Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "China can't afford a WAR, It Would Lose Against USA | Compilation" video.

@DailyGPT365 You can find arrogance everywhere, including in your own comment. So what?
18
@Sparta1993 How silly.
17
@rufanuf1 Give me some examples of idiots in the free world. Just call them Marxists or come up with a better explanation.
8
@Tripper42024 You don't see any silly comments? Strategic lying is fundamental to Marxism, for sure. But that is not the silly comment I replied to.
7
@davidmoore5004 It doesn't work quite like that.
4
@Mikewee777 Nope. Its military + industrial. And the complex also includes the permanent US bureaucracy.
4
@acarnivorouscat4549 Underestimating what?
3
@ma.2099 Right. But at the same time, all of these conflicts are "political" and not really in response to existential threats. We ended WWII by occupying Germany and Japan. That went pretty well. The Communists continued bad faith dealings with the USA and Truman responded with "UN consensus" to sort of act like the world was divided into two empires. So in some sense when we act out with silly explanations (not even seriously explaining our purpose to the Citizen voters) then we become unstable and untrustworthy any time we act beyond a clear, ratified treaty. All of the wars since WWII were wars of choice and to be honest, the only nation we clearly had a duty to destroy (militarily) was Japan. And that is really the only one that turned in to a lasting, healthy treaty. There's a lesson in there that nobody wants to hear for some reason. I blame academic Marxists in "Western" schools. One of the lessons is that culturally, Europe is a wreck and they have not moved smoothly in to "democracy" because too few of the nations really transformed from monarchy to some form of rule-of-law democracy. And US politicians half of the time want to turn the US in to a "republic" governed by "deep state" institutions in the style of the late monarchies of Europe.
3
@stevev4863 Over what period?
2
@timloo6191 India is doing much better than China at actual human development. Nobody is afraid of Indian engineers working in the wealthy nations just to steal everything that they can for their totalitarian government at home, since India has no totalitarian government.
1
@timloo6191 Are you a card carrying Communist?
1
@tytemind7850 LOL. How would you even determine such a thing? You can easily justify it just by citing its military. OK. But also the most generous. And the most evil and so forth. The most of the mostest of the mostest. Thanks for commenting. But also note that you are replying to a comment pertaining to an arrogant political party claim (the CCP) and you answered with an "arrogant nation" trope. If you don't understand your own fallacies you'll continue to post useless garbage. Biden's party is far worse than the CCP. But it looks like it's still possible to change that with elections. We'll see how it goes at the end of this year.
1
@moinyp There's no such thing as an arrogant nation unless it's ruled by an authoritarian Marxist like Stalin, Hitler or Xi.
1
You guys have to get over these "war" risk tropes where you're trying to see if Henry V would dare to march against Charles I d'Albret. The goal of every Marxist regime is to both trigger chaos and confusion and at the same time look for revolutionaries to topple all regimes or governments taht fail to submit to what Lenin called the (Communist) Vanguard Party. WRT CCP goals in "war" (some overt use of their military) is to "defend its rights" as if to carry on with these fictional stories of colonial oppression and deprivation (including Taiwan's existence) and the entire "South China Sea" as well. These all represent "deprivation" casus belli stories. They don't have to win any war or battle in order to win increased hegemony and recognition over their bogus claims. They want control over the entire South Chine Sea and submission from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and so forth. You think the US made up "Domino Theory"? LOL. The part that they've already achieved is that they have loyal factions in nearly every Western democracy on the planet that don't even try to hide the fact that they think China can do anything that it wants to until it achieves "equity" with respect to Gross Domestic Production per capita with the USA. This means that in theory their macroeconomy can grow 4 times what the US reports before anyone can ask them to knock off the slavery and the predatory espionage and so forth. They can't not afford to change their tactics unless they decide to abandon Leninism (single party rule by Communist "councils" and a supreme leader). The most precarious thing about the CCP is the numbers. They're "successful" only for a small elite group and the masses must be kept tightly in check. One false move and the people of China itself will throw out the Communist regime.
1
@henli-rw5dw They lied quite a bit about Covid and many other things. They lie by omission as well. Marxists start off by declaring everything but Communism to be illegitimate and based on lies. So they are merely "defending the people" collectively in accordance with this dogmatic belief system.
1
@mcredwolf925 Everything is political according to some. You don't understand your own lexicon. And if you want to know what I'm talking about you need to read the entire comment that you're apparently replying to. At that stage you might come up with an intelligent question. Political means pertaining to the polity or "governed domain". Everything "effects politics" in some way. So your comment/question is quite stupid given that I clearly responded with an explanation of my view that did not require any agreement on what "political" actually means.
1