Comments by "Mikhail M" (@mikhailmik) on "Ukraine dam: Russia accuses Ukraine, as expert warns of more attacks on infrastructure" video.

  1. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    4
  2. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    2
  3. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    2
  4. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    2
  5.  @harryhewitt6795  Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    2
  6. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    1
  7. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    1
  8.  @Teetea2973  To understand how the EU countries are waging war against Russia, here is a good example: In Slovakia, ex-Minister of Justice Stefan Garabin is being tried for daring to write the following phrase on social networks: "if I were Putin in Ukraine, I would have done the same thing." Now he faces up to 3 years in prison, because Stefan, in fact, opposed the actions of NATO troops in Ukraine and publicly supported Russia. Such is the "freedom of speech in American", the level of terror of the local population, which asks uncomfortable questions and has a different point of view in the European Union is growing.
    1
  9.  @BahWeepGranahWeepNiniBong  🐖💨💥🔥🌋
    1
  10. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    1
  11. The dam is controlled halfway from both sides of the Dnieper bank by both sides of the conflict. There is already a video of how artillery strikes are delivered, and then the water did its job and washed away further.
    1
  12.  @Teetea2973  To understand how the EU countries are waging war against Russia, here is a good example: In Slovakia, ex-Minister of Justice Stefan Garabin is being tried for daring to write the following phrase on social networks: "if I were Putin in Ukraine, I would have done the same thing." Now he faces up to 3 years in prison, because Stefan, in fact, opposed the actions of NATO troops in Ukraine and publicly supported Russia. Such is the "freedom of speech in American", the level of terror of the local population, which asks uncomfortable questions and has a different point of view in the European Union is growing.
    1
  13. Explains everything from a military point of view. Ukraine suffers losses and needs reserves. She removes them from the Kherson direction, exposing him. To be safe, it blows up a dam to complicate the crossing of a water barrier and builds defensive structures. The Ukrainian troops have an advantage on the banks of the Dnieper, since their bank is higher, hence the answer. Undermining is not beneficial for Russia, the controlled Kakhovka, villages and villages with Russian citizens are flooded, their property is destroyed, thousands of people are deprived of their homes, and the line of defense of the Russian Federation on the coast and the exposed minefields are washed away. Great environmental damage is caused to the fields and territory of the Russian Federation, crop areas and farms. So who benefited from the undermining? Stop showing lies and propaganda. The military department officially reported on the involvement of the Kyiv regime and the British special services, in view of the loss in the counteroffensive, at least we will inflict material damage, so that the Russians do not get the hydroelectric power station and create a catastrophe and pay more attention. Even last year, Russian intelligence assumed the destruction of the dam by blows, therefore, in order not to fall into a trap, it transferred military forces to the other side. There were videos from surveillance cameras showing artillery and MLRS strikes on the dam, so it was not an explosion.
    1