Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. Problem is. Those tanks are rusty, weak and hard to use. Like my old csr they could break down after a few KM
    1
  2. Source Trust me bro
    1
  3.  @uniformmike05  i doubt russia can keep Up with production
    1
  4. Wow 100 missles per day for six mounths. Interresting where you got that number from. That would be 100× 180= 18.000 missles. 2 million dollars per missle meaning 36.000.000.000 billion dollar. Production started 20 years ago. So you wann tell me that they spend almost 5 percent of budget per year for kalibr. Not very convincing. Also if they have such a huge number, why didnt they started the war with much more missles, why do they use missles produced in 22 if they have many older ones. Why strugle to buy iranian missles and drones
    1
  5. Do you realize that russia has ZERO right to be in ukraine? They attacked them to annax terrortiry and enforce their will. Ukraine asked for help defending itself. So we help them
    1
  6. Well He explained
    1
  7.  @hansharz9934  the special Operation is only a destraction aiming to confuse fools like you. It Sounds better that is all. Second the bombing of iraq actually Was highly effective. After one mounth iraq was taken. All in all the invasion caused less then 50 k casaulties. Mostly military. They expected to just take a weak ukraine and annex it. Now this sparing of civilians is a cheap joke.
    1
  8. Kid putin doesnt ask his parliament anything. Cherson is majority ukrainian still they annaxed it. Now bombing it. Putin claimed for decades ukraine to be a part of russia, so yes it was his goal
    1
  9.  @Boris-do5rs  nope its not gone. That is the reason why stealthy cruese missles are passend rusdias airdefence. That is why almost every larger nation is building stealth planes
    1
  10.  @Boris-do5rs  Yes If. But what is your evidence for that. And what excactly is far. 100 km 200 km
    1
  11.  @Boris-do5rs  And once ukraine got modern AA Systems they didnt anymore. Now they use glide bombs, cause they csnt penetrate ukrainian airspace with planes, anymore.
    1
  12.  @Boris-do5rs  but what on earth is this silly Story supposed to mean in the context. We talked about stealth my boy.
    1
  13.  @Boris-do5rs  we talked about how valuable stealth is. And you come up with a none stealth aircraft. What is your point
    1
  14.  @Boris-do5rs  Ah I see. So miss spelled. You wrote SU35. So to this very day there is no confirmed use of SU57. Every single time people claime it, it was debunked. Accourding to russia itself. It has a RCS equivalent to a cruese missle. Around 0.1 sqm. And when russia claims something its much worse usually. BTW. If an awacs on Nato territory cant see somethin at the russo ukrainian border, means nothing. If its far away enough it is not detectable. If a non stealthy cruese missle flies by at 400 km, you cant see it with an awacs. You dont understand what you are talking about.
    1
  15.  @Boris-do5rs  BTW every stealth plane is visible at a certain range. Its just math. RCS and distance. There is no white and Black here. There is RCS and the question how low it is. And if its low enough you can ewcape Radar. Like Amerika did in dozens of conflicts
    1
  16.  @Boris-do5rs  Oh wow. You changed your mind 180 degrees. First you claimed stealth and the F35 is obsolet. Now you claim those super dupa SU57 are invisible. Wow that went bad for you
    1
  17.  @Boris-do5rs  the Su35 sure. We saw them in active combat since 2012. But to this day we never saw a definitive Action of the SU57.
    1
  18.  @Boris-do5rs  And again if apperently in your world the stealth Features of the SU57 work good enough. Therefore the F35 is not obsolete. In fact its the opposite
    1
  19.  @Boris-do5rs  Is that so. Accourding to who?
