these people were triggered maniacs. They had the full power of the NSA and the "Intelligence Community" along with all of the legitimate tools to investigate and prosecute anyone. What did they come up with? They're insane. How can anyone defends this depraved party of criminals and expect to be taken seriously? And it's not just that they don't care about the law because Biden is going to do wonders for people. He's destroying the economy and economic freedom all around the world in collaboration with the CCP. All based on Progressive (Fabian) Marxist theories.
    1
  47. You like Communism? Clear picture of what's going on? LOL.
    1
  48. You dehumanize the ones that have the competence to restore the rule of law because you fear it. You crave your cult's single-party rule but fail to even understand what you're yearning for.
    1