Comments by "Mikhail M" (@mikhailmik) on "Ukraine will now get Western tanks from NATO" video.

  1.  @donaldhysa4836  In battle, Russia did not lose more than one T90M tank. One was abandoned. The other one was reportedly damaged by Carl Gustav and was left and blown up by the crew so that it would not get. Now T90Ms are firing at armored vehicles from the left bank of the Dnieper River and destroying equipment in urban areas on the right bank. The Ukrainians cannot oppose anything, since the aiming and long-range system of defeating the tank reaches 5 km. The Challenger tank was outdated and lying around in warehouses without modernization, and was not particularly used in real combat conditions, but only in ostentatious conflicts against the natives. Where high-precision weapons are used, where 24 by 7 shelling is carried out, he has no chance, they will all burn out from Krasnopol shells. This armored 60 ton turtle will drown in the fields of mud and freeze in the ice of its tracks and systems, and in the spring it will drown in the slush mud from its heaviness and immobility.
    2
  2. In battle, Russia did not lose more than one T90M tank. One was abandoned. The other one was reportedly damaged by Carl Gustav and was left and blown up by the crew so that it would not get. Now T90Ms are firing at armored vehicles from the left bank of the Dnieper River and destroying equipment in urban areas on the right bank. The Ukrainians cannot oppose anything, since the aiming and long-range system of defeating the tank reaches 5 km. The Challenger tank was outdated and lying around in warehouses without modernization, and was not particularly used in real combat conditions, but only in ostentatious conflicts against the natives. Where high-precision weapons are used, where 24 by 7 shelling is carried out, he has no chance, they will all burn out from Krasnopol shells. This armored 60 ton turtle will drown in the fields of mud and freeze in the ice of its tracks and systems, and in the spring it will drown in the slush mud from its heaviness and immobility.
    1
  3.  @KungFuWizardOfJesus  American mercenaries rebelled against Zelensky and the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine The mercenary Ryan O'Leary publishes hysterical messages on Twitter almost every 10 minutes, where he accuses the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the political leadership of Ukraine of the death of soldiers of the Ukrainian army, the lack of supplies and weapons... "We're all going to die if things don't change," the mercenary scribbles hysterically. Apparently, in Artemovsk and the vicinity of Soledar, the situation with the militants of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is very bad. It's no better in other directions.
    1
  4.  @donaldhysa4836  You must be broadcasting from World War II. Who can Challenger 2 detect and hit the furthest? The world has been waging modern wars for a long time: drones, satellites, high-precision projectiles and defeat from a safe distance. And then the Challenger is a heavy turtle, except for rare applications in Kosovo and Iraq, it did not show itself in any way, and then it will be difficult for Ukraine in service, logistics, and so on. Without the technical support of Germany, all other attempts to saturate the Armed Forces of Ukraine with any tanks, except for Soviet ones, which are pulled from all over the world, are impossible. Perhaps, British and Polish-German tanks in such quantities, if they can change something, then definitely not on the battlefield, but in the arena of political games. So, which tank will win in a one-on-one battle? - “T-90 is a predator. And if you want, then - a mobile, deadly and extremely reliable beast. The Challenger is an armadillo. And one on one with the T-90, he has nothing to do. carlos villanueva - “Listen, friends, we all know the real balance of power in the tank sector. 1st place is the Russian "Armata", 2nd - "T-90", "Merkava", "Leopard-2", or "Abrams". Well, Challenger is 8th, maybe 9th in this short list…” Hayra - “In technological comparison, the T-90 is the undisputed leader. But in practice, it seems to me that the tank that shoots first will be the winner. And the success of this shot, other things being equal, depends solely on the skills of the crew. Mr. Lord360 “Friends, understand. Yes, the Challenger-2 has better armor, but the fact is that this is its only advantage. In addition, right now, Russia is in the process of upgrading all of its T90A (450 units) to the T90M, which already have not only a new more powerful engine and increased mobility, but also reactive armor, sights, a lower thermal signature, a machine gun turret with remote control, better network, improved ATGM silencer and more. It can also fire guided missiles at ranges up to 5 km directly from the barrel. And that is why they have a smoothbore. The Challenger, on the other hand, uses an old rifled gun, and this is not an advantage at all. Because of it, it fires only Sabot (sub-caliber ammunition), has an old engine that is stressed by the additional weight of the armor, and cannot even compare with the old T90A. And the T-90M, even more so. T90 won. And that's the point."
