General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Business Basics
comments

Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Business Basics" channel.

That used to seem weird to hear how people "succeed...under tremendous racism" but the trope is spreading like wildfire.
29
Starting wars is not hard. That doesn't make it smart.
26
@DailyGPT365 You can find arrogance everywhere, including in your own comment. So what?
18
@marlonyo You're talking with one of the paid liars.
18
@Sparta1993 How silly.
17
@rufanuf1 Give me some examples of idiots in the free world. Just call them Marxists or come up with a better explanation.
8
@Squared_Table The Communists have total control over mainland China. They only barely maintain control over the USA under "Commanding Heights" Leninism and could lose power this November. Your question is ignorant even if under the cover of sarcasm.
7
@Tripper42024 You don't see any silly comments? Strategic lying is fundamental to Marxism, for sure. But that is not the silly comment I replied to.
7
@aranmnj8567 That's a factor but it's also important that sending gear to vassal states to test out is also important to validate this same gear. IOW, get the balance wrong and you end up relying on too many untested performance expectations.
7
@tiegangli220 People only started buying cheap garbage from China about 20 years ago. And as others have pointed out India is perfectly positioned to take up any slack of the USA and or Europe suddenly remember that it's a bad idea to make imperialist Communist regimes rich. Good wool or silk socks have always been expensive and cotton or polyester socks have always been cheap.
6
@markus-ks9sf Which part is hysterical and how about you go ahead and rectify his supposed fallacies?
5
@mpcf8 Puerto Rico already has elections. And Cuba already has Chinese bases closer to the continental US States than Puerto Rico. You're comparing a "democratic" nation with lots of Marxists already in power against a totalitarian Communist dictatorship that only ever held party-elite "elections" and so forth. You're trying to imply that both are equally hypocritical because both conduct similar or the same kinds of international relations. And can you name one time when the US charged the host nation for its military bases that are put there by bilateral treaties? What usually happens is that the host nation usually requests training and gear and then are asked to buy for the additional gear that will operate under the host nations' flag. The CCP's expansionism starts with agreements to mine material wealth and then offers to finance improvements to its sea ports where the CCP is also the project developer/contractor. And the negotiate "rights" to control the ports and when happens if the host nation can't keep up the payments?
4
@MestizoMoney They obviously don't.
4
@ProudFilthyCasual I think our friend up there is obsessed with Opium for the same reason Hunter is obsessed with crack.
4
Israel does some of the best tech development. And even allies spy on each other but are supposed to ask if they take engineering IP.
4
@adr2t You can't get premium socks from China at a discount. I don't know of anyone that buys fine apparel from China. Hong Kong doesn't count because the only people that bought clothing there were getting custom tailored and the discount wasn't that impressive for what they got. Indonesian tailors are pretty good, actually. But if you want the best "Western" tailored apparel you have to go to the US or England. With fabrics from Italy. That's where your stuff comes from if you're buying high end socks and want to dress like Donald Trump.
4
@davidmoore5004 It doesn't work quite like that.
4
@pugilist102 There are not too many examples of long term colonial or military occupations succeeding.
4
@Mikewee777 Nope. Its military + industrial. And the complex also includes the permanent US bureaucracy.
4
@marijnnn4992 I think they still call it the British Commonwealth. I see they now call it the Commonwealth of Nations. Commonwealth is kind of an archaic term. A commonwealth is similar to a republic but it's OK to have a monarch as long as you have an elected legislature. That's what I see they all have in common. I think this dates back to the Orange Revolution where the English Parliament went to war with Charles I and killed him with the intention of abolishing the monarchy in the UK. When Parliament reestablished the monarchy they also established a new balance of power with basically unlimited powers to legislate and in fact to recall and get rid of any future monarch by majority vote. Commonwealth originally meant something like public good. The monarchy did not give up its lands and wealth so it retained its own but at the same time Parliament could also run its budget for "the public good". In reality the difference between a true republic and a commonwealth is private property rights and particularly mineral rights associated with private land ownership. From a PR point of view, republic harkens back to the Roman Republic and "commonwealth" harkens back to the Orange Revolution I already mentioned. And some US States fashion themselves as republics and others as commonwealths. The Commonwealth of Nation implies that the overarching group has some collective sovereignty on its own and this is because many of them have on paper the British Monarch has having some kind of role in the nation's existence.