    1
  20.  @Boris-do5rs  ok again. Where is this 17 to zero comming from
    1
  21.  @Boris-do5rs  BTW. Your rambling about g forces shows that you dont have any idea how AA missles work. They dont follow you around they aim and fly in an almost straight path. All sovjet fighter jets cn perform 7 g plus turns. But it didnt help them in ukraine did id
    1
  22.  @Boris-do5rs  1. Cause to this very moment you refuse to give any evidence for use of SU57 in ukraine 2. You ignore the varios shotdowns of very manuverable russian planes. 3. You Mix stealth with manuvrrbility. What is it now
    1
  23.  @Boris-do5rs  I am not amerikan so I dont watch amerikan news mate. Just present your proof for that 17 to one ratio. Or any proof for SU57 in Action in ukraine
    1
  24.  @Boris-do5rs  those drones have 600 km plus reach. So you dont have any evidence for wctive use of Su57, you also refuse to provide evidence for this 17 to 1 claime. You are thereofore just a confused russian fanboy. Fait enough. Took you long enough
    1
  25.  @Boris-do5rs  you made the claim. Meaning unless you just made it up, you must have red it somewhere. So where was that
    1
  26.  @Boris-do5rs  nope you repeat what he tells you. You can in theory see stealth better with low frequency but.but only at a certsin distance. And it lightd the Radar Station up like a christmas tree, risking getting detected by AR missles.
    1
  27.  @Boris-do5rs  And accourding to you russia has a very great success with SU57. Something you still refuse to provide evidence for. So accourding to you russian stealth is great, while amerikan stealth is obsolet. Wtf
    1
  28.  @Boris-do5rs  they cant in fact not. They can see a bit better with low frequency. But only so much. A b21 100 km away is invisible regardless.
    1
  29.  @Boris-do5rs  no Radar can see over the horizon, that is not how light works. That is why russia and Amerika have early waring Radar planes. You know literly nothing kid
    1
  30.  @Boris-do5rs  lets make a deal. You finally tell me where this 17 to one ratio is comming from and I give you my source ;)
    1
  31. There is one. Name how many tanks does russia have left
    1
  32.  @juliuszkocinski7478  still the russians retreatet from the north, and compared sheer numbers the russians should win tomorrow
    1
  33.  @Cotac_Rastic  you are not realy good informed are you pal. The majority of troops are listed in the east, because this was the Most likly Fron in the Case of war. And now the military is moving the heavy wapons to the east. Only territorial defence is remaining. Also they killed ablot of orcs in kiyv and captured a Lot of material
    1
  34. Still active though
    1
  35.  @AniMageNeBy  you dont know anything, do you. Those FABs are launched from deep in russian territory. Out of reach of ukrainian air defences
    1
  36.  @AniMageNeBy  so yes russia established a strip of a few dozen km of kind of airsuperiority. Within ukraine however, russia has no airsuperiority
    1
  37.  @AniMageNeBy  the ukrainian electrical grad was not destroyed by glide bombs my boy. Neither Was it by jets. It was mostly destroyed by huge waves of iranian drones and low vost cruese missles. No matter how good you are eventually you run out of ammo or some get zhrough
    1
  38. Ah any source for that. And even if. A few dozen of them dont make a huge difference
    1
  39.  @geoffrey9888  alraight. What you seem not to know is what those missles are 😉. The overwelming majority of Irans missles are short range (so less than 100km) ones with poor precision. The Long range and precicion arsenal of iran is estemated to about 800 to 1000. If you Talk about missles you propably Talk about cruise missles. Especialy kalibr. Those aß we now know require Western technology which is blocked now so no more production. USA is quiete clear with their numbers and right now they have about 3000 of the equivalent tomohawk. Russia has a much weaker economy and less money to produce. So asume a bit less that. Russia cannot waste all of it in this war. They need a stockpile of them for future conflict. They running out.
    1
  40. Nope
    1
  41. What a silly liar you are
    1
  42. Kiddo. You didnt even whatched the video
    1
  43. Well, this Story could be just pure bs, but fine lets asume it is true. If you would "find" tanks out in the siberian tiga, they would have been their for years, out in the open, exposed to the elements and Not checked on. Meaning they are in very bad shape, and require massive repairs
    1
  44. Of course not
    1
  45. And what are they gonna do with this hypersonics. Shot them into mals like they did last summer?
    1
  46. Any Figures how much they produce
    1
  47. Well because it complicates logistics and you sacrafice trained crews if you just let them destroy all of the old tanks
    1
  48. Nope the abrams is late 80s early 90s Design. And yes they are modernised sometimes. But dont forget. Many of These tanks were out in the elements for decades, without any Action. They are basicly using junk from a junk yard
    1
  49. Not propaganda but counting of aatalite imigas
    1
  50. So why they dont just bomb kiew with bombers
    1