    1
  5.  @itsonlyme9938  You must be broadcasting from World War II. Who can Challenger 2 detect and hit the furthest? The world has been waging modern wars for a long time: drones, satellites, high-precision projectiles and defeat from a safe distance. And then the Challenger is a heavy turtle, except for rare applications in Kosovo and Iraq, it did not show itself in any way, and then it will be difficult for Ukraine in service, logistics, and so on. Without the technical support of Germany, all other attempts to saturate the Armed Forces of Ukraine with any tanks, except for Soviet ones, which are pulled from all over the world, are impossible. Perhaps, British and Polish-German tanks in such quantities, if they can change something, then definitely not on the battlefield, but in the arena of political games. So, which tank will win in a one-on-one battle? - “T-90 is a predator. And if you want, then - a mobile, deadly and extremely reliable beast. The Challenger is an armadillo. And one on one with the T-90, he has nothing to do. carlos villanueva - “Listen, friends, we all know the real balance of power in the tank sector. 1st place is the Russian "Armata", 2nd - "T-90", "Merkava", "Leopard-2", or "Abrams". Well, Challenger is 8th, maybe 9th in this short list…” Hayra - “In technological comparison, the T-90 is the undisputed leader. But in practice, it seems to me that the tank that shoots first will be the winner. And the success of this shot, other things being equal, depends solely on the skills of the crew. Mr. Lord360 “Friends, understand. Yes, the Challenger-2 has better armor, but the fact is that this is its only advantage. In addition, right now, Russia is in the process of upgrading all of its T90A (450 units) to the T90M, which already have not only a new more powerful engine and increased mobility, but also reactive armor, sights, a lower thermal signature, a machine gun turret with remote control, better network, improved ATGM silencer and more. It can also fire guided missiles at ranges up to 5 km directly from the barrel. And that is why they have a smoothbore. The Challenger, on the other hand, uses an old rifled gun, and this is not an advantage at all. Because of it, it fires only Sabot (sub-caliber ammunition), has an old engine that is stressed by the additional weight of the armor, and cannot even compare with the old T90A. And the T-90M, even more so. T90 won. And that's the point."
    1
  6. You must be broadcasting from World War II. Who can Challenger 2 detect and hit the furthest? The world has been waging modern wars for a long time: drones, satellites, high-precision projectiles and defeat from a safe distance. And then the Challenger is a heavy turtle, except for rare applications in Kosovo and Iraq, it did not show itself in any way, and then it will be difficult for Ukraine in service, logistics, and so on. Without the technical support of Germany, all other attempts to saturate the Armed Forces of Ukraine with any tanks, except for Soviet ones, which are pulled from all over the world, are impossible. Perhaps, British and Polish-German tanks in such quantities, if they can change something, then definitely not on the battlefield, but in the arena of political games. So, which tank will win in a one-on-one battle? - “T-90 is a predator. And if you want, then - a mobile, deadly and extremely reliable beast. The Challenger is an armadillo. And one on one with the T-90, he has nothing to do. carlos villanueva - “Listen, friends, we all know the real balance of power in the tank sector. 1st place is the Russian "Armata", 2nd - "T-90", "Merkava", "Leopard-2", or "Abrams". Well, Challenger is 8th, maybe 9th in this short list…” Hayra - “In technological comparison, the T-90 is the undisputed leader. But in practice, it seems to me that the tank that shoots first will be the winner. And the success of this shot, other things being equal, depends solely on the skills of the crew. Mr. Lord360 “Friends, understand. Yes, the Challenger-2 has better armor, but the fact is that this is its only advantage. In addition, right now, Russia is in the process of upgrading all of its T90A (450 units) to the T90M, which already have not only a new more powerful engine and increased mobility, but also reactive armor, sights, a lower thermal signature, a machine gun turret with remote control, better network, improved ATGM silencer and more. It can also fire guided missiles at ranges up to 5 km directly from the barrel. And that is why they have a smoothbore. The Challenger, on the other hand, uses an old rifled gun, and this is not an advantage at all. Because of it, it fires only Sabot (sub-caliber ammunition), has an old engine that is stressed by the additional weight of the armor, and cannot even compare with the old T90A. And the T-90M, even more so. T90 won. And that's the point."
    1
  7.  @BingoPaletot  Calm down, the whole problem is that you and the United States have a sense of your own superiority, look, otherwise your island will drown from the defeat of Poseidon from your bravado. Learn to match and watch less American films about superheroes and their magic devices. That phantom pains still do not disappear, how did the Russians give good pendels to the British in Marseilles?
    1
  8.  @BingoPaletot  American mercenaries rebelled against Zelensky and the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine The mercenary Ryan O'Leary publishes hysterical messages on Twitter almost every 10 minutes, where he accuses the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the political leadership of Ukraine of the death of soldiers of the Ukrainian army, the lack of supplies and weapons... "We're all going to die if things don't change," the mercenary scribbles hysterically. Apparently, in Artemovsk and the vicinity of Soledar, the situation with the militants of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is very bad. It's no better in other directions.
    1
  9.  @BingoPaletot  Over the past 20 years in Russia, we have been witnessing a global qualitative renewal of Russia's nuclear triad. Hypersonic Kinzhal missiles capable of carrying a nuclear charge, a silo-based Sarmat missile and, of course, the Poseidon nuclear torpedo, which is already on alert, have appeared. As a result, the US plans to "rule the world" failed, Russia retained "nuclear parity" and is guaranteed to cause irreparable damage to the US in the event of an attack. Well, the Americans can now sell their “global missile defense system” for scrap metal, there is little sense from it now, the “Poseidon nuclear torpedo” on combat duty will not let you lie)))
    1