Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "BREAKING NEWS: Vivek Ramaswamy And Ro Khanna Have Spirited Debate In New Hampshire" video.

@Logan91S Sometimes "word salad" is a mendacious trope that reflects the idiocy of the commentary rather than the target.
2
Why would you believe in Marxism for the USA at all?
1
@jmendoza16 In Theory Vivek is perfect for the Libertarian Party. But the Libertarian Party has so many Critical Theory dupes that they end up defending the Democratic Party by employing Critical Theory tropes against the non-woke Republicans.
1
@jeannerogers7085 Yes. Resistance to Communism is tragic. So tragic.
1
@Wilky2526 No they would not. You have no idea about US politics. Zero. Nobody can run as a Democrat and even mention reducing the size or scope of the Fifth Column, Fifth Estate. And now that Trump got away with it no Republican can either.
1
@Lucky110-d9b Marxists think that Critical Theory is "science". They think that you're a Science Denier. Ask her what she thinks about Climate Change and the Critical Theory answer will come just like every other Marxist troll responds.
1
@vjrdy8397 Well, yeah. They are full blown Soviets now. If you understand how that system operated. They must have total political control over everything. The politicians under the Soviet system only know how to stab the backs of their rivals. Same with the CCP.
1
His time will come if he's serious about his policy preferences.
1
@chrislin2774 Wow. Good thing you're here to report on something about gossip or whatever. He's obviously campaigning on an agenda and a backup if Trump is illegally removed from State ballots or illegally convicted or some event like that where your Communist mob sort of takes Trump out of contention one way or another. Perhaps your cult will do an RFK on him.
1
@lukeasacher Vivek is in the top 5 of the best running mates. It's not that he's lacking in anything but simply because of others already lined up and Vivek's age makes it wiser to support him later in life. Corporate CEO's know what ascension planning is and the one thing we must do is keep the US Democratic Party out of control of the White House from here until the end of history. Or they will end our republic. Having said that it would be awesome to have Vivek as a Senator. If there's any chance of him running for California Governor and winning that too would help restore the republic and put him in line for President. Better yet as a running mate in 2028 who then runs for President and 2036. The goal must be to eradicate Communism in the White House and Congress. Everyone else in the USA can easily resolve the petty differences taht remain. All of the problems with the republic are rooted in these traitors that first tried to build a one party Federation called the Confederacy and then immediately after "giving up" on the Civil War they assassinated Lincoln and started acting like French Jacobins and Marxists since that time up until today. They won't give it up on their own.
1
No, it's not like that. Vivek is proposing what Clinton should have proposed when Clinton pretended that the collapse of the Soviet Union meant that Communism had been defeated worldwide. They started to pretend that China's "open markets" meant that the CCP was not "democratic" or something. Clinton comes from a cult of insane sociopathic liars. But what is needed is an end to the New Deal "emergency" governance where Fabian Marxism has been steadily ramped up justified by endless chains of "emergencies" where real problems are actually made worse by them in order to have a continuous stream of "emergencies" or "critical social justice struggles" like "Climate Change" and so forth. It's not about revolution at all. It's about restoration of serious candidates to restore the rule of law as framed by the written US Constitution. IF they want to change the Constitution there is a process for that written in it explicitly. They instead want emergency after emergency so that the words of it create no barriers to their totalitarian single-party rule. They are already creating a Marxist Soviet state.
1
Make Bureaucracies Great Again!!!
1
@yvonneplant9434 Because Nimrata is somewhat of a neocon. Actually, more like a retro-soc. She likes the top heavy "democratic" state when she feels she can control it. She's a bit to gung ho with the New Deal/never-ending Marshall Plan (the names were changed to protect the guilty).
1
@meandmyindianhusband6482 Impressive. Socialized mineral rights makes sense in India but there is no "socialist" doctrine that makes any sense at all in the USA. Your public education has corrupted your mind.
1
The thing is that inspiring US Citizens should not disparage others. It doesn't. It's stupid. Marxist think that poor people exist because the rich stole from them. This is insanity. The rich got a bad rap for a short period of time when monarchs tapped their landed elites for commercial development in what is called the age of sail. And those countries affected (host and their colonies) might have unresolved land/property issues as we all transition to modern economies with mostly open markets everywhere. But the trend is also towards regulating everything as well. Because of the US position since WWII we are see as "The Font of Capitalism". This is absurd. And even if true they're doing nothing about true reform. What they're doing is following "Social Darwinist" theories that are basically all about French Jacobinism plus pseudoscientific Marxism. Think if Niccolo Machiavelli ran the world of today with total power simply by issuing fiat decrees. This is what Xi dreams about. Every Marxist regime dreams about this theory and possibility. The entire reason for Putin turning towards evil in the past 20 years is how China has repositioned itself as "good guys" in the "war on terror". Putin fully understands how Obama and his party turned that on "Capitalism" as the "root cause" of all "terrorism". And Obama is not even personally what people would call a radical. He just floated up in that party as they cultivated his image. And his wife is really an angry Critical Theory Marxist. She's one of the worst. I think she became the main tool to control Obama as a mild-mannered radical politician.
1
@West_Coast But he's on your side so you'd still vote for him.
1
@SuperKripke Do you even know what existential means? How about crisis? Can you explain those terms outside of the Freudian psychology lexicon?
1
@peterjermey7235 I'm pretty sure you do not because the greenhouse effect isn't a real thing in "climate science". A greenhouse effects its environment with transparent or semitransparent barriers. You only think that you understand "climate change" theory. Even calling something "greenhouse gases" is inherently mendacious and doesn't even fit with "carbon driven climate change" theory. The problem with using purely fact based science is that it's no good for trying to trigger people in voting for your stupid political policy preferences/delusions.
1
US energy policy is NOT about cleaning up the environment except by the "equilibrium" theory. The Marxist theory is that "advanced economies" must shift to "pure green industry". Like lawyers and various kind of agents to rule over the shrinking middle class as they wonder why their politicians shut down all industrial capacity. They must do this until China catches up on per capita GDP, which they will never do. They don't even want to. What they really want is "permission" to make their economy up to 4 times the size of the USA's and the same with the military. Not because they care about making all of their denizens live comfortable lives. I'm afraid very few people know how to research the differences between what Communists claim when trying to shut down "democracy" in their rival nations. Communism has no middle class. They have rulers and plebs. They say it's a Worker's Paradise but they lied. The workers are cannon fodder to kill off all powerful rivals of the Communist Vanguard Party.
1
US Civil Servants Love the Country! Yay! They totally believe in New Deal Brain Trust totalitarianism (described by Orwell's Animal Farm fable). Just like Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama (and Biden!!!) they totally, totally have pure intentions.
1