Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "'Are You Familiar With Something Called The QAnon Conspiracy?': Dick Durbin Grills Pam Bondi" video.

  1.  @pauljohnson-yk5dq  He's not crazy at all. He simply doesn't try too hard to mask his enthusiasm. You could argue that this is a flawed approach for whatever reason you want to but it doesn't make him crazy. Look a the facial expressions of Adam Schiff. That guy projects nothing but "crazy" delusion and an unstable mind. He's bordering on lunacy even when he knows he's on camera and on the record in Congress. Of course, his party has a lot of such people like that but Schiff never can turn it off and calm down.
    10
  2.  @ericdunlap494  Name the police that died and the official cause of death.
    2
  3.  @catlynx7820  Qanon is a trope. That's it. Why anyone would bring up such a thing in Congress is beyond sound reasoning.
    2
  4. Which case file did you review that you think does not deserve a Pardon?
    2
  5. He already has the case files from the defense attorneys. That's exactly what his plan has always been.
    2
  6.  @dong9514  The January 6 "protest" was explicitly protected by the First Amendment. The obvious liar is you. There's no Constitutional right to burn buildings and run in to the streets to terrorize people and steal private property.
    1
  7. @ Some were arrested and released before they were even booked. Some were booked and released. I assume some had to spend a few minutes or even a few hours in a holding cell but I don't know any specific cases. I don't know of any that were sentenced because I haven't heard about any trials or even plea bargains. The Marxists in politics and media turned them in to mythical heroes before the fires were put out. And Ms. Kammy promised legal aid and moral justifications for it all, all on TV, all while the fires were still burning.
    1
  8. I'm not saying you're right but that is what it looks like. You pass something on that is factual but also plant laughable accusations so that the whole affair is then presented as a hoax. Like "Pizzagate" and so forth to discredit all of the critics of these Marxists in DC. John Kelly himself probably isn't a Marxist but he doesn't know what Critical Theory Marxism is and how he got sucked in the pseudo "Enlightened" cult.
    1
  9.  @davidcaby9042  Constitutional rule of law is indeed dangerous to all Communists.
    1
  10.  @davidcaby9042  Speak for yourself.
    1
  11. Who do you think owns it?
    1
  12. The "police" in that event started the mayhem with smoke grenades and then marched on the protestors with aerosol cans to spray directly in their faces. When they defended themselves from the police that was characterized as assault. If the police had legitimate legitimate justification for clearing the protest area then they could make a misdemeanor case against some of them for resisting. But since the protest was protected by the First Amendment and the video shows that there was nothing happening to justify them suddenly declaring it a lawful assembly it is the police that broke the law under Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law. The burden of proof is still on "government" to prove otherwise and they controlled all of the video. So this leads me to conclude that the police acted unlawfully and that this illegal action was planned in order to give the Marxists in Congress a pretext to bypass all of the legitimate debate that recommended auditing the controversial ballot "certifications".
    1
  13. I thought "Q" represented an anonymous source or group of whistleblowers or something like that. Q is not a theory.
    1
  14. It's an Internet hoax or set of hoaxes. A living Internet hoax. She's candidate for US AG, not "trump's lawyer".
    1