Comments by "DailyBeatings" (@DailyBeatings) on "Inside China Business" channel.

  1.  @Jeff.55649  It's weird that you want the last word, so I'm denying you the opportunity...🤣
    1
  2. China shows up to these Africa countries and pulls the copper out of the ground for their production, which puts money in the pockets of African governments. Why would any African nation allow the US to invest with no production and vague promises of future production?
    1
  3.  @darek795  "Americans at software." - DeepSeek-V3 says otherwise...🤣
    1
  4. DeepSeek is not going anywhere since it's open source. USG already tried this with PGP years ago, and it didn't work out too well for them...:text-green-game-over:
    1
  5.  @bracesforme3  China can change their policy to civilian use only, then loosely enforce the rules...🤣
    1
  6.  @bracesforme3  US government would need to subsidize these companies forever since they will never be competitive. Now imagine this scenario across hundreds of different supply chains that China has monopoly power?:text-green-game-over:
    1
  7.  @bracesforme3  None will catch up since China has monopoly power and can control price and quantity supplied. Economics 101...🤣
    1
  8.  @bracesforme3  There's no economic incentive for businesses to make investments into production since they can buy at the lowest price from China. The only way China can lose their monopoly power is to increase the price or decrease quantity supplied where is becomes economically viable to produce these, but then we are back to my original post...🤣
    1
  9.  @bracesforme3  Japan now has increased costs, which reduces competitiveness, and still has a 58% reliance on China for those materials. China sold the remaining 32% to other markets. Commodities are fungible and just flow to other buyers who will now enjoy a competitive advantage...🤣
    1
  10.  @bracesforme3  Control you? Was it not the US that decided to ban advanced semiconductors in the first place? What's good for the goose...🤣
    1
  11.  @bracesforme3  Switching to the control argument because you lost the economic one?🤣
    1
  12.  @bracesforme3  False equivalence since China is only retaliating. Maybe the US should take their complaint to the WTO?🤣
    1
  13.  @bracesforme3  I'm quicker than you. It pays to have a minor in economics...🤣
    1
  14.  @bracesforme3  "higher cost are better than someone trying to control you." - Those are your words, not mine...🤣
    1
  15.  @bracesforme3  Switching to the SCS because you're still losing? Sorry, won't take the bait...🤣
    1
  16.  @bracesforme3  "Because the US is already paying to start their own supply chain." - Once again the US government would need to subsidize these companies forever since they will never be competitive. This is basic economics taught in high schools and universities around the world. It's not very difficult to understand...🤣
    1
  17.  @bracesforme3  I have better things to do then wait for someone else to reply. Seems you don't...🤣
    1
  18.  @bracesforme3  Apparently not since it seems you want the last word...🤣
    1
  19.  @firstlast-pt5pp  The market share of DJI has nothing to do with the level of difficulty in buying a pre-made circuit board and loading it with a firmware.
    1
  20. There's some migrants on the southern border that can put a ladder on a wall...🤣
    1
  21. The US put a man on the moon. Now they can only put a man in the women's restroom...🤣
    1
  22. The people implementing these policies can't be that stupid. Therefore the only rational explanation is that these tariffs, sanctions, fees, etc... are just stealth taxes to fleece the average American. Why make your affluent constituents bear a tax burden when you can shift it onto the public instead?
    1
  23. The Chinese are so based at hacking, but somehow they don't know how to spoof an IP...🤣
    1
  24.  @egay86292  China: "You’re pushing your luck little man."
    1
  25. Eric Li in his discussions and presentations always illustrates that China is weak on the value chain and missing out on the bulk of profits. I believe this is why the west is so hell bent on degrading China's progress. Western attitude is "how dare they not know their place in the production cycle. We make the profits, you do the grunt work"...🤣
    1
  26.  @Usericon-nw899fp  China is behind the US in some areas while the US is behind China in other areas. Instead of making this a silly tech race the US and China should work together so these advances can benefit all of mankind...😎
    1
  27. Go back to sleep, nothing to worry about...🤣
    1
  28. Every day it seems the US is just relying on military Keynesianism to fuel future growth. Money printer go brr...🤣
    1
  29. US Treasuries are now being purchased by private foreign investors because of the high interest rates they're currently getting. According to economist Phillip Pilkington these investors, unlike purchases by foreign governments, are rate sensitive. Therefore once yields drop due to a recession foreign investors will stop buying them forcing the US trade deficit to close and US living standards to fall.
    1
  30.  @marcusclarkson5520  You reap what you sow...🤣
    1
  31. They'll just implement a small surcharge for non citizens to cover the costs, but even with this it will still be way cheaper.
    1
  32.  @yoingen  CNN or BBC will accuse China of something, so it doesn't matter what they think...🤣
    1
  33. Patients will end up six feet under because they won't be able to afford the medication...🪦
    1
  34.  @bungkusi2432  Only for those that can afford it and can travel. What about everyone else?
    1
  35.  @bungkusi2432  I guess not being able to afford the medication will solve the upcoming Social Security deficit problem?
    1
  36.  @bungkusi2432  Hubris will do that when making decisions. Eventually they'll learn some humility, hopefully before the economy is turned to dust...🤣
    1
  37. Now Mexico, Vietnam, and Thailand are increasing their economic growth and have closer ties with China all at the expense of US consumers. US sanctions, the gift that keeps on giving...🤣
    1
  38. Outbound cargo shipping costs would just increase to cover the cost of the port fees. Did anyone think these ships go back empty?🤣
    1
  39. Even if this proposal doesn't pass just the idea is persuading the next generation of Chinese researchers not to include the US as a destination for their work, so the damage is already done.
    1
  40. Al Bundy "four touchdowns in a high school football game" talk doesn't mean squat. That was then, this is now...🤣
    1
  41.  @dragonchaw6732  BYD is an innovative company. From their Blade batteries to the DM-i platform the company is revolutionizing the industry. BYD is what Henry Ford and the Model T was in 1908, which is a disruptive technology that will change the automotive landscape forever.
    1
  42. The reason it's on the front page of the WSJ is because the US is not going to war with China. It's all posturing to make China capitulation to US demands, which is not going to happen any time soon...🤪
    1
  43. The Russian Orbital Segment (ROS) controls navigation, propulsion, and life support, so basically it's the ISS...🤣
    1
  44. ISS in reality is Russian since the Russian Orbital Segment (ROS) controls navigation, propulsion, and life support. It's reason why the Russians weren't kicked out of the ISS...🤣
    1
  45.  @hclau218  China already subsidized the semiconductor industry from a 1.2 trillion technology budget allocation over the next 10 years. This information is readily available from the Chinese government. They're called government guidance funds [政府引导基金]. I've engaged my brain...🤣
    1
  46. It's not the political system that matters, but the economic system. China is a mixed economy, just like 90% of the rest of the world...🤣
    1
  47. Chinese are becoming autarkic in almost everything and building relationships outside the western sphere of influence...:face-blue-smiling:
    1
  48. ...and who is leading the world in robotics and automation...🙄
    1
  49. It's the Volkswagen Beetle for the 21st century...:text-green-game-over:
    1
  50. If congress keeps going this way in 10-20 years the US will be living in a technological ghetto...🤣
    1