Comments by "Golden Croc" (@GoldenCroc) on "IWrocker"
channel.
-
271
-
100
-
85
-
61
-
51
-
40
-
39
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
OK I will give some thanks to the community by transcribing the voiceover of the old video at the end. Starting at 8:59
(My note: Swedish military calls some of the their trucks ”cars” as well): ”Terrain cars are nothing new for Scania. In fact, Since 1916, they have built those with 4 wheel drive and 4 wheel steering vehicles, when the first ”Tow wagon” saw the light of day, so 25 years before the American ”Jeep”."
"But times change, and with that the demands on a ”terrain car”. The main requirement from the military was to produce a terrain vehicle with good terrain crossing ability, good drivability, good reliability, cheap maintenance, good road ”agility”.
The military demanded a substantial engine power, 15hp per metric ton, but that wasnt a problem for Scania. The engine is a 6 cylinder boosted Scania Diesel in the 3 axle variant, and a naturally aspirated in the 2 axle configuration. A special demand was that the oil scavenging pump should be able to cope with a vehicle angle of 35 degrees in every direction.
The cars are equipped with a fully automatic gearbox, which means the driver can focus fully on the driving.”
Upvote if you want others to see this comment. I used to drive one of those older variants showed in the last part as well (they were around for a loooong time, probably 30 years), so if you want to ask anything a driver would know, I can hopefully answer it. Cheers mates.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justincase9471 That make sense, as when I when I was supposed to drive on the GP track a few years ago they made us wait about 30 minutes or so... perhaps it was a bit longer for a bunch of bikes to finish going round, with no explanation evident. This is probably what happened.
Oh, thats a very nice ride you got!
Myself I have a 2012 BMW E92 335d. This car is an everyday car with all amenities you could get for that year, standard interior and stuff like tow hitch, etc. It is very heavy, but thats not much do about since its still supposed to be quiet for very long trips and towing boats etc.
I have made a few mods for abit better driving though that dont take away the usability, such as a remap, M3 control arms and more camber angles, sport brake pads and fluid, Bilstein coilovers and AR1 tires on separate rims which I bring with me in the back seat which I put on when going round.
Car can be seen on a short on my channel. Unfortunately I live 1500 km away, so I cant do it more often than once a year. Cheers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AltCutTV I have seen that speculation many times before, and by different people. Also, it being beacuse of the numbers of weeks in a year. Considering that, it seems a lot like finding things that correspond to the number "52" and trying to reaason backwards from it. I dont buy it, at least for Swedish circumstances.
My explanation of whats most likely "at least for Swedes", is, as far as I know, the only one that can be verified by records as being true, and being reasonably general. It was indeed taught in various schools across Sweden for a period of time. So at least if you ask a Swede and they give this answer, there really wouldnt be any need to remember the specifics of what makes a state or nor, just the number taught to them: 52.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kimberleydownunder If they had a lot of time doing nothing for some reason, Its possible. But if they didnt, you payed for it in some other way, since labor costs as soon as you could be doing something else that generates revenue. And thats almost always the case, ergo almost nothing is ever "free", most gas stations that had service certainly werent, since you payed with higher pump prices.
Oh, and people have "ripped eachother off" with simlar stuff like this since before there were people, more or less... I would say its actually a sign of a healthy economic system. Buy the product/service if you want, or negotiate the price down, or dont buy it at all and do it yourself, if you care. Seems fair to me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yannicklucas1836 This post at least shows a bit more effort than most, and for that I applaud you.
However, it falls down a bit considering a few factors:
1 and 2nd pagagraph: It can happen, laws arent always followed by law enforcement and relevant authorities. I am sure you dont disagree with this if you think about it, Havent you ever heard of a case of law malpractice from your home country? Never? Well in that case, I would be worried, because that would more than likely mean you are living in a heavily authoritarian state... Its just human to make mistakes. Most nations have several millions of people, so mistakes happen all the time.
Last paragraph: Yes I agree it can be a reasonable assumption. Its also quite possible thats not the case at all though. It can be more than likely be because the people that bother to reply dont read properly for whatever reason, such as them not wanting what I write to be true.
