Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "CNN" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 3
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30.  @mykofreder1682  Explain your reasoning. What do they gain from having their own nuclear deterrent? They're going to force their way in to new trade deals? Show that they don't rely on China for security? Force us and others to end trade sanctions? How exactly does anyone gain from from NK having its own nuclear deterrent? Even China favors NK as a "rogue threat" rather than as a de facto nuclear state. You people all talk endless bullshit but never demonstrate that you know anything. "If Trump can withdraw most Korean troops and get full denuclearization verified by at minimum China, he would have accomplished something only at that point. More likely Trump will withdraw troops, since a peace deal and Kim will promise to never their nuclear weapons." That's insane. The only real threat from NK is that they act as a de facto vanguard actor for China, in various overt and covert ways. China is in no way the good guy (state) here. We have to show diplomatic restraint in allowing China to pretend to be the good guys but we don't trust China any more than we trust NK. Are you joking? "All things remaining unchanged on the North Korean side, they and Kim will be the only ones that can be called a winner in everything Trump has done." The only party that wants to claim victory (and allow others to claim victory) while keeping conditions the same is China. If NK can't begin to trade directly with developed nations they will continue to reply on China to keep their elites alive and that also means keeping the military fed. Everything else will continue to suffer. The NK elite know that the status quo leads only to history recording them as selfish losers and puppets of China. Staying alive is good, yes, but they dream about keeping their power and actually bringing more prosperity to their nation. They can't do that under the status quo and they now realize that relying on China in this way is a dead end and nothing more. The main impediment to this new paradigm is China. And NK knows it. How stupid do you think those people are? You think they sit around and do nothing all day but watch CNN while eating bon bons and Doritos?
    1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33.  @macktaylor7838  You're obviously a total moron with no substantial point to make. It's empty rhetoric because he's trying to appeal to both Constitutionalists and Progressives and ends up saying nothing meaningful. You have no idea what the controversies are. Probably Comey doesn't either. If you can explain the controversies with any kind of acumen at all then I will demonstrate how he's doing nothing but equivocating and using demagogic appeals to shore up his image as some kind of Social Justice messiah. Perhaps I need to look up the definition of empty for you. And then I'll look up fact for you. He's not a "private citizen that knows the justice system" except as a confused idiot that implies that he has a special "moral compass" and therefore his feelings and reports are supposed to be "authoritative" and stuff. Lap it up, moron. Lap it up. He doesn't even understand that the first principle of the rule of law in divided government is that everyone must be regarded as partisan until all legitimate arguments have been vetted and synthesized according to the Constitution's enforceable framework. That's what our legal system is supposed to do. Everything that he says in public demonstrates that Comey is a deluded moron. I understand why you "relate" to him. Also, he's a terminated FBI Director. The issue isn't whether he's a "private citizen" or not because all of the accusations against him pertain to his flawed (and possibly criminal) execution of his duties as FBI Director. IOW, "private citizen" just means that he's been fired and he's being investigated as a disgraced ex-employee.
    1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38.  @macktaylor7838  Moron, Morons have low functional IQs. Incorrigible means that you're unteachable. It's not the same thing except that in adults both can be changed by resolving your idiotic attitude when you start to purge the things that are not true that you think you know to be true. Get it? An example would be a child that tests normal in IQ and then learns dogmas from his school that he thinks are "settled science" doctrines and then this same child responds to the carrot and stick PC tools to get you idiots to go along with your pseudo-scientific cult. The functional IQ of the "unskilled and unaware of it" will drop. Combining IQ testing and "unskilled and unaware" (Dunning Kruger style) studies tells us that PC academic doctrines make you functionally retarded and yet overconfident in your cognition skills. That's you. And many others. The solution is to confront idiots to change the "market incentives" for people that continuously double down on stupidity, as you do. PC compliance isn't smart. Going along with popular fads in politics and employing dogmatic answers when you don't even understand the questions is just investing in idiocy. That's what you do. Case in point: What did you learn from your conversation with me that you started by suggesting that I'm ignorant about what rhetoric means, what legal duties are, and how Comey is in legal jeopardy for violating his duties (more than just "bad judgment") as Director of the FBI? You have learned nothing so far. You're not even smart enough to know when to thank someone that is helping you. And you probably think that IQ is a stable thing that is tied to the human genome when it's not. The root problem is your attitude and you have it bad.
