Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "JUST IN: Republican Lawmakers Warn About Communism In US, Promote ‘Teaching Act’" video.

The issue is redefining enemy behavior. The problem with Communists is all of the bad faith arguments that they employ from K-12 public education (and this yes bled over in to private schools and even Catholic schools). This negatively affects voters, juries and politicians. This means they control what "enemy" or "crime" even means. If you understand US law and what they did to Trump you realize that you can't simply outlaw "Communism" or some vague definition for what they do. Figure out how the Demon Rats turned the entire security state on "The Patriarchy" by mainstreaming stupid rhetoric and trying to demonize terms like "Republicanism" and so forth. It's based in pure, ignorant emotion but these people fill the halls of academia and now Congress. Biden is too far gone to be regarded as a Communist. Owned by, yes. Philosophically he's always been a total idiot that didn't even understand what he was supposed to learn in law school.
6
@johnh.tuomala4379 All Marxists are racialist idiots. Woke is basically the same thing. They're cultural Marxists with all of the same beliefs. Woke don't even know how to explain their own dogmatic Marxist beliefs.
5
@Pyasa.shaitan What kind of nonsense are you preaching?
4
@joseph_bunnyman318 You must be joking. You don't know what "industrialize" or "rights" mean in serious conversations. Communism doesn't mean those things. It's an ideology that prophesied those things without any usable ideas about how to achieve that "end state" condition or even to improve anything about the human condition at all. It starts by creating victim narratives for those that feel excluded. It's pseudoscientific Jacobinism. All Marxist dogmas are demonstrably false. Even childish. And even if they successfully seize wealth from people taht created it there's no example, ever to show how their policy differences improved on the policies that they replace. They just propagate the dogmas that conflate things like wealth transfers with "measurable progress" because they can give estimates of how much wealth they destroy and redistribute. They never stop lying. Saying "Communists made all genders equal" is a complete departure from reality. It's a religious claim. You're a religious Communist.
4
@redandre5964 It's in the Communist Manifesto and in many bills put up by "Democrats" in the US Congress.
4
@jdarst100 Explain your problem with Republicans, if you can. Or are you simply pro-criminal, pro-rebellion, pro-destruction on the insane assumption that something better will magically rise from the ashes of whatever you destroy?
3
@johnh.tuomala4379 They can call it what they want but there's no question they must rely on Marxist dogmas like his labor value theory and all of the "disparity" dogmas that are piled on that one.
3
@joseph_bunnyman318 Specifically, what? I'm pretty sure you don't even know what Communist actually means.
3
@joseph_bunnyman318 You can't even define equality in realistic fashion. You think that your lexicon is authoritative because you don't know the difference between Utopian dreams and facts on the ground to mark discernible progress. That's why so-called "Progressives" destroy everything that they control and take credit for the things people already would do if given a chance to. And in many cases they take credit for things people already were doing. Like when Progressives pretend that they are the ones that liberated the slaves during the US Civil War. A rational standard for "equality" is "equal application of the law". If you want to go beyond that you must be very precise. Instead you conflate Utopian dreams with "Communist achievement". You should ask yourself why. But you never actually hold yourself accountable for rational goal achievement. You need Communism to shift blame away from deficits you feel about yourself.
3
@edwhite7475 Treason is already a capital crime. Everything on the list is either protected by the Bill of Rights or already outlawed but not enforced. It's not "corporations" or "lobbyists" that destroy the rule of law. The gold standard is not "anything that I feel is against Communism". It's the rule of law. Communism destroys all property rights and all legal rights that are used to protect your private property and freedom. Recognizing more precisely how our Constitution was created and why and then defending those principles that seek to protect and continuously improve liberty under the rule of law automatically keeps Communists out. Communism is the utter destruction of all individual legal rights. Everything is politicized. Anything can be ruled "against the law" if it conflicts with their "from each, to each" policies and verdicts. You see that this is already how they act. It's just that our legal rights are still defensible. They're not going to be persuaded by emotional appeals. Ed White's list is already part of the Communist agenda. What replaces all of this is known as the Administrate state. The Administrative state is the legal side of what is known colloquially as the Deep State. Under FDR it is State Department doctrines that began to creep in to the massive projects for domestic economic recovery. Which is to say that all legal rights were put on the back burner for the sake of this or that or the other thing. Creating new "emergencies" like Climate Change and Covid shutdown panics is what keeps that ball rolling. The end game is having total control over elections so that those too are mere puppet shows. Patriots need to take control of elections from school boards to the White House under the rule of law. Purge all lawless actors. It's a daily thing. But first learn how it works and how it is supposed to work. Review what it was like between the Civil War and WWII. That's the only way to clearly understand what the Communists have done so far and how to beat them.