3
@acarnivorouscat4549 Underestimating what?
3
@deanv378 These kooks don't understand how anything works.
3
@mpcf8 Who did they take it from?
3
@bl1429 War does not make money. War can help one group extract wealth for itself while destroying masses of it.
3
@-TheOracle- Their relationship with Google is even more important than it is with Apple.
3
@ma.2099 Right. But at the same time, all of these conflicts are "political" and not really in response to existential threats. We ended WWII by occupying Germany and Japan. That went pretty well. The Communists continued bad faith dealings with the USA and Truman responded with "UN consensus" to sort of act like the world was divided into two empires. So in some sense when we act out with silly explanations (not even seriously explaining our purpose to the Citizen voters) then we become unstable and untrustworthy any time we act beyond a clear, ratified treaty. All of the wars since WWII were wars of choice and to be honest, the only nation we clearly had a duty to destroy (militarily) was Japan. And that is really the only one that turned in to a lasting, healthy treaty. There's a lesson in there that nobody wants to hear for some reason. I blame academic Marxists in "Western" schools. One of the lessons is that culturally, Europe is a wreck and they have not moved smoothly in to "democracy" because too few of the nations really transformed from monarchy to some form of rule-of-law democracy. And US politicians half of the time want to turn the US in to a "republic" governed by "deep state" institutions in the style of the late monarchies of Europe.
3
@luxurypetscz The CCP (and also Western socialists) loves it when "Capitalists" have never ending wars of attrition when they increase and centrally consolidate global share of "means of production". It's intended that it never ends until Westphalian nationalism itself is ended.
3
@alhambrabiker1476 Nobody is above the law? We're talking about international relations. Relations between nations, not persons. There is no actual "law" as in "the rule of law" because there is no international judiciary, no international elections to elect international legislators, etc. And the comment you replied to was dumb in the first place. Why double down on stupid smack talk?
3
@tr7938 Iran is nothing without Russia. See how it works?
3
@kalb390 Where do you live that you don't GAF if you're bombed?
3
@stevev4863 Over what period?
2
@damocles8417 In the US we call them Marines and the Marines have their own pilots and dedicated aircraft.
2
@damocles8417 LOL. You're a genius. Didn't take you long to get halfway there.
2
The global version is banned in China. Imagine that.
2
@user-wj6jh1cd5n Written in the legal code is not "in the law itself". This gibberish is meaningless because there is no legal framework for them to defend these supposed rights.
2
@Apollorion Eurasia is one continent.
2
 @Mehwhatevr What never happened?
2
@DanielDeBenoit And even that is debatable.
2
@RobertoChavez5-j3o "Originally, they didn't necessarily want to break free from England, they just wanted more respect than they got and they want to vote." There were not very many hive-minders back then. The hiveminders write history books and teach history, badly. And the ones that did not want to break from the king are now called Canadians. They were originally called royalists, just as the French during their revolution and the formation of their new governing paradigms.
2
BRIC or BRICS.
2
The CCP has already partnered with American drug cartels. I guess you didn't hear about the CCP-Mexican fentanyl racket.
1
@301BOYSWP Correct. Understanding Communism is the first step in defending freedom. Some today think Russia is the villain and China the victim LOL. The Communists in Russia simply don't control the people as the Soviet Russians did. You can't replicate the destruction of a monarchy like rebooting a story in Hollywood. The Communist epoch in Russia is over. The immediately gave the CCP all Russian power over the global Marxist cult. The evil empire of Reagan is alive and well. Centered now is China.
1
@schiftymapping This is a proxy war. And worst of all is that it is Western leftist parties that want to get Russia. For what? Are they now anticommunist? No. They're angry at Russia for dissolving the Soviet Communist empire. And the CCP surreptitiously goads them in to attacking Russia as "fascist" as if the CCP is not also textbook Fascist other than copying Mussolini's uniforms and icons. Leftists invented fascism, terrorism, and all of these paranoid "bogey man" political doctrines.
1
@timloo6191 India is doing much better than China at actual human development. Nobody is afraid of Indian engineers working in the wealthy nations just to steal everything that they can for their totalitarian government at home, since India has no totalitarian government.
1
@timloo6191 Are you a card carrying Communist?