Yes, it could be seen as a bit condescending, but it is nevertheless 100% true. Note that no one (mostly) really have asked me more about why that is or how, just broadly shouted "No, you are wrong".
If I walk into the local football club fan area in the stands and tell them their club is bad at scoring goals compared to another club, do you think I would get many to agree with me, even though I could shove a paper with statistics under their nose showing my point to be true? Of course not, its just human nature to be biased. No suprise the statistics of people being so about their own country is reasonably high on a channel that often compares different countries to the US.
Considering the replies I have (mostly) got, the second assumption seems more likely. If you are at least as sowewhat reaonable as this post make you out to be, I am sure you will agree if you think about it with a cool head.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AndrewFishman And they dont get charged for that in the US either. In general. Or even in the extreme. This was an illegal arrest.
Now do you see the problem with assuming otherwise? So yes, I am quite aware of the world, and how society in general works in most of the world, and especially in "western" nations (of which australia is a part, former brit colony, commonwealth and all that etc)
I summation, making assumptions from this meagre statistics about hundreds of millions to one is just not possible.
By the way, I am pretty well travelled, and not, nor have ever been, a US citizen. 100% unbiased in this matter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AndrewFishman No, not at all really. Just trying to explain it how it is, which I did already good enough in my first 2-3 posts.
If people dont want to listen, thats not really my problem, but you might note from the posts above no one have really adressed my points in any way. A bit strange dont you think, if you are to make yourself out to be "correct", completely ignoring the text the other side (myself, in this case) lays on the table?
As for your post specifically, you arent saying anything in it thats at all relevant to the discusion here, I am sure you will agree. But if thats what you truly (or more likely, want to) believe , I wont stop you. But if you read my posts with a cool, unbiased head, you will see what I am talking about. It really isnt that hard.
1
-
@Bunny_Aoife Considering the replies I mostly have got, I am not sure at all they do understand outliers.... How can you even take a single instace of a case that has happened a documented of 1 time in recent history as an example when the population of the US is 300+ million? statistically, just about everything can happen, and will, multiple times a day. No matter how unlikely it may seem.
I am telling you they could happen, not because the laws arent different, because I agree they often are. But But because If you take the "child endagerment" story for example, the arrest was against the law!
But considering the rest of your postm, you seem like a pretty reasonable person, surely you can understand my point that I made from the start about laws and culture being less than interesting when it comes to single cases like this. Law malpractice happens everywhere, all the time, wouldnt you agree? Surely you must have heard of tons of them from you own country as well?
As I also said above: "bank robberies are impossible in my country, since they are against the law"
With statistics like my first paragraph above, its not about if, its about when....
I ahve also written about more media exposure etc in my first posts above and how it skews perception.
As for the last part of your post: I know enough about most countries, more than most people, but thats not really the crux hee, not at all. I also I believe other people just fine.
But the simple fact is I just know they havent thought about the statistics and human nature enough before they replied the way the did, or they wouldnt have done so. If you will do the courtesy of doing the same, and truly try to understand what I have written, I am sure you will agree with me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@monksuu Well "answering a question" is all fine and dandy. However, there really isnt much of a relevant question to be answered in this case, since as I wrote, writing the number of valves, especially in a "V4" format is irrelevant from the video makers side, and very strange.
I can give a similar example, "Why do dogs have 6 legs instead of 3?" The answer isnt, "because it makes them run faster", the real answer is: "they dont have 6 legs, this is a misunderstanding, so the question is misstated to begin with"
The only possible reasonable conclusion is as I write above: The maker of the video either mistyped or dont know much about engine configurations in typical cars. No mainstream car in production or in recent years has a V4 engine.
Which leaves the other alternative, but the chances of the video maker defining number of valves for just a 3 cylinder engine, but none of the other configurations mentioned has to border on zero if they have enough engine knowledge. It seems far more likely that he indeed misspelled or mistopk inline 4 for V4 cylinder counts, in which case IWrockers "corrected" to I4 is indeed correct.
I cant help to think their is a language barrier at play here, with those that are well versed in english vs those that are pretty good, but perhaps not quite good enough to decipher technical details and how they are commonly written completely.
Cheers and good night!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1