3
@redandre5964 Those "minor reforms" are based on the agenda and the implied value system of the Communist Manifesto. Marxists do not believe in individual rights. Period. Neither does the party of slavery.
3
CRT is a religion. Period.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 Bless Communists for what, exactly?
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 You're a typical dogmatic loon. What evidence do you have to support your circular claims? Zero. Industrialize means exactly what it says. It's not "code" for increasing GDP metrics. I know exactly who has "industrialized" what and why. The actual history is not that difficult to understand and it contradicts everything that Marx wrote. Marx's "historical materialism" stories all made certain assumptions about cognitive dissonance from the very beginning. British and Dutch royal charters were "models of capitalist exploitation" that "scientifically" predicted what "economic disparity" would do on increasing levels. Actual industrialization did the exact opposite. The so-called class war was totally imagined. You won't comment further because you don't know how to make rational, verifiable claims. All of your "Reasoning" is based on doctrinaire lunacy. You're welcome.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 LOL. Give me an example of Communist industrialization. Like in Russia or China. You don't even know how to cite a region that your "books" talk about. It doesn't matter if you regard "books" as "factional" or not. If a book does not make verifiable claims then why bother? Just keep reading Star Wars and kooky leftwing tripe to inspire you. It's just that thinking people won't take you seriously. And hopefully kooks like you won't get paid by taxpayer-funded schools to push your delusions on a captive audience like K-12 students. For Communists progress is about death of monarchy and death of their real and imagined adversaries. They pick up the leftovers and take credit for any "gain" or trend upwards of the craters that they create. It's just pseudoscientific Jacobinism. And even more childish than that.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 LOL. You did not mention any sources whatsoever.
2
@joseph_bunnyman318 The 5 Year Plan. Which one? First man in "space". Communism didn't build that. The US and the Soviets both were racing to be "first" in rockets and basically spy satellites. This was all built on technology taken from Nazi Germany. Without Mao, what? Oh please. That's a religious belief. Mao's "great leaps" were, basically, about genocide. You don't really know anything that's true. Also, Russia was never "Third World" and that is a term you also totally fail to understand. Third World, according to modern Jacobins, is the modern corollary to the French Third Estate under the French "ancient regime". First World correlates to "industrialization under Capitalism" and Second World is "industrialized under Communism (or socialism)". These are silly paradigms that can perhaps form the beginning of an explanation for understanding major currents in the history of political controversies and how certain demagogues motivated their followers to achieve political power and "success" under the cult's new value system and analytical paradigms derived from this new value system. Basically, you're a sucker for fairy tales. You memorize chapter titles but don't understand the actual claims nor strength of the evidence and arguments for those views and dogmatic claims. (Still no sources mentioned. At all.)
2
@kimobrien. You're the one trying to "socialize" all mineral wealth.
2
@kimobrien. DNA doesn't enter in to US "politics" according to the original meaning of the term. But since you morons love to politicize everything you're the one to answer that question.
2
@redandre5964 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. 5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. 8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. 9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. 10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
2
@kimobrien. You're a hilarious and delusional liar. First it's "CIA" now it's at the "urging of Western Imperialists" when the truth is that without anti-Communist Indonesians they could have kept going with exactly what they wanted to do. The explicit fear wasn't just "democratic Communism" but that the Chinese Communists had been penetrating and trying to control Indonesian politics. Indonesians by and large did NOT want Communism and fewer still wanted to become a Chinese Communist satellite state. The alternative to Communist imperialism isn't "Western Imperialism". It's Westphalian sovereignty. You don't even know what the Bandung Conference was about. They found their own way and have good faith relations with other sovereign nations that aren't plotting to overthrow them, literally steal their fish and oil (not to mention other precious minerals), and so forth. Like you "generous" Communists want to do.
