Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "BREAKING NEWS: Marjorie Taylor Greene Says 'Everything's At A Gridlock' In GOP Picking New Speaker" video.

  1.  @tascrphs  And why is that?
    4
  2.  @evangiles4403  Scalise said he is being treated for "blood cancer". Your engineer-father should have made sure you understood basic logic in communications and making claims.
    4
  3.  @CarlMartin-hw3ev  The point made is that the debates should be out in the open where the public can monitor and immediately lobby their own representatives and so forth. That's as "direct" as it gets. There's no such thing as a large republic taking everyone's arguments before holding a vote. The closest to that would be a State petition that is voted on by registered voters in a given state. There's no way in the USA to hold an election for a nationwide petition to be passed in to law. So, yeah. There's no "direct universal vote election" for the House Speaker either.
    3
  4.  @jackielobin7100  What white nationalism? What does that even mean?
    2
  5.  @KathrynAnnWilliams  Give me an example of a "truer" democracy?
    2
  6.  @StopListenThink  He spoke at a conference and yada yada supposedly this group believes XYZ according to critics. Keep in mind these are the same people that think Ted Cruz and Donald Trump are also White Nationalist Christofascists. They have no idea what they're even talking about.
    1
  7.  @sarahnafkha9565  OK, Communist. You could just go ahead and move to China.
    1
  8. Jordan is one of the few that is not known to be a backstab. But this makes him a target from all of the people that run the TDS "anti-capitalist" schemes. When they say "Our Democracy" they're not including anyone that disagrees with them in the slightest.
    1
  9.  @audreyodonoghue462  Exactly. That coupled with open debates would make it "democratic" AF. As the kids like to say.
    1
  10.  @KathrynAnnWilliams  You're confused. The colonies became States. They're sovereign States with a Federal Constitution that unites those States. The Federal government itself is not intended to have any involvement in daily life. It's for "national security" and to have a top level supreme court that is the intended to be the ultimate arbiter on interpreting the law (framed by the words of the US Constitution). The People can collectively change the words of the US Constitution by following the careful process outlined in it. Today, the President is like a cult leader responsible for daily national security issues (that change is driven mainly be modern technology and the reach of today's enemies) but domestic affairs are governed by Governors. So why is the President such a critical figure for "governing" or "presiding over" the national macroeconomy? Because of the New Deal. Plain and simple. The New Deal was forced in the public by economic terrorists, anarchists and ideological Marxists (the anarchists had the same vision but simply did not care about "solidarity" because they thought that the "revolution" would be fully organic as people "woke up"). This all happened before TV, before jets, when barely anyone could think about trying to fly around the world in an airplane. This happened mainly because public schools were slowly terrorizing students with fearmongering about Malthusian economics initially. These were and are doctrinaire, pseudoscientific atheists that posit the first step in "woke" is to understand that Christian morality caused all of this by asking people to pray to God before stealing, attacking people who establish peacekeeping barriers like walls and fences and so forth. But anyway, the Senate represents soveriegn States' interests in a similar way that the UN is intended to represent nation states. It's not supposed to be "democratic" at all. The House of Representatives is "our (federal) democracy" and that's it. The system is FUBAR because of the New Deal and how the entire Democratic Party and "fourth estate" coordinated the fearmongering and "common sense" consolidation of power. The whole thing required the creation of what we now call "the deep state" and the "two party" uniparty system. Where "the deep state" culls candidates and narrows the field to acceptable, controllable candidates. The Deep State was an accidental creation of FDR and the Deep State controlled President Truman before and after he was sworn in. The problem with "Our Democracy" can be traced back historically to those events I just explained. In school you probably learned about "the roaring 20s" and "Robber Barons" so that by the time you reach the stories about The Great Depression and WWII FDR is supposed to be Our Great Hero. Like Stalin is to Russian Communists. And Stalin was to US Marxists as well. Just like FDR. Try "google images" and - FDR Stalin - search string.
    1
  11.  dimebagvision3221  These 'term limits' people just don't get it. The ones that run all the schemes are the careerists, and the elected officials are just brought in after the fact. Get rid of 90% of these parasites that are "professional politicians" and once they're all cleared out you can then see if you still like your own representatives. You won't be worried so much about everyone else's elected reps because most of the career criminals will have to find work elsewhere.
    1