1
@tytemind7850 LOL. How would you even determine such a thing? You can easily justify it just by citing its military. OK. But also the most generous. And the most evil and so forth. The most of the mostest of the mostest. Thanks for commenting. But also note that you are replying to a comment pertaining to an arrogant political party claim (the CCP) and you answered with an "arrogant nation" trope. If you don't understand your own fallacies you'll continue to post useless garbage. Biden's party is far worse than the CCP. But it looks like it's still possible to change that with elections. We'll see how it goes at the end of this year.
1
@moinyp There's no such thing as an arrogant nation unless it's ruled by an authoritarian Marxist like Stalin, Hitler or Xi.
1
@rl8571 Mexico is a failed state. It's so obvious. Look at the southern border with the USA. Who delivers all of the drugs and smuggled humans?
1
@evilnet1 Using language and concepts like "developed" (as in developed economy) is the most simplistic form of Marxism there is. Mexico, China, Iran etc. are not going to follow Maslow's hierarchy of needs as a nation. That's not ever how it works. What happens is that if you reward corruption you get even more of it.
1
@bradleymiller7375 Nobody enforces treaties as "laws". Nobody enforces treaties as a rule. It's an honor system and up to the politicians to defend the treaties. It's all negotiable on an ongoing basis, in reality. That is the reality of so called "international law".
1
You guys have to get over these "war" risk tropes where you're trying to see if Henry V would dare to march against Charles I d'Albret. The goal of every Marxist regime is to both trigger chaos and confusion and at the same time look for revolutionaries to topple all regimes or governments taht fail to submit to what Lenin called the (Communist) Vanguard Party. WRT CCP goals in "war" (some overt use of their military) is to "defend its rights" as if to carry on with these fictional stories of colonial oppression and deprivation (including Taiwan's existence) and the entire "South China Sea" as well. These all represent "deprivation" casus belli stories. They don't have to win any war or battle in order to win increased hegemony and recognition over their bogus claims. They want control over the entire South Chine Sea and submission from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and so forth. You think the US made up "Domino Theory"? LOL. The part that they've already achieved is that they have loyal factions in nearly every Western democracy on the planet that don't even try to hide the fact that they think China can do anything that it wants to until it achieves "equity" with respect to Gross Domestic Production per capita with the USA. This means that in theory their macroeconomy can grow 4 times what the US reports before anyone can ask them to knock off the slavery and the predatory espionage and so forth. They can't not afford to change their tactics unless they decide to abandon Leninism (single party rule by Communist "councils" and a supreme leader). The most precarious thing about the CCP is the numbers. They're "successful" only for a small elite group and the masses must be kept tightly in check. One false move and the people of China itself will throw out the Communist regime.
1
This has been obvious since Obama's last year in office. Trump upset the Communists and made them even more fearful of the US. This is why the Communists immediately joined leftists around the world to attack Trump's Presidency with all of the political corruption they could muster. They've been donating to the Clintons since the 1990s and there were helpful in Hillary's Presidential campaign including all of the agitprop against Trump before and after Trump won. Until today, actually. But in terms of "geopolitics" all Marxist regimes rely on total control of their populations and "means of production". When "central plans" start to fall short they must have fallback plans to boost economic output and, just as importantly, reduce hegemony of rivals. The end goal is one consolidated "means of productions" under "Communist Vanguard Party" control. This is what Lenin described as "New Economic Policy" shortly after he found he needed to explain to all of the Russian revolutionaries why Communist Utopian would not immediately follow their total political control over Russia. But anyway, every overtly and covertly "Marxist" regime since then (this includes any regime that sees "evolutionary theory" as requiring regimes to get bigger and bigger through consolidation with eventually only one global regime left as ruler) has used military expansionism to control land and energy resources to fill in dips in GDP growth. But again, the critical thing is not to "get rich" or "compete". They have to maintain the facade of "progress" while at the same time making sure that they only ever rise in hegemony and putting rivals out of business. China wants Taiwan for this reason but this is only because they are a juicy target nearby and the near-term goal is to establish sovereignty over international waters as "exclusive economic zones" for China. They want to defend the "South China Sea" as if this is just a fact through international law that it belongs to China. This is far more important than taking direct political control over Taiwan. If they make war on Taiwan and everything goes well, they will take as much as they can. But the real plan is to create a casus belli that is repeated throughout the global institutions start a big war, and then withdraw in the name of peace, but they will not give up control over these international waters that they have already claimed.
1
Still won't say.