2
@louiswilson6950 What alleged lies are you thinking of?
1
@christopherforsyth5284 I was not taught that Communism is dangerous. What I was taught, slowly, was how things work today, how they worked in the past and what "Progressives" want to improve "democracy". I saw instantly that the "Progressives" were like children themselves trying to paint silly Utopian pictures. I thought maybe they were just dumbing it down for the students. After some years of that I finally realized that these are parasites looking for reasons to avoid serious work of any kind. The big change happened when "The Internet" was opened up and then nobody in or around Silicon Valley wanted to do any serious work at all. They thought Utopian Democracy was just a matter of finding the right "Artificial Intelligence" machines and "the next killer app" to invest in. These people were lunatics. It only got worse when Facebook moved there and Google turned in to a hidden tech empire because they were protected by the Federal government to keep its role under the public radar. Ask NSA dissidents about that. Pretty much all DOJ Antitrust actions were taken off the table for big teach once The Homeland Security Act was passed. They wanted tightly controlled tech monopolies and here we are. Communism itself is obviously based on the childish delusion of a terrified little parasite that lived and died in the 19th century. It makes me wonder how anyone could believe in that BS unless they still lived under a monarch that kept all of the mineral rights for itself and or "the state" if they had some kind of "democratic" political system at that stage. How any American could look around at American prosperity and think Communism had any answers whatsoever for problems already solved by US founders. And Communism itself is just pseudoscientific Jacobinism. Our founders knew about the French Jacobins. It's beyond belief that Cultural Marxism was allowed to ever flourish in the USA. Beyond belief. What were those parasitic idiots thinking? Leninism, the basic framework for fascism (his post-revolution New Economic Policy), was useful for some countries. But if they don't have elections and reliable courts by now I'd say that's a failure. Why anyone would think that Marxist dogmas are worth defending in this day and age is a mystery. I guess a lot of people want to be deceived.
1
@joseph_bunnyman318 "Was the 5-year plan, or first man into space a joke to you? In a couple of decades, the Soviet Union went from a third-world backwater to a world superpower." http://www.historyhaven.com/APWH/unit%204/THE%20INDUSTRIAL%20REVOLUTION.htm "During the late 1800s, industrialization spread to Russia and Japan, in both cases by government initiatives. In Russia the tsarist government encouraged the construction of railroads to link places within the vast reaches of the empire. The most impressive one was the Trans-Siberian line constructed between 1891 and 1904, linking Moscow to Vladivostock on the Pacific Ocean. The railroads also gave Russians access to the empire's many coal and iron deposits, and by 1900 Russia ranked fourth in the world in steel production."
1
@joseph_bunnyman318 You did not merely fail to cite your source you also paraphrased to the point that your rhetoric is useless. "Evidence found within books" that I already know how to read. LOL. Why do I need him? And even more to the point why do I need you crying about your dramatic misrepresentations of, basically, gossip that you got by watching videos that you don't really understand?
1
@joseph_bunnyman318 You're an incoherent kook. You even don't understand any of your own claims. The main idea with socialism is to fix power disparities, you kook. It's to make "the economy" more "fair". The theory that all of this "redistribution" and magic central planning has been completely debunked. Central planning is only key for a nation state when it needs to protect the thing being planned. As in "secrets" and "national security". The idea came from seeing wars produce massive economic expansion. The socialists thought taht they could take those "authoritarian" powers under "disparity emergency" doctrines. And that was supposed to be "fairer" and possibly expand GDP through control of more resources not magical "growth" doctrines promoted by socialist central planners. All of these programs were failures. To the extent that some programs focused "national workers" on national security projects, those things did happen. Sure. That's not really the root of any socialist's theory except maybe for Hitler and those influenced by German Nazism. They're at least open about their "natural law" theories directly derived from politicized Darwinism.
