Comments by "Grim Affiliations" (@grimaffiliations3671) on "Trump is Kicking Bidens Butt Everywhere" video.

isn't the stock market literally at all time highs?
6
 @treelineresearch3387 That isn't true at all
6
we'll get the results on election this time because most states are starting the mail ballot count way before election day
5
are you saying they're as wrong now as they were in 2020? Trump massively outperformed in that election despite the loss
4
Polls swing quickly, they're pretty much meaningless this far out. Especially when Trump tanks in support if convicted of the cases aginst him
3
is she really more of a war monger than trump?
2
@tomhollingsworth8201 you meen the ukraine aid? didn't trump also say he'd ass that if putin didn't liesten to him?
2
@scottshoemake3941 Not for lack of trying. he bombed other countries, massively scaled up the drone war killing tens of thousands of civilians, supported reigeme change, pardoned war criminals and assassinated forign generals
2
@johncameron2241 a huge chunk of republicans don't agree with you
2
yeah, some of these polls trump winning women but losing men, or say that young people are apposed to abortion by double the amount of the next closest age group. Not to be taken seriously, espeically when they don't line up with actual elections
1
@Charmayne7 I don't think Biden will fall for it
1
@Penguinzero1 did trump not do those things?
1
nah, biden will stay on because of incumbent advantage + hes doing better against trump than any other dem
1
@jasonmorgan27 if you're worried about inflation you're going to hate trump's 10% tarrif plan
1
@craigholland2274 it's a tax on consumers. If he really wanted to reshore manufacturing, why did he reduce taxes on profits generated abroad to 0?
1
@akidwithaclub i agree, far better metrics are unemployment, growth and inflation. All of which are doing exceptionally well. Unemployment near all time lows, we're by far the fastest growing in the world, and inflation has been below the fed target over the past 6 months. But of course this is the part where people cope by saying all the numbers are fake
1
@joelellis7035 Yes, you're right, we're the fastest growing in the g7, that's still expectional. Prime age participation is at multi decade highes. they don't stop counting you after 6 months as long as you're still looking for a job. The year over year core inflation numbers are lagging, core inflation over the past 6 months is at the fed target
1
@joelellis7035 It is, but like i said, growing at the fastest rate among the g7 is exceptional. Your claim that you are no longer counted after 6 months is still nonsense. On target means 2%. That isn't avoiding the numbers. Like i said, you're clingin onto laggin numbers from a year ago, we're at 2% over the past 6 months
1
@joelellis7035 The unemployment rate is not detemrined by the number of people receiving unemployment benefits. And why do you keep ignoring the core inflation rate over the past 6 months? is that not 2%? If you don't think an annualized growth rate of 8% over the past 2 quarters is exceptional growth, i don't know what to tell you
1
@joelellis7035 Again, the unemployment data is not conditioned on the number of people receiving unememployment benefits. This BLS conducts a monthly survey that involves 60,000 households. These households are selected using random sampling methods designed to generate as close an approximation as possible to the larger population. And like i mentioned earlier, prime age labor participation is far more useful for assessing the labor market than simple participation, because the elderly move out of work for all sorts of reasons, and prime age participation is at multi-decade highs. Also like i said, core inflation over the past 6 months has been at 2%, i don't know what you don't understand about this. Do you acknowedge this as a fact? You annualize growth on a quarterly basis, and the 3% unnualized growth last quarter and the 4.9% annualized growth the quarter before that absolutely qualify as exceptional growth
1
@joelellis7035 Like i said, the unemployment numbers are not based on unemployment benefits, they're determined when the BLS conducts a monthly survey called the that involves 60,000 households. These households are selected using random sampling methods designed to generate as close an approximation as possible to the larger population. And also like i said, prime age labor force participation is much better at gauging the health of the labor market because the elderly leave the work force for all sorts of reasons, especially after covid. Prime age participation is at multi decade highs. Are you denying that core inflation over the past 6 months is 2%? You annualize growth quarterly, and the annualized growth rate for the past 2 quarters was 4.9% and 3% respectively. That is phenominal growth
1
@joelellis7035 Like i said, the unemployment numbers are not based on unemployment benefits, they're determined when the BLS conducts a monthly survey called the that involves 60,000 households. These households are selected using random sampling methods designed to generate as close an approximation as possible to the larger population. And also like i said, prime age labor force participation is much better at gauging the health of the labor market because the elderly leave the work force for all sorts of reasons, especially after covid. Prime age participation is at multi decade highs. Are you denying that core inflation over the past 6 months is 2%? You annualize growth quarterly, and the annualized growth rate for the past 2 quarters was 4.9% and 3% respectively. That is phenominal growth
1
Like i said, the unemployment numbers are not based on unemployment benefits, they're determined when the BLS conducts a monthly survey that involves 60,000 households. These households are selected using random sampling methods designed to generate as close an approximation as possible to the larger population. And also like i said, prime age labor force participation is much better at gauging the health of the labor market because the elderly leave the work force for all sorts of reasons, especially after covid. Prime age participation is at multi decade highs. Are you denying that core inflation over the past 6 months is 2%? You annualize growth quarterly, and the annualized growth rate for the past 2 quarters was 4.9% and 3% respectively. That is phenominal growth
1
@harleydeclue2456 not a fan of more taxes
1
@yvonnehudson7100 im just sayin, if we're going to to trust the polls, we should also trust the polls that show people are way less likely to vote for him if he becomes a convicted felon
1
@Garvak especially since many moderates were uweilling to vote for people like him even before the convictions. Republicans won the popular vote in 22 and still did terribly.
1