Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Who will be the next speaker? Steve Kornacki runs the tally after Jordan's failed vote" video.

  1.  @seancrane8880  Name a moderate Democrat that's in Congress today. Anyone that voted yes on the so called "Inflation Reduction Act" has disqualified himself from "moderate" status.
    3
  2. LOL. Do you know how hard it is to get a law degree, never mind in "grading on the curve" colleges? Sitting in Congress is not hard. And a college degree MIGHT help you deal with pompous "expert witnesses" but it's hardly needed. Congress needs to communicate to the public in clear language, not like agenda-driven (and often very low IQ) lawyers. Communicating with the public according to the "reasonable man" standard is what lawyers are supposed to understand best. But they generally do not these days. Not in my lifetime. They were raised on "Community Truth" (from Marxist Critical Theory) where each victim group needs Prog-splanations. IOW, politically correct drivel that helps nobody.
    2
  3. @furbysmith3240 Spot the irony in your own comment.
    2
  4. @@Victor-ek1fw You guys get all of your news and analysis from fiction writers. Hopefully you'll figure this out one day.
    1
  5. @@Victor-ek1fw What a braindead comment from "Victor". Is your English strong enough to ask a question like an adult? Because everything I mentioned that involves "a case" has a title that you can use to search for yourself and or ask a clearer question. Where did you go to school, or did you?
    1
  6. @@Victor-ek1fw "Sadly, I think most Republicans will be happy to have Santos as speaker. " <- A claim with zero reasoning, never mind evidence. "Some older Republicans may not be so happy with a brown man as speaker, but as long as they think they are sticking it up to Biden, they will go along, even celebrate." <-- That stupid musing is called a trope. It's also delusional and represents only your feelings that developed through gossip with other braindead Marxists such as yourself. "I am not so sure that Santos will not be reelected. His district is something else, like Alabama but dumber." <-- More braindead tropes involving blatant Freudian projection as well.
    1
  7. Right. Jordan is investigating the guy that was under suspicion for bribery and treason when Trump made a "phone call" that led to that first Impeachment. That suspect then got special protections or "political Teflon" from your cult and sits in the Oval Office. You guys are amazingly ignorant. Because you could actually follow the indisputable evidence as it is published and then you'd understand a lot better why US Democrats are considered to be low IQ treasonous Marxists. Even the CCP recognizes that you're all being (easily) manipulated to vote for the destruction of your own nation's industrial base and energy production.
    1
  8.  @Butterflies-are-free  Indicted for treason based on what evidence? Do you understand my question or do you need to ask a Marxist lawyer for his mendacious opinion?
    1
  9.  @elmosweed4985  Citing accusations as somehow authoritative is the ultimate in mendacity. Do you know how basic logic works? You could look up the case evidence. If you had a well developed mind, well enough to sit on a jury, you could engage in public conversations with people about publicly available case evidence. US Democrats NEVER show this kind of thinking. The ones that do end up leaving the party and then openly protesting all of the US Democratic Party's well known corruption and bad faith politicking.
    1
  10.  @nonyabusiness1990  You obviously don't know anything that is true about Joe Biden or the US Democratic Party.
    1
  11. Divided Republicans is good for the party and the republic. It's the "reach across" Republicans that are destroying the nation with the (US) Soviet Marxist Democratic Party. Do you think Congress is a Social Justice Legislation factory?
    1
  12. Reach across Marxists. Otherwise known as Fabianist Marxists. Or "Managed Decline" Marxists that lie just as aggressively as your Democratic Party Marxists but argue for lower corporate tax rates. LOL. Put Jeffries in as House Speaker. Go ahead if you want to provoke a reaction from the anti-Marxist citizens.
    1
  13. @imgonnastealyourgirl You're not an American. OK. But you accept stupid "insurrection" talking points as fact. What does that say about you? Don't you know how to use a freaking English dictionary for "big words"?
    1
  14.  @mcdaniels6188  Subpoenas are not magical documents. Saying it came from "the House" even if it had a majority vote does not make it enforceable under the law. I'm not sure any House majority (vote) can ever be used to subpoena one of its own members. For a House subpoena to be enforceable (supported by the judiciary) it would have to be something related to Impeachment. Otherwise it would need to be referred to the US DOJ because that's basically how or legal system works. If the House sends out a subpoena in its own authority that basically implies the "threat of enforcement" can come from a vote to open Impeachment hearings and then an enforceable subpoena can be issued by the House. The January 6 Committee could not issue any legitimate subpoenas because the clear goal was simply to create some demand for the US DOJ to figure out "reasons" to start arresting people. There's no way, ever, that any Congress member will ever get arrested for lawful debate and in the chamber. You people are so, so ignorant. You defame our nation and our founders with ignorant gossip.
    1
  15. We know what pleases braindead Marxists: Braindead puppets for elected office.
    1
  16.  @BurkBernard  Your dogmatic claim is just as deranged as anyone claiming (dogmatically) that Trump won because nobody has investigated any of the questionable ballot integrity problems. None of you dogmatic fools are smart at all.
    1
  17.  @jlvandat69  You can't actually define "pro-democracy" because our "democracy" is defined in the US Constitution. And you whackjobs consistently fail to understand anything about how it actually works nor do you come up with any rational suggestions to make it 'more democratic' or any changes at all other than placing Marxist judges in power so that they can "decree" their way to your blissful Utopian Marxist republic. But Marxism itself is anything but democratic. Come on. Where is your mind when you come up with silly comments like this?
    1
  18.  @mlynx6386  That's not how success is measured for people not obsessed with Machiavellian "democracy".
    1
  19.  @TheTrishalyn  This is called Freudian projection and straight up irony.
    1
  20.  @DS-qz2gu  The Joint Session voted to accept the States' Electors and therefore Biden was lawfully sworn in. This is not news.
    1
  21.  rational-public-discourse  Strong moderate means what?
    1
  22.  @lonnietaylor2759  Did you look at ANY case evidence? Do you even comprehend what I asked you in the first sentence of this comment?
    1