1
@joseph_bunnyman318 If I scoff at your childish agitation propaganda it must be due to MY ignorance!!!
1
@GreyPilledLibertarian Do you know what religion or religious means? It basically means dogmatic and ritualistic. It means devoted to the regularity of some thing.
1
@GreyPilledLibertarian You just made another dogmatic claim. Do you understand the implications of your own rhetoric? Obviously not. And what is your version of "patriotic" if not grounded in dogmas that you think are purified somehow by your arrogant, ignorant atheism? You can't speak for "America". You can't even speak clearly on your own behalf.
1
@joseph_bunnyman318 "Even non-Communist historians agree that in the Soviet Union, men and women had fully equal rights. " Communists believe that individuals don't even know what their own interests are until explained to them by Marxist "scientists". Their entire view of rights is inherently mendacious, oppressive and dehumanizing. They believe in stratified human capability that can't be overcome by equal application of the law. Hence, their view of "rights" is that THEY are always right. You are just another dumbass to Communists. They're not wrong about that. If you think I just made that up try doing some research. Search "critical theory Harvard rights discourses". Communists in power are far worse than what those academic idiots discuss. But it's all based on Marxist-materialist theories. No contrary facts are allowed by Critical Theory racialist idiots. See Critical Race Theory and "Intersectional Studies" to figure out why.
1
@joseph_bunnyman318 "And what "Utopian Dreams" Are you talking about? If you went back to ancient Rome and told people there how the future was they'd call you utopian." You don't know what anything means. Utopia was coined in the early 16th century. You obviously have no idea what it means. The Romans had running water in their cities. Add steam engines and the only significant difference between that and today came from the Manhattan Project and derivative technologies. Electric motors and silicon wafers are not "Utopian" and would only seem "Utopian" when first introduced. Just like the people were a few decades ago. People are not as inherently stupid as you think they are. It takes modern academia to produce thinkers like you.
1
Communists are idiots that think they are "woke" and master expositors of all human conditions. You have to show that you understand their Critical Theory bullshit and show why it's bullshit. They only have lame examples to support their analysis. Most of human progress happened for the exact opposite reasons taht they imply. Historical materialism is idiotic. Some places (sovereign nations) can make rational "reform" suggestions on land and mineral rights and "socialize" those things. So-called "means of production" can't ever be "socialized" like they claim. It's pure insanity.
1
@kimobrien. LOL. No again. All of the Marxist grievances are rooted in actual freaking monopolies that came from specific "royal charters". Like East India Trading Company. The "land" grievances came from monarchs handing out land grants. Even the British grew a middle class out of "Capitalism" (a term that means almost nothing but disparity whinges) during the Industrial Revolution that Marx claimed would make everything even worse for "oppressed workers". American sovereign nations (in the north) never had monarchs to claim mineral rights. Yet vast open lands have been set aside both for parks and energy exploration. Call taht "socialism" if you want but that's already been done. There are no "oppressed workers" in the Americas you parasitic liar. There are no "land monopolies" or "hegemonic forces" to cause "unfair disparity" except for the Command Economy that FDR's New Deal created. That's an example of failed socialism. Keep the Federal lands as they are. And get a freaking job. Don't blame me if you don't know how. Blame your socialist teachers.
1
@kimobrien. "In any conflict with big business your property rights are secondary as it is now." This abject nonsense from start to finish. The key areas of "concentrated prosperity" come from access to ports and mineral rights. The examples of "big business" coming in and buying up private land in ways that harms individual property rights would all entail building something like railroads, sea and air ports and so forth. All because of Federal (and States in some cases) demands. This has nothing to do with "profit motive" and everything to do with the innate corruption of you parasitic liars that conflate "national security" ("Federal emergency!") with free abortions and other completely deranged talking points grievances. The US Federal government is becoming innately corrupt not because it lacks "socialism" but because of FDR's New Deal socialism that got us in to a Great Depression (they "socialized" the suffering and made it all worse), WWII (where "fascists" were supposedly the opposite of "Communism" and "True Socialism" when everyone knew that FDR was doing exactly what Mussolini had already done in Italy but with vastly more resources to grab than the Italians or Germans had),, and the Cold War up until Reagan got the Russians to implode. And then Bush didn't know what to do next so Clinton came along and (for bags full of currency) aligned New Deal socialism with "Confucian" Communism. And that is where we are today. And lots of people like you whining about not being born rich like "Those Capitalists have."
