Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Russia To Rebuild Its Potential And Threaten NATO by 2027?" video.

Russia has lost basicly 30 years of military production. Although they now spend 3/4 of their Budget to military spending that will lead to terible cost for infrastructure, the population and economy
45
@konstantinbush295 ask the russians why they now buy shells from north korea and ask former sovjet states for spare parts for helicopters. And lets not forget they lost more tanks then they produced for themself in almost 30 years.
20
@konstantinbush295 so you compare small Arms fire fight in urban anti insurgency operations with an conventional war. Shows how ignorant you are about the reality of the ukraine war.
10
@konstantinbush295 ok, shells. This 10 to 1 rate was indeed the case. In 2022. However, in 2023 this rate drasticly decreased to a point when in summer 2023 the shell rates where about equal. Russia, my friend had decades of shell production and storage dating back to the sovjet union. This storage now is gone. They need to buy shells from china and north korea. But how effective is this. A single himars rocket can achive more then 100 shells if it Hits a comand post, ammo storage or artillery piece.
4
@konstantinbush295 if they have plenty of wapons, why do they need to ask north korea for ammo mate. Why dont zhey open another front or finally push through ukrainian defensive lines. Cause they cant.
3
@covfefe1787 so on average 30 years old equipment. Cool. Russia now uses 70 years old tanks. So more then twice as old
3
Absolutly we doing good without it
2
Yeah russians live very good in their poverty
1
@jahlahbrine843 Well in the end it matters what flsg is on the Hill and in what state the economy of the fractions is. Gues who lost and gues who is in better or worse economical shape. Countries who buy sovjet equipment, do this usually cause they cannot afford to use anything better.
1
@konstantinbush295 the russians attack for 2 mounths now. Do far they failed
1
Russia at some point must accept a deal. And there is no way ukraine stars out of Nato after this war. So propably russia will keep what its got and the Rest of free ukraine will be another Nato state
1
@karlgruen2895 how much did they achieved after lost two years of War? They run their heads into ukrainian defences suffer huge losses and in the end win a village or strip of land. As long as they dont take ukraine as a whole, they will have to agree to some kind of deal.
1
@karlgruen2895 correction. They fight ukraine and 5% of Nato budget. Basicly they fight what we can spare to not risk our own security. And they even failed in that. Not a good sign for the secon army of the world
1
Easy to answer: - Putin dorsnt see ukraine as a country but as a russian Provence. - The russians where stoped at the gates to kyiv and their airforce never was able to break the ukrainian airdefence. - russia underestimated the ukrainian army and thought of a quick collapse of the ukrainian government. - neither in eastern europe nor in ukraine nuclear wapons would be stationed. Cause its unnaccassary. Nuclear deterance via submarines and ICBMs is more then enough
1