1
@-.-Monster Well, duh. Capitalism must be deleted, dude.
1
@sushi_wolf You found some debris from a Big Mac Meal?
1
@sushi_wolf But, Capitalism. Amiright?
1
@-.-Monster There's a certain class of people (two classes, actually) that love all of this destruction. They imagine themselves to be rising because of it, in relative terms.
1
@kyle6781 Normally, cokeheads worry about their supply. Unless they're also drug kingpins that stash it throughout their hideouts. So it's not really lost. It's waiting to be used.
1
@ph8599 "People's Republic" is code for Communist State.
1
No, you're wrong. They hate each other. Period. They never married. Every attempt to show 'unity' is actually pragmatic only. They don't even hate the USA. They envy any wealthy nation. Russia overcame totalitarian Marxism. The CCP got worse as it became the de facto vanguard party. If you think Putin doesn't understand that...I don't know what to say from here.
1
There's only one nation, one party, actually, that benefits from the slow destruction of Russia. Do any of you clowns know which party that is? All of the childish warmongering comments are pathetic. Even John Bolton has gone over the edge of clear-minded sanity.
1
@PranicEnergy That's not the only thing that screwed Europe on energy supplies/costs. They're in even worse trouble than that because they're the ones that started this idea about outlawing internal combustion engines. Japan will win that round, which is OK with me because US auto manufacturers were bound to fail since they were the first "woke" corporations since the 1950s.
1
@damocles8417 Great. Did you figure out what "navy air force" means yet?
1
@damocles8417 The OP was talking about Taiwan. And even the USA has naval air forces. As you already admitted.
1
Europe is full of dirty players and has been since long before Putin was born. It's never really been stable since the French Revolution.
1
In any venue that suggests it operates in accordance with "law" (and that includes treaties) there is something called clean hands doctrine. Nobody has clean hands here. Triggering a NATO response would be insane. It's already involved too much with all of the stupid provocative talk. If Joe Biden still had his brain functioning (not sure he ever did) then he would be the first one to blame here.
1
@noname72390 This is closer to WWII than to WWI. Other than the weapons involved. IT's paranoia all around and slow boil provocations brought us here, still without many people realizing who benefits from all of these provocations and weapons launched, not to mention death and destruction.
1
 @TheEasternCat In what way is that? The CCP is a collection of sovereign "united states" living under a written Constitution with an independent Supreme Court? Who knew?
1
@jorgelouis709 I think people really don't understand "invasion" threats. It's not NATO that threatens Russia. It's all Marxist politicians in power. Marxist theory suggests that only one regime can win in the end. For Marxists the world is like Mad Max's Thunderdome on a global scale. Every Western power has Marxists influencing foreign policy to some degree or another. China doesn't even really want to occupy Taiwan, never mind any other nation that doesn't even speak any Chinese languages. What they want is enough domination to ensure that they're rule is never threatened and that nobody can ever say no to the CCP regime when they want something like natural resources, control of ports and so forth. Not many Westerners understand what Putin is all about. He saw the failures of Communist political paradigms and he doesn't want modern Russia to go down the same path as the Soviet version. Putin inherited quite a mess.
1
@fabp.2114 That dude is on drugs. They don't even want to invade the Americas. They want political control over the USA. They already control every leftwing political party and "liberation movement" in the world.
1
Thank Biden for what?
1
As Communist espionage goes this case is pretty tame. I suppose this is supposed to convince US Citizen's that the FBI is totally on it as the CCP transfers terabytes of engineering data out of the USA on a daily or even hourly basis.
1
@kith00000 More stupid tropes. Was WWII fought to "meddle"? Fighting in every country? LOL. For sure the cult that runs DC has gone off the rails but the programs were put in place to end WWII. And unfortunately FDR thought Stalin made a great partner for that project all while colleges were slowly taken over by deluded Marxists. And you only ever hear about "meddling" and not when we ladle out funds on an annual basis. The theme song at the UN is "Money, that's what I want". Was the creation and support of the UN considered "meddling" back then? How about now? The US does have many "meddling" politicians and bureaucrats but my answer to that is "just say no".
1
@McSlapped Try drug rehab.