1
@kimobrien. You're a joke. Where did you learn this bullshit? What kind of job have you ever tried to obtain? How did you work to acquire the skills for your goals? The only thing you're equipped to do is tell stupid blame-shifting stories. The middle class is shrinking because of socialism, you ignorant dope. New Deal socialism only expanded the economy to create war material and then "capitalize" on rebuilding and then defending European allies against Marxist imperialists in Russia and China. The thing is there are always more than the two false choices that you fools like to discuss. It's not "corporations" that did that. Corporations that achieve "hegemonic monopolies" can be sued by the DOJ. But they're not. Not because "corporations" have too much power but corrupt bureaucrats (like Fauci) have too much unchecked power and arrogance from sitting in protected offices where they are never held accountable for their performance deficiencies. That's socialism in a nutshell. Socialism isn't the solution. It's the problem.
1
@petunialuna4801 Are you deliberately trying to deceive or just ignorant? Communism is the prophetic "end of history" goal of Marxist socialism. Nobody has claimed that it has been achieved. The counterclaim is that it's delusional and impossible. Your "no true Scotsman" BS is rejected. If you look at the Communist Manifesto, Marx identifies clearly who he regards as Communists. Lenin was the first successful Communist revolutionary and even he pivoted from this dumb expectation of yours that End of History Communism would immediately follow the international workers' revolution. Also clearly articulated in the Communist Manifesto is the agenda for revolution. This is very clearly what they are all working on. And lying is considered necessary because, supposedly, the status quo civilization is all based on "theocratic" lies. "You just throw terms out not having a clue what they mean." This is Freudian projection on your part. We know Communism fails because every time "socialized means of production" is tried it fails completely. But they keep trying on the theory that they don't have enough control over "global capital". Communism itself is completely delusional. But you can politically activate people based on these delusions. Delusional people like you.
1
@SalMos7737 If you read the Communist Manifesto all of these things are on the agenda. Communists agitate and work towards Communism. Saying the US has too many Communists is nothing like claiming that the US has "socialized means of production". OTOH, every time some US corporation like Apple offshores it's production to Communist China, that is End of History Communism according to Marxist philosophy because by law all Chinese activities are controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. So, US corporations under guidance of Congress, the Administrative state and certain Presidents since FDR have been gradually shifting to the "socialized means of production" since the Marshall Plan. And that itself was supposed to be a bulwark against (Russian) "Communism" by helping European allies rebuild under a centrally-planned economic model.
1
@kimobrien. Uh, no. That's not what happened. And there were lots of Communists in Asia and still are. But Asians seem to be a lot more intelligent about it and there are very few revolutionary Communists in Asia. It's obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about and don't even really know the stupid academic Marxist talking points well enough to convince anyone else.
1
@kimobrien. "Most of these private companies get their mineral wealth in a deal with the government of the land area. Just becasue you own the land above doesn't mean you own what's down below." Wow. Way to pay attention. Where did you go to school?
1
The essential problem must be easy to describe. Try this: Marxism is a silly cult that teaches people that feel "oppressed" how to justify these feelings and use them self-righteously to argue for "property rights reforms" to the point of "socialized means of production" or as far as they can get without taking any personal responsibility for creating and accumulating wealth without coercion. It also teaches that those that disagree are "unwoke" AKA relying on "false consciousness" and similar dogmatic "woke" memes. Critical Theory Marxism even has the worst criminals feeling self righteous about "rebellion against the machine" as they paint themselves mendaciously as "Robin Hoods" (more like robbing hoods are needed. Also seen as "black bloc"). This framework can help you understand every pet (aka victim classification) of Communists like Gavin Newsom that pretend to be something other than braindead Communists.
1