Comments by "AMAR REDER" (@amarreder6241) on "Brit Hume: Nothing like this has ever happened before" video.

  1. REUTERS Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and ‘Clinton's sock drawer’ defense By Alison Frankel June 9, 2023 4:51 PM EDT Updated 5 days ago Judicial Watch sued over that designation, arguing that the tapes captured classified information including Clinton conversations with foreign leaders. But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them. “The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
    1
  2. REUTERS Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and ‘Clinton's sock drawer’ defense By Alison Frankel June 9, 2023 4:51 PM EDT Updated 5 days ago Judicial Watch sued over that designation, arguing that the tapes captured classified information including Clinton conversations with foreign leaders. But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them. “The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
    1
  3. REUTERS Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and ‘Clinton's sock drawer’ defense By Alison Frankel June 9, 2023 4:51 PM EDT Updated 5 days ago Judicial Watch sued over that designation, arguing that the tapes captured classified information including Clinton conversations with foreign leaders. But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them. “The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
    1
  4. REUTERS Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and ‘Clinton's sock drawer’ defense By Alison Frankel June 9, 2023 4:51 PM EDT Updated 5 days ago Judicial Watch sued over that designation, arguing that the tapes captured classified information including Clinton conversations with foreign leaders. But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them. “The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
    1
  5. REUTERS Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and ‘Clinton's sock drawer’ defense By Alison Frankel June 9, 2023 4:51 PM EDT Updated 5 days ago Judicial Watch sued over that designation, arguing that the tapes captured classified information including Clinton conversations with foreign leaders. But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them. “The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
    1
  6. REUTERS Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and ‘Clinton's sock drawer’ defense By Alison Frankel June 9, 2023 4:51 PM EDT Updated 5 days ago Judicial Watch sued over that designation, arguing that the tapes captured classified information including Clinton conversations with foreign leaders. But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them. “The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
    1
  7. REUTERS Donald Trump, the Presidential Records Act and ‘Clinton's sock drawer’ defense By Alison Frankel June 9, 2023 4:51 PM EDT Updated 5 days ago Judicial Watch sued over that designation, arguing that the tapes captured classified information including Clinton conversations with foreign leaders. But in a 2012 opinion, the trial judge overseeing Judicial Watch’s lawsuit ruled that even if the tapes should have been designated to be presidential records, she could not order the National Archives to recategorize them. “The [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in that 2012 ruling. “Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the president.”
    1