Comments by "" (@indonesiaamerica7050) on "James Comey speaks out after closed-door hearing with lawmakers" video.

Comey is nothing but empty rhetoric. You're confused. You should research what "Unskilled and unaware of it" means.
3
salome Are you a US citizen?
1
You are a moron. It's not about "emails" but about handling government communications and intel product according to the law. Ivanka is not a Secretary of State. Ivanka is not an FBI Director. There are rules for everyone >according to role and type of communications< they deal with. What exactly do you think "classified" means? It means that there are numerous "classes" that have to be handled specifically >according to that class<. Not "classified" versus "unclassified." You people love to be lied to.
1
@Isabelle Mavendorf Moron, Clinton absolutely did have classified Top Secret and "compartmentalized" data on her "black" (illegal) data system aka "server." You call people retarded? You are "unskilled and unaware of it." Look it up.
1
@richardstella3494 Not only is it empirically proven ion theory, you can and everyone else online can find FOIA evidence production and read some of the redacted samples in PDF.
1
@jsmeswagner6104 Idiot, She "misplaced" it all. Everything that she "handled" on that illegal data center was "mishandled." The apologist claim is that she didn't send > marked classified < (weasel words and demagoguery) but she actually did send Top Secret messages but didn't correctly classify them. Hence, more counts against her, freaking idiot!
1
@followyourheart7818 First of all, it took years to even request Hillary's email to reveal that she had done those unlawful things. Second, the law requires "email" handling based on circumstances, not your idiotic stories. There is no comparison. There's no indication whatsoever that Ivanka broke the law, yet she will be investigated by the IG as a matter of SOP. Yet it's happening virtually immediately whereas Clinton wasn't even investigated by the IG until AFTER she left the State Department. Third, based on the various interim reports, we already know that Clinton is a felon. Unlike ordinary criminals, public official scan be scrutinized in public separately from being charged and indicted by ordinary prosecutors. There's already more than enough published evidence to charge and try her. You're spreading completely idiotic, angry bullshit. You should be ashamed of yourself. All of you moronic gossips should be ashamed of yourselves but you're not even educated well enough to consider your own idiocy.
1
@macktaylor7838 You're incapable? rhetoric (n.) early 14c., from Old French rethorique, from Latin rhetorice, from Greek rhetorike techne "art of an orator," from rhetor (genitive rhetoros) "speaker, orator, teacher of rhetoric," related to rhesis "speech," rhema "word, phrase, verb," literally "that which is spoken," from PIE *wre-tor-, from root *were- (3) "to speak" (source also of Old English word, Latin verbum, Greek eirein "to say;" You're welcome, moron.
1
@macktaylor7838 You're obviously a total moron with no substantial point to make. It's empty rhetoric because he's trying to appeal to both Constitutionalists and Progressives and ends up saying nothing meaningful. You have no idea what the controversies are. Probably Comey doesn't either. If you can explain the controversies with any kind of acumen at all then I will demonstrate how he's doing nothing but equivocating and using demagogic appeals to shore up his image as some kind of Social Justice messiah. Perhaps I need to look up the definition of empty for you. And then I'll look up fact for you. He's not a "private citizen that knows the justice system" except as a confused idiot that implies that he has a special "moral compass" and therefore his feelings and reports are supposed to be "authoritative" and stuff. Lap it up, moron. Lap it up. He doesn't even understand that the first principle of the rule of law in divided government is that everyone must be regarded as partisan until all legitimate arguments have been vetted and synthesized according to the Constitution's enforceable framework. That's what our legal system is supposed to do. Everything that he says in public demonstrates that Comey is a deluded moron. I understand why you "relate" to him. Also, he's a terminated FBI Director. The issue isn't whether he's a "private citizen" or not because all of the accusations against him pertain to his flawed (and possibly criminal) execution of his duties as FBI Director. IOW, "private citizen" just means that he's been fired and he's being investigated as a disgraced ex-employee.
1
@macktaylor7838 Moron, Comey displays no knowledge of the law. He alludes to "norms" as if he's confused. He obviously doesn't understand the differences in enforceable duties between law enforcement officers, prosecutors and defense attorneys. If he understood those distinct duties he would be able to distinguish what a "reasonable prosecutor" might think versus a defense attorney's legal doctrines in explaining his obstruction pertaining to the Clinton and related cases. His "authority" is always either his intuition or his "leadership team." He also has every selfish motive to continue to lie to the public and deceive little morons like you with equivocation. And what do you have other than worship of stupid liars on video and inane snark directed at people that attempt to school you? Nothing. You don't even know what factual means, you stupid and incorrigible moron. Look up moron while you're at it, moron.
1
@macktaylor7838 Poor baby can't come up with anything but idiotic whinges. You started and ended with idiotic snark and have demonstrated nothing but irrational loyalty to stories that you can't even understand. You don't even know what fiduciary duties are. But you must be a genius because I brutally exposed your incorrigible idiocy. Interesting logic you have.
1
@macktaylor7838 You're useless.
1
@macktaylor7838 Moron, Convincing morons of something, or anything, isn't a standard. You're not even fit to sit on a jury. What has been revealed in this conversation is your very low functional IQ. Did you have time to look up moron in your dictionary?