1
@stevebriggs9399 They don't believe in "rights" at all. "Rights" ideologies come from the premise that there are rules to determine who is righteous in a given conflict. Without some organizing doctrines there are only powers and prerogatives. Even in Europe under "Christendom" righteousness was only considered spiritual and in cases of conflicts between those of the same class. We now call this tort law. The king had powers and his accusations could not be taken lightly. The "rights" discourse in terms of legality started to come in to play when some of the king's close allies asked for rules when the king levied an accusation against them. This early charter took a long time to evolve in to the notion that all people living under a righteous governor should also have areas that could not be infringed without justification. So, you're right but it's far more extreme than simply rejecting rights of individuals that make up the masses of workers and peasants and so forth. And by the way, Communists are exactly the same. Communism and China got along well until too many people realized that it's just another hypocritical emperor with a new story.
1
@V1brationCanine It's getting that way. Socialists in the West don't believe in rights either. They're getting more and more like the most desperate Marxists.
1
Communist expansionist regimes are expansionist by definition. So the question is, is the CCP inherently expansionist? LOL. These planned "attacks" have been underway for decades. Actually, the "revolution" was never deemed complete. They're Communists. Does anyone understand what that means?
1
@henli-rw5dw They lied quite a bit about Covid and many other things. They lie by omission as well. Marxists start off by declaring everything but Communism to be illegitimate and based on lies. So they are merely "defending the people" collectively in accordance with this dogmatic belief system.
1
@mfndjdjdjdh They portray Marxist regimes as morally righteous. Not "powerful".
1
@mcredwolf925 Everything is political according to some. You don't understand your own lexicon. And if you want to know what I'm talking about you need to read the entire comment that you're apparently replying to. At that stage you might come up with an intelligent question. Political means pertaining to the polity or "governed domain". Everything "effects politics" in some way. So your comment/question is quite stupid given that I clearly responded with an explanation of my view that did not require any agreement on what "political" actually means.
1
@TomReitano I think what Putin is figuring out is that Stalin was not too bright. It was apparently Stalin's decision to give nuclear weapons to the CCP. If not for that the world would be very different today. Putin is not "afraid" of NATO. He's afraid of the CCP that is encircling Russia.
1
Clinton and the British Parliament were deluded at that time and some of the things they set in motion are still causing disasters they won't accept blame for.
1
They did not kick "America's ass". They demoralized our troops (who should not have been subjected to a draft) and the hippies demoralized each other and made a bunch of trouble. And LBJ should never have sent troops there to engage directly militarily. But Vietnam did defend their sovereign homeland quite effectively and that's a good thing for Westphalian sovereignty that the "world order" is supposed to be based on. Without it the UN is just a puppet show.
1
@grampsstories What "Russian interference" are you alluding to?
1
@darkriku12 You don't make any sense. At all. The issue is how conflicts are resolved. "Corporate mindset" is just gibberish since there is no such thing except in the minds of people that take the language and precepts of Freudian psychology and try to take their "personal truth" feelings and convert them in to facts about the entire world.
1
@darkriku12 So, you don't see any significant differences and therefore your testimony is worse than useless. Any and all human institutions have the human factor involved. Bravo. MBA-style mindset. LOL.
1
@servant-of-cats You're talking about "for profit" corporations that are for making profits? I'm pretty sure we all know about this.
1
@RayBlazar No, it's not. Only leftist Marxists in the West get triggered by Russia contending with Ukraine over borders. The CCP is the king troublemaker since the Soviet Union dissolved itself and held elections.
1
@RayBlazar Russia is threatening to match the escalations from the Euroloons and leftist American regimes.
1
@AHusBandWifEO Every Western power has at least half of its "democratic" leaders employing "Social Darwinist" doctrines. You know, progress comes from "selective pressures" and "survival of the fittest". So, therefore, war is good for progress (is what many believe and say only in off the record comments).
1
@Chess_and_Universe_Astronomy It seems like India has a growing neo-Marxist wing.
1
@mdogdope We still have elections, in theory. So things can change back to the proven policies. The so called "petro dollar" was destroyed intentionally from inside DC.
1
Half of DC is MCGA.
1
@animejanai4657 The CCP has more control over US elections than the US Democratic Party on its own. All of the "dirty hands" actors are country level social justice criminals. But the US Citizens don't come up with these schemes. They don't decide who will run for office in the US Democratic Party. The first US President they fully controlled was Bill Clinton. Obama thought he followed "International Consensus" but doesn't understand who controls that. The handlers that controlled Obama now control Biden and all of the bureaucrats loyal to this "Social Justice Arc of History" (Fabian Communist) agenda.
