Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "The Young Black Conservatives of Trump’s America" video.

@BlakeBigfoot Citation needed.
11
@MordredSimp There is no "two party system." There's a public education system that has been rigged to make people feel dependent on government that supposedly pays for it all. That's the root problem. The first step is school vouchers, which Democrats oppose. Democrats also opposed paring back the Administrative state that grew all through the Cold War. Now it's just "norms" that we have all of those idiots in protected "careerist" jobs, often blatantly plotting against the interests of the actual voting taxpayers.
6
@kibskibs498 You're an idiot. That's not what evolution means. If Republicans are now Democrats what does that make Democrats? Democrats freed the slaves or something? You morons are pathetic Gaslighters. Democratic Party slavers turned to PC elitism, now called "Progressivism." That means "master" has to get you to vote them in to power before they tell you what to do and what to think as they run all of your schools and "equality" wealth transfer programs.
3
His bias was subtle but clearly discernible. He needs to be checked on that.
3
@TheEastside661 Reality: The Republican Party doesn't pander for votes with ever-increasing wealth transfer schemes.
2
@2UNIEK They got the "disenfranchised" vote by accident from New Deal interventionism and mostly "conservative" lawsuits when the Jim Crow types locked them out of it. Most of the ultimate beneficiaries just liked the wealth transfer schemes (tax the middle class to hand out to lower middle class and poor voters).
2
@TheEastside661 If you can't explain what it is that CA does right you're obviously not part of it and obviously will have no idea what will happen when it's gone. Because it is. CA is riding on fumes. China is taking over "silicon" and the big dollar entertainment (and propaganda) industries. Don't be surprised when Texas outpaces CA, especially when "social media" and Apple Computer profits collapse.
2
" Donal Trumps has had his awful past with race discrimination early in his Real Estate Career." Not really. At worst he had agents that "red lined" some properties and they settled with the DOJ and paid the fines. That's not exactly "white supremacy" and there's no evidence at all that it had anything to do with Trump personally. Red lining is also a controversial charge because sometimes it's from ordinary bigotry (as you seem to think) but statistically it's mostly about...statistics. That's why lawsuit after lawsuit led to lowering of lending standards and eventually just about anyone could claim anything on a home loan. That's why we had the "banking meltdown" 10 years ago.
2
@andreanacalhoun9454 Truly. And they didn't even give it to anyone but other whites until they were sued. It took decades from FDR to the Civil Rights Act to finally provide enough tools to force Democrats to stop being such blatant racists.
1
@TheEastside661 You're an idiot. You're creating tropes from nothing. Most Trump supporters know exactly what he's promising. The most important agenda is restoring the Federal judiciary to its proper Constitutional role. Only Democratic Party traitors have slowed that down but in the end it's way ahead of schedule.
1
@TheEastside661 You're being chastised for your own good, not for the sake of "conservatives."
1
@TheEastside661 I'm from CA, idiot. I helped build it and I saw it transition from high tech focus to "post industrial" idiocy in a matter of maybe 10 years. There's a reason it's now all "social media" in Silly Con Valley. There's been no significant innovation from "tech" in the past 20 years. It's just getting cheaper and it's more often than not being shipped from China. And the IP is "transferred" through coercive means, often downright theft and industrial espionage. You seem to like playing the Ben Dover game, for some reason.
1
For some reason the most brilliant conservative and libertarian thought leaders tend to be "black." I don't know why so many "whites" get bitten by the Progressive elitist bug, falling in line with Marxist bullshit and then when they realize they're being Gaslight they're still too shy to shout down the liars. That's why Trump won. He at least is unafraid of shouting down elitist liars.
1
@SuperWolfkin Conservatism has never been racist. Conservatism means being careful and thoughtful. You're conflating "reactionary" with conservative.
1
@Miykael0 Good thing too because there aren't many geniuses around.
1
@TheStoic84 This alludes to a false binary and it exactly the kind of mendacious logic that Progressive slavers use. Progressivism has very specific doctrines. Defining progress is what matters. Progressives define "progress" as putting teh right leaders in charge. They believe in Darwinism and "technology" as forces that must be managed "fairly." IOW< the key to "progress" is fairness, and requires "altruistic elites" that understand the mystical truth of Darwinian "science" and what Dawkins now calls "the selfish gene." You might also call it scientific demagoguery but they usuall just call it "social justice' now. The republic view of "progress" is driven by liberty under the rule of law. They absolutely have always focused on threats to liberty under the rule of law. Equal application of the law must be absolute and transparent to maintain those stated values and standards. Slavery was always a threat to the rule of law. Anything that threatens any human's due process rights is a threat to the entire republic. Hence "republican progress" is defined by defending the Consitution's values, not by raising taxes and paying for controversial "welfare" programs. However, paying for "safety net" social programs, and vetting them seriously, is supportive of liberty under the rule of law because it is absolutely possible for factions to become disenfranchised permanently by institutions other than slavery. The legitimate questions always pertain to how to solve those problems without causing worse.
1
@Minoritynomad Yeah, but it's an active process and you can have a strategy to "pick a side" when it comes to binary choices but also to foster better choices for the future. I would like to see the Republican Party splinter once the Democratic Party has been completely destroyed. Why would anyone think it's a good idea to maintain the party that fought to defend slavery and has only "repented" by promising to keep raising taxes and handing out some of it to "the poor" while making themselves richer and more powerful, not to mention the constant lies?
1
@mistereearly1141 Rand is infinitely better than his father.
1
Wrong, they did not block his policies. You must be high. The only slowed a few things down, like amnesty for illegals.
1
Why not split the party? As long as the party of slavery, the Democratic Party, is destroyed in the process. That's what matters.
1