Comments by "Grim Affiliations" (@grimaffiliations3671) on "CBS Evening News" channel.

  1. Why is everyone so hung up on the ID’s? That isn’t the problem. The problem is getting rid of polling places and voting hours
    3
  2. You need ids to vote everywhere.....Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  3.  @blksbth1  Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  4.  @blksbth1  It makes it needlessly difficult for citizens to cast their ballots. That’s what voter suppression is. How does closing poling places and reducing voting hours improve security? How does getting rid of Sunday voting improve security? And the Texas GOP even came out and said there was no fraud in the 2020 election so what is the bill even for? And Texas already has the strictest voting laws in the country
    1
  5.  @blksbth1  For you to say the stage is set for tremendous fraud you need evidence that the system is not secure, you’d need precedent. Something that happened to indicated the system is susceptible to fraud. As I’ve said, Texas already has some of the strictest voting laws in the country, so for the rules to get stricter you would need something to have happened. Anything. In other words you would need the “cocaine” in your analogy to actually exist in some form. But it doesn’t. A better analogy would be someone hammering wooden planks into their safe. It’s needless unless the safe is flawed In which regards do blue states have stricter laws? Voter suppression is not only more prevalent than voter fraud, but also has a much longer history. But these laws have gone on steroids since the Supreme Court gutted the voting rights act. Voter suppression is very easily spotted, unlike fraud which is virtually non existent. Closing polling places and reducing voting hours for example, is voter suppression And tell me how reducing voting hours and location or getting rid of Sunday voting or reducing the time you can apply for an absentee ballots in any way harms the security or integrity of an election. Hilary said Russians interfered with the 2016 election wich turned out to be true. As a result they created a whole new branch of the US government designed to make sure it didn’t happen again, and it also made sure almost every virtual vote in the 2020 election had a paper ballot to go with it. So there was a claim, there was proof, and something was done about it. Great. Trump on the other hand called foul with 0 evidence. Nada. In fact his own lawyers wouldn’t even allege fraud in court. that alone shouldn’t be enough to pass laws that could suppress the vote, especially when those laws have nothing to do with security. It’s incredibly dangerous to craft policy based on unsubstantiated claims. No actually that’s exactly what I’m arguing, these provisions are being passed simply to make it less convenient to vote. They’ll cause longer lines and a much more difficult time voting. Simply because they know republicans don’t win when turn out is high. Pretty despicable in all honesty.
    1
  6. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  7. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  8. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  9. They did it a few times in Oregon
    1
  10. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  11. -someone who doesn’t know anything about the constitution
    1
  12. The last election was pretty close. Texas will turn blue soon enough
    1
  13. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s getting rid of voting hours and polling places
    1
  14. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s getting rid of voting hours and polling places
    1
  15. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  16. Why? It’s a good point
    1
  17. What’s wrong with that example? It’s actually pretty important
    1
  18. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s getting rid of voting hours and polling places
    1
  19. Ids aren’t the problem here. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places. Have you even read the bill?
    1
  20. Weren’t those democrats conservatives?
    1
  21.  @lonewolfrcs1331  Texas trooped have no jurisdiction in Washington
    1
  22. Ids aren’t the problem with this bill. It’s reducing voting hours and polling places and scrapping drive in voting
    1
  23. No it’s called breaking quorum. Well established tool
    1