Comments by "n" (@user-pq4by2rq9y) on "Ticker Symbol: YOU" channel.

To their credit, they are doing it. But let's face it, if you are using your gpu for work, then it ceases to be a luxury to become a investment, and you can justify to spend a lot more.
4
Considering that amd is about to launch rdna 3, I would be buying. They aren't losing money with rdna 3, with the possibility to shift production to what is best, be a console refresh, the mobile market (where I bet they will destroy intel - that's where they actualy won marketshare) or traditional gpus, where they will be alone in the low to mid range market. That said, the market for hardware aimed at 1080p may dry up forever, considering even a 3060/6600xt will crush that resolution while a 3070 is already very capable with dlss 2.0/fsr at 1440p. And in the console side, a series s zen4/rdna3 refresh would easily crush that resolution for this gen, and we probably won't need another one. By the way, zen 4 launch only flopped because motherboard manufacturers that decided that milking am5 motherboards was a good idea. It should be a better deal than Intel 13th gen even at desktop, requiring less cooling for the same performance.
1
Whatever happens, it won't be defined in one generation. That said, I expect the laptop market to grow in the next decade and amd to grow with it because intel can't compete in battery life while nvidia's gpus will be more expensive and may even produce more heat. Not only that but AMD is working in apus with high performance graphics to release next year, a space where they don't have clear competition besides the macbook which does not run windows. Intel should be working on something similar from what I heard, but I don't see how they can compete without their 7nm process figured out. We are nearly at a point where entry level gpus will offer enough 1440p performance to make mid tier redundant. At that point, Nvidia will have their flagship standing alone while AMD will take other segments in mass, assuming things don't change.
1