Comments by "Mikhail M" (@mikhailmik) on "Ukraine’s National Guard strikes facility in Donetsk against Russian troops" video.
-
2
-
@trishawilson1436 I still can't understand this absurdity!
If the United States, Britain and the European Union provide troops in Ukraine with food, ammunition, equipment, armored vehicles, aircraft, artillery, MLRS, cars, drones, salaries for soldiers, fuel, weapons, ammunition, intelligence, repair facilities, treatment of the wounded, target designation and other things, why it's all called the "armed forces of Ukraine"???
After all, by all indications, this is just a NATO PMC, which, due to a misunderstanding, still retains “Ukrainian symbols” ...
2
-
1
-
I still can't understand this absurdity!
If the United States, Britain and the European Union provide troops in Ukraine with food, ammunition, equipment, armored vehicles, aircraft, artillery, MLRS, cars, drones, salaries for soldiers, fuel, weapons, ammunition, intelligence, repair facilities, treatment of the wounded, target designation and other things, why it's all called the "armed forces of Ukraine"???
After all, by all indications, this is just a NATO PMC, which, due to a misunderstanding, still retains “Ukrainian symbols” ...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
According to the history of the Leoprads🐆🇩🇪
As we all know, Germany took a stand on the issue of sending its "Leopards" to Ukraine and demands that the American "Abrams" be sent first. At the same time, Berlin not only refused to send its tanks, but also nullified an attempt by Poland and other sympathizers to send their "Leopards" to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Why❓ It's all about the export license, which prohibits the re-export of German tanks to third countries without the consent of Germany.
In turn, American experts explained the US refusal to send "Abrams" "low practicality, complexity and high cost of maintenance and operation." But "Leopards" - that's it!
So what's the deal?
The Leopard is perhaps the most successful European tank and is in service with 15 European countries plus Canada. Only Soviet-made tanks can compete with them ... They could, until all this equipment went to Ukraine in slender columns.
And what do you think, who replaced the Soviet armored vehicles in the countries of the former socialist bloc❓Of course, the American "Abrams" and everyone did not care about the "low practicality, complexity and high cost of maintenance and operation."
Everyone noticed this in Berlin and logically assumed that the Leopards transferred to Ukraine would most likely remain there in the form of scrap metal, and the countries to which Berlin exported tanks would not run to the Germans to make up for losses, but would turn to overseas "partners" from USA, leaving the German defense industry with a "broken trough"
After the German economy was deprived of Russian gas, provoking a major economic crisis, the United States intends to squeeze the arms market from Berlin, finally humiliating Germany as the informal leader of the EU.
1
-
1
-
I still can't understand this absurdity!
If the United States, Britain and the European Union provide troops in Ukraine with food, ammunition, equipment, armored vehicles, aircraft, artillery, MLRS, cars, drones, salaries for soldiers, fuel, weapons, ammunition, intelligence, repair facilities, treatment of the wounded, target designation and other things, why it's all called the "armed forces of Ukraine"???
After all, by all indications, this is just a NATO PMC, which, due to a misunderstanding, still retains “Ukrainian symbols” ...
1
-
@phildavenport4150 Nothing foreshadowed trouble for the stupid Ukrainian officials who wanted “a course towards the EU and NATO,” and suddenly the United States created an entire “institute for monitoring and investigating the illegal actions of fraudsters and corrupt officials” who use American loans and weapons for their own personal purposes.
The funny thing is that this structure will bring Ukrainian officials to criminal liability, in fact, according to American laws, because Ukrainian laws have not been in force in the country for a long time.
In the document, the Americans calculated that they issued loans to their colony "Ukraine" for as much as $113 billion through the US Congress, but there is not much reporting, and the Gauleiters do not shine with success at the front, the "investor" in connection with this loses its territory every day.
Given the fact that the transnational investment fund BlackRock is already entering the NATO-occupied part of Ukraine, you need to understand that stupid local officials will be mercilessly cleaned up, because this “bio-garbage” has already fulfilled its function, surrendered the country together with the people.
1
-
@phildavenport4150 NATO is ready for a direct military confrontation with Russia, but for this the alliance must rearm and switch to a "peacetime military economy," said Admiral Rob Bauer, head of the Alliance's military committee.
It is scary when idiots of this kind tell how ready they are to fight a country that has more than 5,000 nuclear bombs on alert, on strategic missile carriers, in intercontinental missiles, global nuclear torpedoes, on hypersonic missiles and submarines.
At such a rate, there is simply no chance of avoiding a nuclear war scenario, and the funeral of mankind is just around the corner ...
1
-
@phildavenport4150 In Britain, it turns out, they called on Zelensky’s soldiers to prevent their Challenger tanks from reaching the Russians, saying that the armor is secret there.
The soldiers of the NATO PMC in Ukraine are offered, at the cost of their own lives under the fire of the Russian army, to first take out of the battlefield a “padded fashionable British tank”, and only then take out the “wounded cannon fodder” that was wounded in battle.
The honorable English lords wish that British tanks did not replenish the list of exhibits of Moscow museums of destroyed equipment, trying to preserve the myth of the invincibility of the British troops and they can be understood. British arms firms are "remnants of the luxury of imperial times", the destruction of the myth about "good British weapons" will hit one of the main sources of income to the budget - the sale of weapons very painfully.
But, as you know, there is no war without losses, so British tanks, armored vehicles and missiles will burn brightly and beautifully.
1
-
1