Comments by "DailyBeatings" (@DailyBeatings) on "China's PLA conducts real combat training of air-to-air missiles in South China Sea" video.

Not likely since the carriers they're on would have already been sunk and sitting at the bottom of the South China Sea... 🤣😂🤣😂
8
@deanyt3697 China pushed the US back to the 38th parallel in Korea with a peasant army, and that was when the US had a stronger military.
6
@charliekirkley6593 You mean like the sea wolf that ran into a mountain while prowling in the South China Sea? If that's the case then China has nothing to worry about... 🤣😂🤣😂
5
@kevinkarbonik2928 ""We don't have any defense that could deny the employment of such a weapon against us." - US Air Force General John E. Hyten in response to a question from Senator Jim Inhofe regarding hypersonic missiles China and Russia possess.
4
@kevinkarbonik2928 ... but you would gladly get into a jet that was contracted to the lowest bidder... 🤣😂🤣😂
3
@deanyt3697 " US has power to bring war to any country’s doorstep." - Unless that country has an actual air force and competent A2/AD systems. It's the reason why the US doesn't attack Iran. Against a peer military, such as China or Russia, the US has no capability to project power.
3
@deanyt3697 Statements that can't be qualified? How convenient... 🤣😂🤣😂
1
@charliekirkley6593 Your hubris is pathetic. I have news for you, the empire is dying. Get used to it... 🤣😂🤣😂
1
@deanyt3697 Except the claim to the islands and atolls in the SCS date back to the Han Dynasty in 111 BC. Both the PRC and the ROC have almost the exact same claims (9-Dash versus the 11-Dash line). Facts are a pesky thing when you have an agenda...🤣😂🤣😂
1
@deanyt3697 The Pentagon already war gamed a conflict in the Taiwan Straits and in every scenario the US would lose. In addition you now have the alliance between China and Russia, so the "analysis" you linked is invalid. Everybody has a plan until the shooting starts... 🤣😂🤣😂
1
@deanyt3697 What do you mean rest of the world? UK and Australia perhaps. NATO would be absent, well they're useless anyway... 🤣😂🤣😂
1
@deanyt3697 Nice red herring. Whether the technology is copied or not is immaterial. I'm not here to condone the practice, which by the way the US is also guilty of doing. The simple fact is that the US can't win a conventional war against a peer military. That capability left a long time ago with their shift in training and objectives over the last 40 years. To say otherwise shows a degree of hubris and lack of knowledge on the subject.
1
@deanyt3697 Tell that to the Vietnamese or more recently the Afghans. Also Ansarullah seems to be doing rather well against Saudi aggression, and they have the latest and greatest US military hardware money can buy. A bloated military budget primarily used to enrich a handful of weapons manufacturers is no guarantee of victory.
1
@deanyt3697 It's called an active deterrent making the cost of military action by the US too great to incur. China doesn't need to spend billions on an offensive military component since they have no need. Remember it takes three times the invasion force to overcome the military of the target country. You need to actually read up on the subject before posting since your ignorance is perfectly on display.
1
@deanyt3697 PLA already has a larger navy with more modern ships versus the older class destroyers and frigates the US has in their inventory. In any case the US would not be able to reach the first island chain as China has more than enough hypersonic missiles to deny access to the area. Aircraft carriers become useless as the are either targeted or due to range the aircraft themselves cannot reach the mainland and back. US has no hypersonic capability while cruise missiles would be thwarted with the current A2/AD technology China possesses. Submarines are a problem, but China has been investing heavily in submarine detection and munitions to overcome this deficiency. China also has the logistics and manufacturing advantage once munitions are depleted. An invasion attempt by the US would cost the lives of hundreds of thousands even before they reached the mainland. You obviously have a serious lack of knowledge on the subject, otherwise you wouldn't be posting this nonsense.
1
@deanyt3697 You've moved the goalpost so many times I can't even count. Obviously you have an agenda because you can't seem to gasp the reality of the capability of both parties, therefore I'm going to end this hopeless conversation. Have a Happy New Year... ✨🌃🥂🎇
1