Comments by "n" (@user-pq4by2rq9y) on "Sandboxx" channel.

  1. I am skeptical that it can do some things the army wants it to do well but I think the army took that it consideration as well. Plus the V-280 isn’t a osprey, it is an evolution, a matured design, something the defiant isn’t. Believe it or not, it may be a little less complex as well.
    12
  2. There is no reason to have its engine on all the time though. Drones are already good gliders and I would imagine that this thing would be even better since it could use AI to calculate currents most suited to generate lift. I mean, perhaps it is a bit far fetched but that's what I would do to make that aircraft fly as long as possible with minimal signature.
    2
  3. I have another question for you, what if a foreign adversary manages to knock out gps satelittes?
    1
  4. There are moves to make the hellfire more cost-effective and I don't see why it won't spread to other platforms. Loitering ammunitions is the new obsession of DARPA.
    1
  5. You don’t have a tail rotor and the blades are quite shorter, you could probably fit it in tighter spaces than the hawk, as long as it has enough width. ... or you could do some wood chopping with a 30mm autocannon.
    1
  6. A exoskeleton is great at weight capacity but not at endurance because it can never match our movement precisely and if all you need to do is carry weight, that's what vehicles are for. Ukranians use even ebikes these days.
    1
  7. could be the future of the f16
    1