Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. Putin. In 2022 and in the tucker interview
    5
  2. Wow you dont know anything right. How many ukrainians died in donbass. And who killed them.
    3
  3. Well excactly for that reason. Cause russia is threatening ukraine
    3
  4. Back then it was true. They had massive shortages. They just recruted half their prison population and foraign merceneries
    3
  5. So who is holding the 1000 km frontline of they dont have soildiers. What is smashing into russian positions if they dont have shells
    2
  6. Nope IT isnt. First the wage raises have been eaten Up by Inflation. Second they wages Had to BE Risen cause otherwise you dont get staff. But the buissnesses actually cannot afford IT for Long. Russia has a incredible interrest rate that will make IT Impossible to build or invest
    2
  7. Nobody said bakhmit was a failiure. It was just very costly. But russia didnt managed to do anything in kharkiv
    2
  8. Well russia wanted all of ukraine. And they failed. Just like in Finland.
    2
  9. And spesking a language of course makes you wanting to be russian right
    2
  10. Actually ITS Not.
    2
  11. Russia is highly dependend on technology and machine imports.
    2
  12. ​ @AronAroniteOnlineTV nope maidan was not done by the west. It was done by millions of ukrainians which where pissed about their government lieing
    2
  13. 😂😂😂. So the biowapons thing is still around here ha?
    2
  14. @mettemafiamutter5384 well mate. Do you have any evidence for that, besides russia told you so. Ist stunning that you learned nothing from the iraq war
    2
  15. Well ukraine did neither lf those things so you argument is flaud in the first place.
    2
  16. Did it now.? Russia didnt make and breakthrough
    2
  17. Nobody lushed Nato. Countries askef for ir
    2
  18. So you watch RT
    1
  19. Yeah. Cause then there is Peace. Elections are only allowed in Peace time
    1
  20. Nope nobody reports suxh numbers for ukrainian losses
    1
  21. And how is that propaganda
    1
  22. Ahm nope that is not what they are doing but keep o reading russia today
    1
  23. Or ukraine just joins Nato. Then russia can cry all they want. Bit they cant do anything
    1
  24. Cause irs not the topic of the video
    1
  25. Did you ask ukraine if they think the same way
    1
  26. Oh so russia didnt invade Ukraine
    1
  27. Well IT has Not used Himars in the dam
    1
  28. Copy paste comment sanctioned by the kremlin
    1
  29.  @evgeniya7853  nah kid. Not even amerikan or any Fan of them. Just funny how they play it like ukraine wanted to murder civilians
    1
  30. Yeah cause zelensky didnt knew who he was
    1
  31. Well maybe because biden had valid points
    1
  32. Well but russia invaded all of ukraine
    1
  33.  @susannamarker2582  oh so I gues kiev is eastern ukraine
    1
  34. Russia spends more then half of its national budget on war. And that is the point
    1
  35. Vietnam is 5 times smaller then US in the 70s. They cannot win
    1
  36. There where no plans for joining Nato befor the war
    1
  37. Funny how you never know whag actually happened. And what about the el2cted government months after the revolution
    1
  38. So is tgere a realisticopportunity of Nato attacking russia? Nope. Russia fears it cannot dorce its will on ukraine. That is all
    1
  39. Well russia did some major warcrimes in donezk
    1
  40. Problem ist russia basicly needs to import almost everything in advances mashinerie.
    1
  41. Nope. Amerika spends 3 percent of its GDP for militaty. Thats about half of russia
    1
  42. Russia grows the russophobia itself by attacking ukraine
    1
  43. Well ukraine didnt Brake agreements. Russia did. Their puppets in donbass launched a major offensive days after minsk
    1
  44. The so called "peace plan" includes 4 regions of ukraine beeing annaxed by russia. Even far beyond the current frontline. He demands a surrender
    1
  45. Russia doesnt Always ACT logicly. They hoped to kill many civilians but ended Up Killing more of their own
    1
  46. How so?
    1
  47. Problem is they cannot do it. A partial mobilasation drove slmost a million out of russia. They cant pay their current troops already. Not to mention arm and feed them
    1
  48. IT aged perfectly
    1
  49. Ukraine didnt commit horrendous atrocities against russian speakers. They vote them for president.
    1
  50. Not realy No. Russia right now has a economic turmoil
    1
  51. Russia didnt invade any of the New Nato members. Gues why
    1
  52. ​ @1GTX1 they deployed to few troops, cause they expected ukraine to fall quickly and the government to flee. HTS deployed only a few thousand troops but managed to tske over syria quickly. Russia just underestimated ukraine
    1
  53. Do you even know about those countries
    1
  54.  @evgeniya7853  cool. And and later it was declined by europeen nations. Further more with despited areas since 2014 they could not have joined anyway
    1
  55. Trust me bro
    1
  56. Ukraine never was a security threat to them. And you casauly say well let them just annax territory they want. What is wrong with you.
    1
  57. They dint
    1
  58.  @DavidGitongawriter  nope. It just means accurate descriptions of curren situations can be wrong as soon as the situation changes Doesnt mean it was wrong. Just not a long holding situation
    1
  59.  @DavidGitongawriter  well that is what they do. You hear a lot of could, may and jopefully here. But current Situationskomik actually give you a hint where things go
    1
  60. And do you have any evidence IT was ukraine
    1
  61. Cause this time they get Nato membership
    1
  62. Well most of donbass lived unter ukrainian controll. And did quiet well. Apperently russian speakers didnt need any protection
    1
  63.  @milanrakonjac3812  nope. Accourding to literly people from those donbass areas report how they lived before the war.
    1
  64.  @milanrakonjac3812  the very fact that you vall ukrainians bandera nazis shows what a good russian citizen you are. Dont ask questions just accept a demonisation of russias enemy. We dont need grey zone in your mind
    1
  65.  @milanrakonjac3812  there have been russian bases in my neighberhood my full life my boy. I am german and we lived in Sicht of russisn tanks.
    1
  66. So if we make a contract not allowing unrsine into Nato ukraine gets all its territory back?
    1
  67. Well Ukraine IS Not bombing civilians in russia
    1
  68. Nope the Istanbul negotiations failed cause russia made unrealistic demands
    1
  69. So russian Trolls still dream about greater russia😂
    1
  70. Why should they?
    1
  71.  @kasper7203  be a buffer state
    1
  72.  @kasper7203  well you make all the wrong assumptions. Russia wants all of ukraine. So condeming ukraine to neutrality would mean totall anahilation in 10 years. I dont care what russia thinks. If we would have just accepted ukraine in 2008 none of this would have happened and russia wouöd have to shut up. We nwver broke any agreements. Russia did by breaking budapest and minsk. Beeing in the russian sphete of influence usually condems you to poverty. Compare poland and ukraine. Beein with the west means success. And russia will not start world war 3 cause it knows it cant win it.
    1
  73. Cause they want strategic controll over the Black sea
    1
  74. ​ @metavatnik russia literly desteoyesäd most of donbass cities and all tge remaining pwople in it. Its only about territory.
    1
  75. Peoblem is its about resources and conquest. If nato would be the only thing russia would not annax territory and prohibit the ukrainian language
    1
  76. Cause they failed to take out the ukrainian government. Capture the Black see coast, gain all of donbass and other Oblast and lost their entire active tank force so far in a very costly war
    1
  77. Well he dont want it. Nobody wants it
    1