    1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. '...was that comment directed towards me? If so, that didn't make any logical sense.' Did you refer to anyone as a traitor just for defending enforceable speech/expression rights? The OP did. However, you did come pretty close. I didn't call you a traitor because you didn't use that language. However, your analysis is almost as flawed as the OP's. Did you write this? "@Six Yeah the British flag is part of history tooooo, wonder why no one fly's that flag? Own IT! the flag is racially motivated it's not about preserving history. History is preserved in BOOKS and MUSEUMS, not hanging off the front porch crying about birth rates. These same people have the nerve to get mad at someone taking a knee when the National Anthem is played. Hello the rebels were against America as a whole, they were against what our great country is today. They were fucking traitors, and you want to stand behind that shit? It is the "UNITED STATES" that's what makes us great. If you want to glorify a time when we were divided, why don't you divide your ass from "MY" country. Yeah the one I actually fought for, you fake ass patriot! There is a big difference between remembering history and glorifying it. General Lee didn't want statues of members of the confederate army. He also said put the rebel flag up and never take it back out because it would be a sign of treason! You talk about preserving history, but it takes a "BLACK" man to tell you about "YOUR" history you and many people conveniently ignore! Go back and study your history, it's 2018 this information is out there." Yeah, a lot of people in America fly the British flag(s). WTF are you talking about? The only problem is replacing the US flag with another, disparaging it openly, or flying an enemy flag during a time of war.
    1
  88. "It is a traitors flag on top of supporting slavery. " Moron, I did not say that I support any historical movement or symbols. I pointed out that when milestones are reached and wars end these histories become past and people have evolving and complicated views. If those views of history are a problem for me I don't use childish shaming. I offer appeals to the intellect in order to change minds, not shame 'forbidden behavior' so that the morons go away and organize behind my back as Victicrats. You do not even know how to effectively defend your own interests. Your behavior does not lead to changing of minds or personal growth. It is divisive and regressive. "The choice is still there so the crap about free expression is just some more BS. " The legal doctrine of free expression is rooted in the moral doctrine of offering honest arguments to defeat flawed ideas. I did not reference the legal doctrine. "Attacking what that flag represents, is not a straw man." If you cite history and cite your own feelings as your own feelings that is not inherently fallacious. When you cite your own feelings to project what some symbol means in a universal sense (claim) that is inherently fallacious. That is related to "straw man fallacy" when you project your own feelings to condemn others without sufficient evidence other than your own claims. "#Swastika how many people still see that as a religious symbol?" I don't know. But it was a religious symbol long before the Nazis worked it in to their stupid iconography. The point is that icons and images only have the power that you give them. Again, if I see someone IMO using symbols stupidly I call them out intellectually. "That's what it started as," Right. "...until Hitler got a hold to it and changed it's meaning forever." No, he did not change its meaning. He used it for his own ends. But it doesn't actually mean anything until humans define it. It's just a symbol. It's really just a simple framework for a symbol. The symbol itself has absolutely no power until you and other triggered fools give it power. During the postwar tribunals did they charge people for flashing that symbol? No. Because in the end it's irrelevant. The symbol itself has no power not handed over willingly. You choose to allow it to trigger you. "Ideologies are tied to symbols if you embrace the symbol you embrace the ideology." That's incoherent logic. Tolerating free expression is NOT embracing symbols or ideology. More often than not it's the exact opposite. You simply do not see past your false binaries of "for or against Nazism" or slavery or whatever by following your strict rituals for showing allegiance to your Victicrat cult. "If I'm on Mars you must be from across the galaxy, because you clearly don't understand human behavior." I'm explaining it more clearly than you are. I understand why you're triggered. You don't even understand your own emotional reactions to symbols.
    1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1