Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Astrum" channel.

  1. Doesnt matter what you believe or not. We have evidence that supports it, beyond doubt. So you should work on your point of view.
    6
  2. It is not about believeing. It is about accapting evidence.
    4
  3. Well we did. And so far none of you can debunk it. While we can prove it
    3
  4. Ah so why arnt magnets Stick to us
    2
  5. Ah and all the other space agencies as well?
    2
  6. Well science is a way of discover things by doing expiriments, collext data, calculations and backcheck it.
    2
  7. you know that you use satalites every day right? You know that Nasa is not the only space agency right? You know that if you discover something you have to proof that? you know that the chines Lunar orbiter photographed the landing site of the Apollo missions right?
    2
  8. Ahm we actually life in warm period in between a ive age. But still it is warmer then in the last millions of years
    2
  9. We basicly cancelled the next ice agr
    1
  10. And why would we believe the bible
    1
  11. No it wasnt. You guys csnt even explain where all the water csme from. And where it go to
    1
  12. The rise of global temperatures, have nothing to do with heat capacity. You didnt understand anything. And indeed greeen house fassen have massive influenced
    1
  13.  @savagegfry  always remember kid. If you deny an Well established field of science, and try to prove your point with physics, you propably are completly wrong
    1
  14.  @savagegfry  In actuallity the greenhouse effect results out of UV light of large gas molecules, and their emmission if infra red light. Something we usually feel as heat. The CO2 doesnt just heat up, like you apperently think
    1
  15.  @savagegfry  btw. There is arise in global temperature, its mesured all over the world, and can be seen by the disapearence of perma frost and ice
    1
  16. Yes it has going on for ever but Rally So fast as right now, and that is the problem
    1
  17. Just claiming CO2 doesnt have any effect is not gonna cut it mate. We know the effects of CO2 and can observe/calculate them
    1
  18. Oh wow. So making up some stuff like interstellar influences, and claim you are the only genius to be aware of it, is new Level of narcisism. Again kid. We can prove the eff2cts of green house Gases in a Lab. I did myself in university chemestry class ;). You just dont want to accept that, so you blindlings deny it out of ignorance and to elegante yourself
    1
  19. That is the purpose of science mate. We dont know something and we reasearch to find out. 100 years ago we didnt knew how to make atom cores to break appart. Now we have nuclear powerplants
    1
  20. You are a religios radical who chooses fairytales over evidence
    1
  21. Experts? You mean the wcientists who study and reasearch this their entire life? They know more about that, than you do mate
    1
  22.  @Phil-s4u  scientists are not paid to say certain things either. You dont know anything about science apperently. Scientists present their data, how they got it and what a likly conclusion is.
    1
  23.  @Phil-s4u  yes there are many factors affecting the atmosphere. Bit the only one thst chsnged significantly in the last 200 years is the emmission of green house Gases. The milankowitch cycle causes minor changes within hundreds of thousands of years. We talk about 2 degree increase in 200 years.
    1
  24.  @Phil-s4u  conclusion, you dont know what you talking about, you call Well educated experts, paid, cause you are biased. And you refuse to accept simple facts, cause that would mean we have to change our life.
    1
  25.  @Phil-s4u  oh hold on. So now you recognise the effect of green house emissions but you basicly say, its actually a good thing? Stunning,
    1
  26.  @Phil-s4u  Because while scientists have to get there work checked for mistakes in method or endure criticism by Colleges, you basicly think yourself more cspable than you are. For example, just saying "life" was better doing while there where no ice caps where present. You completly forget that flora and fauna at that time, where long adapted to the climate conditions this period had. Species need millions of years to adapt to new circumstances and if they cant, they go extinct. Like we saw with the mega fauna at the end of the ice age. Now imagine our current ecoysteme, stressen by human influence anyway, facing a drastig change within centuries. It doesnt take much to understand that this is problematic. Oh btw. 60 percent of humantiy life near the Coast, what could happen if sea levels rise by dozens of meters within a short time period. Gues
    1
  27.  @Phil-s4u  very good. We get closer. And now we can look into the data, and see that it came excactly like scientists predicted since the 70s. So everything turned out to be true. Even worse cause of Domino effects. We even can calculate the amount of heating per mass of CO2. And everything ads up. Time to accept it and work towards it
    1
  28. Yes there were. Also you can see the thing in telescope. Stop following conspiracy sheeps
    1
  29. Funny how, people these days still believe in god
    1
  30.  @vi683a  no scientists know that their theories can debunked by other scientists. That is the spirit of science. We stumble upwards
    1
  31. It absolutly has an effect.
    1
  32.  @ollirantala  mate, chemestry undergrads can mesure the greenhouse effect in Labs all over the world, and they do. Its simple physics. Just because you dont "want" ti accept that doesnt change a thing.