1
@marloncebo242 Planned pandemic. But that was more like a Hail Mary pass. This time they want to take control of the "South China Sea" not to get Biden elected again but before anyone can replace him. The irony here is that if they attack before Biden is gone they will take everything that they need for the next 20 years. At least according to their own planners.
1
Right. But people don't seem to understand what the Russian Communists began to do between the first Russian revolution and second and how they responded to the end of WWI. Do you realize how many "Islamic terrorists" went to college in Soviet Russia? So, many Islamists believe more or less that the critiques of "Westernism" are valid and at the same time they think that the Communists are "useful idiots" of the Islamists while Communists believe the reverse theory. That is why OBL was our good friend when he fought the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan while at the same time, when suitable, he targeted enemies of the Communists as well. And used Marxist Critical Theory dogmas to justify his actions. All in the language of what we call "Liberation Theology" when it springs up in the Western world. OBL also rejected his own Saudi government once it shunned him to defend the Saudi Kingdom from Kuwait. He saw this as a "lack of faith" and an insult to OBL's own bona fides. If you need arms to liberate yourself from any nation that holds real elections you might want to question your own beliefs before you start useless wars. Especially if you never even once try to negotiate with lawmakers and voters over whatever your dispute is. But your bottom line point is critically important. All of these "liberation" and "terror" movements favor the CCP now. They used to be skillfully cultivated and directed by Russian Communists. The CCP while pretending to embrace "free trade" stealthily took over all of it. On every continent although the CCP and Mao were always masters of Communism in Asia not counting the eastern side of Russia.
1
@snowdroog1 You need to spend more time with a proper dictionary. OTOH, as a typical "whataboutist" Marxist, you've achieved your aim here. The one valid point is that you are correct that the Marxists did goad the US in to failed "nation building" paradigms.
1
@CrusterfunkShenanigans Nothing in the material world is infinite. Time is infinite but our exploitation of it is not. And time is not material. We use laws of "material" to measure relative time. And only a Prog equates military expenditures with escalation of resistance/defense when our military is already more effective than Russia's and China's combined. And we don't even have to counter them in "world war" scenarios. Our "decline" is purely from malice and stupidity of our own pseudo "patriotic" leaders. And Russia will never work in lockstep with China for the sake of Chinese hegemony. The war in Ukraine is about Russian containment of China. China accepts it because China still expects to gain control over what remains of Ukraine and Russia keeps control over its gains. And just about every nation that holds elections wants us to keep China contained and with its very weak navy. Marxist traitors are embedded everywhere so that conversations get difficult to follow if you have no real idea what you're talking about.
1
@ТарасМакаренко-ф3ш Money is not freedom in China. Money is not freedom under Communism.
1
@RobertoChavez5-j3o Who are you replying to?
1
@RobertoChavez5-j3o The threat is that they will crash the economy and the central government, the CCP, will sort of dissolve. The soldiers won't follow orders and so forth. In the event it is mostly likely that a faction from within the military would claim control of some territory and declare martial law while calling the formation of a new government. That's what you would expect in a successful modern revolution.
1
There is no legitimate role for NATO in Ukraine. That ship has sailed. And worse is that they have been playing games since the Soviet Union fell.
1
@goranstajic2600 Turkey is not an EU member so there is no conflict with it joining BRICS. NATO is a "self defense" treaty. If the other NATO countries in Europe had any brains they'd realize that if NATO is to have any relevance today it should invite Russia to join it. Russia is no threat to NATO today. There is only one actual threat to NATO today or 2 if you count NK as independent from the CCP. It's disturbing to me how many stupid pundits don't see how all of this Russian demonization among the Western powers favors only the CCP.
1
@raven4k998 Airspace or territory?
1
@Mwwwwwwwwe That's what what whataboutism is. China pays traitors very well and if they can threaten your family's well being they don't even have to pay you. Hunter got caught for being a moronic crackhead but he's still a blatant traitor and none of hos cronies mind any of it. Hence they are equally suspect.
1
@Arthur-jg4ji Most European nations don't care. Most EU members don't even run their own nations independently of EU decrees. And the EU is like the CCP but without any burden to really deliver anything to its constituents. It exists to control The Commanding Heights. Just like the CCP.
1