Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "Alina Habba Accuses VP Of 'Committing A Crime' At Trump's PA Rally: 'Let Me Tell You What, Kamala!'" video.

@sonnguyen-qe1ww What's your first language? And where did you receive your political indoctrination?
27
@Deltron6060 No, we have not done what Russia is doing. That's not true at all. Although we should occupy and demilitarize a zone of up to several miles deep in to Mexico of the southern border. And then if Mexico steps up (after all of the crying) and takes their own border security seriously we can allow them to move in to run their side of that border. And the reason European borders are so unstable is because they don't have stable political systems. The most stable is the British islands. Islands. Not one historical monarchy has really taken a clean break from authoritarianism of the past from a time when authoritarian monarchs were pretty much the only thing possible for any "prince of the realm" or stable sovereignty. Leftism is not in conflict with authoritarian rule. They want to create new authoritarian regimes to replace the historical monarchies and "received culture" institutions. All of Europe is stuck in false dilemmas about how to "modernize" in accordance with the Jacobin Marxist cultists. They do not believe in rule-of-law democracies (which be necessity means you have a republic with a clearly enforceable written constitution).
3
@petrciperny Do you think international relations is like checkers where you "pick a side" every time some crybaby wants to "socialize" something else? Is it not possible that the bad guy in that scenario is the USA first by "election interference" and the lying about what US State Department was doing there, trying to "transform" another sovereign nation? Ukraine is one of (if not the worse) case of the US meddling just because the US State Department cult sees itself as above elected officials. They are Uberdemocratic, in their minds. And after all of that we're supposed to make sure there is "balanced war" as both sides annihilate each other in a balanced way? The best wars never happen. The second best are over quickly. Evil people try to get two sides to have "fairness" so that they can do some population culling that socialists always crave.
2
@Chris-wb3qe Got any evidence to back your story or is this just "common sense" gossip? Because not unlike in Iraq and Iran we're apparently sending pallets of cash. How is it that you think the money can be transferred to US arms manufacturers yet can't be accounted for? Do you think the US government uses only cash transfers for all payments these days? And of course the same goes for illegal aliens and these transfers. They want that recorded in order to integrate them in to their welfare systems. Once established, they have "due process rights" to deal with in order to take it away. You have no idea how Marxists play the game. Or as it used to be called, the Art of War.
2
@pattymiller9040 I'm pretty sure the law even specified payments for retirement funds for Ukrainians of some kind. And lots of pallets of cash ala Iraq and Iran. It's how US State Department and CIA roll. Also reminds me of the War on Drugs but that's another topic, I guess. Everyone in power gets "golden parachute" deals going in. They all have retirement villas paid for by US taxpayer funding and the challenge now is to live long enough to get there.
2
Banana republic is basically a trope that mocks Marxist regimes trying to "develop economically" using a combination of Marxism and the kinds of elections perfected by our own evil Demon Rat party. So it's natural after FDR and the Cold War where our "deep state" institutions assembled their own Supreme Soviet in DC that we too would use "banana republic" ruling (and elections) paradigms. Holding elections makes you "democratic" by magic, is what all Marxists try. Even FDR's State Department (still in power to rule over Truman) promoted elections in Italy and made sure the Italian Communists lost. Some DC Marxists were loyal to the US at that time and the globalist Marxists were there from the start of FDR's New Deal. The infighting gradually subsided and by the time Bill Clinton came along they decided that "Social Justice" was about placing the highest priority on helping the CCP develop to "right size" so that we could "collaborate" in a bipolar Marxist world (since Russia got defamed by rejecting nominal Communism).
1
@Majan-v8K Your insane "you too" tropes are so tiresome.
1
@Majan-v8K Sane and insane meet at the same point traveling in opposite directions. Your second sentence was the gibberish typical of the insane who are unaware of their true condition, naturally. Within the sane people there are spectrums of ignorance but sane people understand their own ignorance. The insane do not. Leftism itself is rooted in insanity.
1