    1
  33. By mesuring the expansion speed, distances, and radioaktive decay
    1
  34. The suns core hase some 20 million degrees in its core. Earth core is up to 6000 degrees hot. Nice try. Back to school
    1
  35. Planets dont Performance fusion like suns do. So Jupiter doesnt have fuel.
    1
  36.  @eric.eternal  before I desroy your weird hickup, you should realize something. I met many of your kind. People that think they understood science, and accept the basics of it. But through arogance they think they understand more about it, as actuall scientists do. Sweet irony.
    1
  37.  @eric.eternal  Yes boy, Hiccup. greedings from a country where we learn three languages in school. You propably never learned a second one. So insead of stumble over autocorrection of a non native english man, you can stick to your talking point. But I gues the fact, that you correct minor mistakes instead of the very foundation of your weird view point, is proving that I was right. You dont have any clue. And Now I know. Good luck with hiccuping the next time about things you dont understand. Cheers
    1
  38.  @eric.eternal  So nothing indeed. Good luck in science class....
    1
  39.  @eric.eternal  yes I do. Because it is my third language. I can accept small mistakes in writing and order as long the subject, can explain its case. But you cant. You are unable to debunk any of my talking points, and instead focus on minor mistakes which are caused by the fact that I didnt grew up with this language. In the end yes. You are an uneducated fool, that cant even explain basic physic laws, but complain about minor mistakes in speech.
    1
  40.  @eric.eternal  your atempts of changing the topic are pathetic. Wanna talk about gas giants, or is that all you can. Baseless claims and misunderstanding of physics and complains about minor language mistakes of a nok native speaker. 😉. Only answer if it is about gas giants.
    1
  41. You dont know what a scientific theory is, do you. Google it please. We have Tons pf evidence for it. And animals dont just get too big. They evolve to fitt into the enviroment..
    1
  42. ​ @ryuk5673 molten earth? My dude that was billions of years before the dinasaurs. And no there is no evidence for such a water body. Cause you would have to explain where it all went
    1
  43.  @ryuk5673  yes. And the dinasaurs lived on the remaining 25 percent.
    1
  44.  @ryuk5673  yes. And when all water on earth would melt, you have like on or two percent more covered in water. Doesnt explain the dinasaur extinction at all
    1
  45.  @ryuk5673  the reason why we can find such things is cause mounten Formation pushed former sea grounds up. But at that time there where other areas above the water
    1
  46.  @ryuk5673  nope mate ancient humans did not play any roll. We have no evidence what so ever for any human presence in this time. The Oldesloe humans we found are 3 million years old
    1
  47.  @ryuk5673  ah this is the reason now. You fell for misinformation. Then what is your evidence for such non existing dinasaurs at the dawn of humanity.
    1
  48.  @ryuk5673  you claimed to have seen evidence of dinasaurs beeing around with humans. So what is the evidence
    1
  49.  @ryuk5673  ah one of those. So therfore giants, fire throwing dragons, centaurs and goblins must exist as well, right. How is it that we only find dinasaur fossils in layers 65 million years old and older. If you would be true, we would find younger ones all around the world. And what should have caused their exctinction so recently. Humans invented thousands of mythical creaturs all around the world. And your Storys are proof of that
    1
  50.  @ryuk5673  So how is it that we dont find fossils in younger layers. No answer?
    1
  51.  @ryuk5673  just saying something untrue doesnt make it true buddy. Just accept thst you where lured in by vonspiracy channels. Nothing bad about thst
    1
  52.  @ryuk5673  nope it just isnt a a debate among scientists. It is a debate among wannabes who dont understand how science works and whos Single goal is to swim against what they call mainstream. Show a single dinasaur fossil which is evidently younger then 65 million years and you would have something. But you dont. You just like the idea of beeing smarter thsn the majority of people
    1
  53. propably someone who doesnt understand actio and reactio. if yoou throw something out behind you, it pushes you foreward.
