Comments by "n" (@user-pq4by2rq9y) on "Electric " channel.

  1. sodium is perfect for ebikes, where packaging isn't a problem but price is.
    8
  2. Hydrogen combustion engines makes no sense for anyone. Hydrogen fuel cells are at least worth considering.
    8
  3. If 30% batteries, 70% hydrogen, yes, I would consider an FCEV. Make no mistake though, mixing hydrogen with batteries is a great danger! I am only willing to do it because I see no better option for the future.
    7
  4. Hydrogen is not great for combustion. It is great for fuel cells, and you can mix it with batteries fairly easily.
    3
  5. Hydrogen and combustion engines are just a bad call though.
    3
  6. Well, you can mix fuel cells with batteries in a ev no problem. You probably will have to refuel twice as much in a road trip but you can do it in 5 minutes
    1
  7. Novel concept here. Why not mix hydrogen fuel cells with batteries so I can charge at home and refuel it under 5 minutes. I mean, you are using electric motors for both anyway. You don't even need to charge your battery on a road trip because that fuel cell can charge the battery just fine on its own. Hydrogen is also lighter than a extra set of batteries, so you are spending less energy to move your car. Regenerative breaking, lighter fuel cells and smaller batteries all work together to reduce the weight so at the end of the day you don't need as much fuel as you normally would. ... Now, that would be a incredibly dangerous fire hazard much like hydrogen itself so... maybe worth a shot?
    1
  8.  @53XM4CH1N3  personally, I favor cng plug-in hybrids instead. Huge positive impact on emissions* and something we can easily implement today. At the end of its battery life, we can always go for a upgrade and turn it into a full time EV for all practical purposes, when battery technology is ready for it. Did I also talk about how natgas is cheaper than petrol? Obs.: more than using these batteries on EVs, for sure, and yes, more than hydrogen as well because: 1- hydrogen production isn’t clean yet; 2- even if it was, it will take more time for widespread adoption. Possibly a few decades instead of a few years. But of course we will never even consider this approach because it isn’t labelled "net zero".
    1