1
@macktaylor7838 Moron, Morons have low functional IQs. Incorrigible means that you're unteachable. It's not the same thing except that in adults both can be changed by resolving your idiotic attitude when you start to purge the things that are not true that you think you know to be true. Get it? An example would be a child that tests normal in IQ and then learns dogmas from his school that he thinks are "settled science" doctrines and then this same child responds to the carrot and stick PC tools to get you idiots to go along with your pseudo-scientific cult. The functional IQ of the "unskilled and unaware of it" will drop. Combining IQ testing and "unskilled and unaware" (Dunning Kruger style) studies tells us that PC academic doctrines make you functionally retarded and yet overconfident in your cognition skills. That's you. And many others. The solution is to confront idiots to change the "market incentives" for people that continuously double down on stupidity, as you do. PC compliance isn't smart. Going along with popular fads in politics and employing dogmatic answers when you don't even understand the questions is just investing in idiocy. That's what you do. Case in point: What did you learn from your conversation with me that you started by suggesting that I'm ignorant about what rhetoric means, what legal duties are, and how Comey is in legal jeopardy for violating his duties (more than just "bad judgment") as Director of the FBI? You have learned nothing so far. You're not even smart enough to know when to thank someone that is helping you. And you probably think that IQ is a stable thing that is tied to the human genome when it's not. The root problem is your attitude and you have it bad.
1
Comey doesn't even know what the rule of law means. He breaks the law in the name of preserving "the rule of law" just because it is one of the coopted mantras of that DC cult.
1
@ @dancogswell269 Who do you think you are? You're ignorant and confused. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. I'm credentialed and qualified to audit all of these idiots. I'm one of the few people capable of walking you or anyone else through the technical and legal issues from a prosecutor's or defense attorney's view of these issues (hence, also from a judge's perspective). Fuck you and your idiotic "Russia" memes. You have no idea how to defend the US Constitution, if you've ever even read it. You stupid POS traitor. Freudian projection: Dan Cogswell 9 minutes ago last call, I see you still do not grasp the idea of having a point to make in your remarks. Don't they have some kind of training program there in st petersburg? Perhaps you should just read comments for a while, so you will see how people exchange ideas, and debate each other. Then after several years you may understand your job better. Thank you for your time.
1
@dancogswell269 This is something you imagine to be related to critical thinking or "science" or something? Dan Cogswell 21 hours ago last call, you certainly seem interested in sodomy, are you a pervert of some kind? If you are not, drop the stupid comments, and try to make a coherent point, or go back to fox.
1
We know that they're lying when we catch them in lies. Some of us know how to read the FOIA-derived evidence. Some of us know how to audit our own government and its claims. Comey is the epitome of the Peter Principle in government. I can't say that he's lying because I don't know that he's smart enough to know it himself. They're all such ignoramuses that only know how to defend Brain Trust dogmas. Functionally, Comey is an idiot. He says things that are false, constantly. His "leadership team" is corrupt and probably just as deluded. They're a bunch of cry-bullies. They probably do feel persecuted as they defend their own power to abuse the public trust and protect corrupt politicians that also feel persecuted because they're feel that they're just oppressed Social Justice warriors and delusional crap like that.
1
@Manuela Costa Lima You're talking gibberish. Why can't you define and or defend patriotism in objective fashion? Because you're incapable. You have no standards. You just have an intuitive sense of who your enemy is and you're wholly incapable of thinking for yourself. You're a collectivist lunatic. You can't even define "values of democracy" in your own words. And the gold standard for US law and "values of the republic" is NOT "law and order" but "the rule of law." I'm 100% confident that you have no idea what either term means and hence you have no hope of explaining the differences. Yet you see yourself as "enlightened" with respect to "Trump supporters." You're an idiot. Learn about your blind spots first before you launch ignorant rants.
1
@markgreen4612 Moron, The gold standard is "the rule of law" not law and order. Checks and balances is not having traitorous underlings violating civil rights under the color of law and then braying about "institutions and stuff" to trigger you socialist idiots. Comey derived his power from the EB. The President runs the EB. Comey could only lawfully launch initiatives under Presidential powers. The moment Trump was sworn in he had specific duties to report all such initiatives to Trump. He failed to do so because of "reasons" that he's trying to justify to this day. And Comey has also failed to cooperate with Constitutional oversight powers of Congress. YOu love traitors. I find it hard to believe that you love patriots or even know what it means to defend the US Constitution and its democratic institutions. Congress checks presidential powers in all matters. The courts may protected selected petitioners. States may sue the Federal EB in certain realms. That's checks and balances. Lying traitors holding press conferences with corporate media (and their transnational owners and interests) is NOT checks and balances. The voting public is to check the government through the Constitutional levers of power. You know NOTHING that is true.
1
No. You are a liar. The intelligence agencies are not lying. The political leaders are lying. The evidence itself is not hard to read for those trained to do so. Neither is the law that governs "cybersecurity." It is all of the people speaking to the press with weasel words and mendacious summaries that are lying in increments and by the time you morons parse it the lies become complete.
1
Like you'd know.
1
@merlin8537 They are using a different lexicon. But they are not the intelligent ones. Neither are you. If you don't recognize precisely how they are using doublespeak to promote an agenda and a particular worldview you are one of the idiots. They're straight out of Orwell's Animal Farm and you don't even know who the Pigs are.
1