    1
  54. Kid. Buy a telescope and observe the outer planets yourself. That is what we did in high school
    1
  55.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  - spinning by a pendelum or gyroscope. Also the circular movment of Stars near the poles - globe by the bottom up disapearence of ships behind the horizon. - space by the pressure gradient in the atmosphere. - existance of outter planets by just buying a telescope and looking at them. Also the inability to see certsin Star formstions from different poles of the earth. The problem with you guys is that you dont seek the truth. You seek acceptance and confirmation. When faced with evidence, you get angry, begin to slur at people and pretent you dont understand anything. So why ask for evidence if you dont accept it.
    1
  56.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  See. Whenever you are faced with evidence, you stop arguing. Cause you cant deny those facts. So you choose ignorance.
    1
  57.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  do you ever read comments mate. Or are you just gonna pretent my answer doesnt exist
    1
  58.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  the composition of Stars and many planets is mesured by the light frequency specific to certen elements.
    1
  59.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  there is nothing pushing the water away from us. Only gravity pulling it down. A fly has wings. Water doesnt have wings.
    1
  60.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  nobody ever said the moon is within earths atmosphere ever. But there is a concentration of particels around earth a bit higher than usual in deeps space. If you call this a atmosphere yeah the moon is in this cload
    1
  61.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  and the movement of earth agsin can be easaly proven by a pendelum. Anything else
    1
  62.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  nope Man, I wont. Not untill you furfilled your turn. After me answering around a dozen questions of you. You answer mine 5. I wait
    1
  63.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  and btw. mate. So far, I answered every question you had. So its time for you to cool down this unreasonable arrogant confidence of ignorant mounten you show
    1
  64.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  accourding to you it should be easy. With your confidence you should be able to destroy us sheeps right 😘
    1
  65.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  and what do you say so far for the proof I gave you. Stunning ha
    1
  66.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  i literly gave you evidence. For example. Look for a Video of a pendelum Experiment. Links get deleted here
    1
  67.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  I give you some Personal experience. As a Teenager I was currios of all these planets look realy like Nasa shows us. So what did I do. I bought a telescope. When I Set it up and looked for the planets I actually saw them. Especially saturn and its rings look beautifull. So far everything they claimed was right. Why wont you do that for a start. Good ones dont even cost 1000 dollars.
    1
  68.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  Well I have observed them, .any times. And their are countless of amsteur astronomers doing the excact same thing. Look up outer planets telescope footage and see some. Stunning. So fsr they didnt lie about what they look like. So what else could they not lie about?
    1
  69.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  chek out the video of J.W. astronomy. He is a good one.
    1
  70.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  slow down mate. And lets Focus on one topic. Why can I see the planets, excactly as NASA and other space agencys Show them. Why can I clearly see the moon asasphere with shadows and crators. Excactly like NASA saws. And why can I see sun eruptions with a sun Filter.
    1
  71.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  if I now wouöd Show you a study that uses spektroskopy to mesure the elements Saturn is made of. Would you accept it or not
    1
  72.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  slow down means stop jumping from topic to topic. We finish one after another. I see the stuff they claim to be out there. So they dont lie. And I know what they are made of through scientific studies. Studies you propably deny
    1
  73.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  but one question what LED you to believe they lieing about anything
    1
  74.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  again mate. What let you nelieve they lie
    1
  75.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  I already answered you multiple times what the evidence for the movment of earth is. The pendelum Experiment and gyroscopes. And like always you dont even answer to them
    1
  76.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  but for sacke of this Diskussion and out of my curiosity. What let you to believe that "they" are lieing to us. It should be easy given how confident you are.
    1
  77.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  again. What led you to believe that all the scientists lie. They prove everything they say. And you csn look it up. LAST time what LED you to believe in the great lie. Something had to start it.
    1
  78.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  just say it mate. Why are you so reluctant. What makes you think they lie to us. It is a simple question 😅
    1
  79.  @TheRealNewWhirledOrder  I already gave you. Again what made you believe they lie to us.
    1
  80. Nope photons dont have mass. And they are indeed affected by gravity
    1
  81. Ah did you fall for that foolish suspicios observer channel
    1
  82.  @wilcandou  well first. It is expensive af. And second. Would you like to have radioactive cells in your notebook
    1