Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "BREAKING NEWS: Jim Jordan Leads Weaponization Of Federal Government Hearing Feat. Jordan Peterson" video.

  1. 31
  2. 2
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7.  @BigPlay84Gaming  Dude, you have everything in reverse order. If you first put term limits on Congress you have no way to control the bureaucrats. The newbs always struggle to find their way and teh careerists draft everything for them. And some careerist elected officials just follow the unelected cult because they never have to call a new session. They're always ready to gaslight new arrivals. With respect to "corporate" lobbying what you want is transparency. You want to make sure no party with foreign interests has the same access to DC that Citizens do. And the burden of proof should be on both the lobbyists and the ones that receive them. IOW, they have this massive security state but none of this is used to keep track of "power" on behalf of the Citizens that "own" the republic. And related to that is that the scale and scope (actual powers) of the bureaucracy is the most unhinged political institution in the history of man. First Amend the Constitution pertaining to limits on "agency" powers. They have usurped each branch. And there's no one group that even understands how this Leviathan cult operates through back channels. So, that Amendment should formally empower Congressional oversite committees its own access to "security information" pertaining to lawless subversives operating under "Color of Law". And then put in mandatory budget cuts that ensure each agency loses 10% of its budget each year. And 10% of its head count. To add back you must have a freestanding bill and a supermajority vote and it still expires no later than 12 months. So these agencies will then rely on supermajority votes each year. And then you can put in a provision for term limits where the incumbent serves two terms and can run again but must win 60% of the vote to return to office. In those cases parties can run the incumbent and a backup and voters can choose first and second choice. Meaning those that want the incumbent as a first choice can specify where their vote goes if the threshold is not met for the incumbent to win. Trusted officials will stay longer and it will be easier for newbs to that party to challenge lame incumbents. Of course that's just a quickly written proposal that can be fine tuned. But I've already told you clearly what needs to be solved and how to solve it without handing more power to the bureaucracies and the crooks that run the place.
    1