Comments by "Paul Anthony" (@paulanthony5274) on "Real Stories" channel.

  1. 2600
  2. 21
  3. 16
  4. 12
  5. 8
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 5
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. @velveteyes79 Well,you know Wilma McCann the first confirmed murder victim of Peter Sutcliffe well her son Richard whom you see often in TV programmes about the Yorkshire ripper,well,he forgave Sutcliffe for the same reasons that you say,as he wanted to move on with his life,it seemed to work for him,but there are different levels of love and the love for a little innocent child is much stronger than any kind of love,i know because I have two sons and I love my mum and my dad very much but the love for a child mate is so so much stronger,it really is and some people can't forgive and I'm sure there are ones who probably could,in fact I saw a mother in court in americs tell the killer of her son that she was a Christian and she was taught to forgive,it really is quite powerful viewing and I do understand your point,i just and with respect don't think if you haven't had children yourself are in a position to make that judgement,but I'm not going to be rude to you and whether your "truth" as you put it is true or not some people just aren't strong enough to do what you say,surely you can see that,can you not? It's not about what is the truth et cetera it's about leoples personalities mate. Years ago I was in hospital and I saw a nurse there after my op and shed lost her son in a car crash and I said 'Im so sorry about your sean' and she said "Ah well,thats how it goes" it wasn't that she didn't love him,she was just a strong person,winnie wasnt strong she couldn't get past it. I do understand your points but people are different mate it's her boy,like I said have a good day now no hard feelings but I don't think unless you've had kids yourself then you can fully understand,truths,opinions or whatever..
    4
  15. 4
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. Yes terrible,changed now though and also the police are more inclined to listen to parents explain their child's personality traits. Like,to ask questions like "Has the child gone missing before,is the child an overly friendly or hyper active child,or a quiet one who has never done anything like this before. The police in different Metropolitan's,counties,or, in the case of the u.s states with counties in, are more likely to listen to traits of say a female adult and if she's ever ignored her mobile/Cell/Handy, before (Handy is Deutsch for mobile) The different in the way police are today and we're 20 years + ago is astounding and totally frustrating for many. Police by default after a couple or so years can seem really uncaring and even un human in there way. Imagine being a surviving Yorkshire Ripper victim,trying to tell some ignorant burocratic desk Sargent that your daughter was attacked by a murderer and the irony of them turning him into a nightmare infamous ghoul who only attacks prostitutes,the police,back then ran by a gentleman's club of freemason types. It was pathetic. At least now the officers on the ground are starting to listen to the victims. They have found out fast tactics to worm out the weirdos straight away and study body language to notice who needs their help or who not. Imagine reporting your stepdaughter missing and within having to wait over a day to wait even longer then get highjacked into an interrogation room and accused of murdering her,with no access to a solicitor (lawyer) or anything else whilst you wait for the same "public officials" to mount a search for someone now been dead for 48 hours. We know people are today in jails whom are innocent,how many would that have been even longer ago. The mind boggles,and Brady and Hindleys should have been Hanged! I mean come on,who cares if cp was abolished a year before. Sorry for the odd misquote I'm sure you can read around how I meant it. Plus when I say hanged I mean punished first too. Made to suffer first,im not conservative or a libtard but I believe in what's right is right either way. There's a difference inbetween reasonable doubt and plain obvious,we shouldn't draw a line. No black and white but common sense. Why can't we say "Yes,this case is much clearer than the other ,I believe death row in the states isn't just put there for an appeals process,but also in case the jury got it wrong,the jury isn't infallible. This protects the constitution in the states and we in England,uk even should impose a similar system. Not just,guilty,then hanged 5 months later. But a system of waiting. Call it waiting for godo pmsl,i don't really care but I think the law in more definitive (more definitive,you hear me,sorry,but I think you get what I mean) cases should require capital punishment and forget about injections,just hang them after the probationary period if you like to call it.
    2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1