Comments by "Grim Affiliations" (@grimaffiliations3671) on "SCOTUS Bounces Jack Smiths Immunity Filing" video.

  1. The appeals court was jumped plenty of times in recent history, and he was righfully appointed
    1
  2.  @icestationzebraassociates2460  ?
    1
  3. that would allow the president to do almost anything, essentially creating two tiers of justice
    1
  4. This is false. They tried that same argument against Mueller and it was rejected. There's nothing unconstitutional about his appointment
    1
  5. clearly not, since they did so many times under trump. For issues far less important than presidential immunity
    1
  6. false, he is a special council
    1
  7. calling up secretaries of state and pressuring them to find votes or refuse to certify is not an official act
    1
  8. ​ @themeangene  that would be the opposite of integrity, since there's nothing in the constitution that gives the president absolute immunity
    1
  9.  @TheSulross  nothing unconstitutional about jack smith's appointment. Challenging that would reek of desperation
    1
  10. going to the supreme court is pretty normal
    1
  11. he is
    1
  12. he is sadly
    1
  13. false
    1
  14. then why not have the supreme court put the kabosh on it right away?
    1
  15.  @TheSulross  That's complete nonsense, they've been more trigger happy about jumping over appeals courts than any supreme court in recent history
    1
  16. all that golf wasn't gonna play iyslef
    1
  17.  @Fraser-369  sadly theres nothing unconstitutional about Jack smith's appointment
    1
  18.  @lazertroll702  His appointment is valid, they tried this same argument against Mueller in the Russia case, it failed.
    1
  19. they found a bunch of nuclear secrets so that aint nothin
    1
  20.  @Foxentails  Should we let the people decide whether obama can run again?
    1
  21. only reason to want a delay is because he thinks they'll rule against him
    1
  22.  @justinmiller5660  they tried this same argument against mueller and it failed
    1
  23. they clearly are in the habit of doing it since they;ve done it many times in trump's term
    1
  24.  @bullmoose5574  they clearly can make decisions about the viablity of a candidate. Heck Niel gorsuch himself threw someone off the ballot
    1
  25. They're never going to rule that a president has total immunity, and i think the supreme court's plan is to refuse to intervene thus allowing the appeal courts decision to stand
    1