Comments by "Gregory Milla" (@gregorymilla9213) on "War Academy" channel.

So many German lovers in these comments. Barbarossa failed because of the high losses by September it was obvious they would lose the Germans had taken so many causalities .
6
@classicgalactica5879 the Russian are attributing to inflicting 80% of the German casualties the Allies had a marginal effect on the outcome
3
“ tragically” so many national socialist in the comments
2
@lyndoncmp5751 the Germans were very resourceful Albert Spear was able to keep a surprising amount of German industry production. Nothing is going to replace people and 80% of the casualties inflicted against the Germans were at the hands of the Russians . 2 years of fighting happened before the invasion of Sicily and three years of fighting happened before Normandy
2
@anthonycruciani939 what do you tell your National Socialist pals?
2
The Russians had everything to do with the Germans failure in the War .
1
@troyott2334 the German Army was incurring a 25% casualty rate by the end of September 1941 the war was over at that point . They were not used to people fighting back .
1
@matty6848 they couldn’t take Leningrad nor Stalingrad the Germans had lost the war as early as September 1941 they were taking a 25% casualty rate which was completely unsustainable for them.
1
@MrDaiseymay he’s not the comments are filled with national socialist
1
@troyott2334 where is this mythical red dragon Adolf Jr. ?
1
@troyott2334 the war was over well before the Germans approached Moscow .
1
@troyott2334 Hitler had less of a chance of taking Moscow than Stalingrad
1
@orlandofurioso7958 the war was over for the Germans well before winter by September they were taking a 25% casualty rate which is completely unsustainable for their army .
1
@orlandofurioso7958 blaming the winter for their loss is myth the Germans and their admirers love to tell themselves to make themselves feel better . By September of 1941 the Germans were incurring a 25% casualty rate at the hands of the Russians which was completely unsustainable for their army. The Germans were spoiled by their string of easy victories in Europe. The Russians simply fought back voraciously in a way they never experienced.
1
They were not that great . The Germans were not able to make very many, the tank sunk to the turrets in the mud and the transmissions failed at 200 km of service.
1
@lyndoncmp5751 Two years of preventing the Axis from growing larger ? What are you even talking about ? It was two years of the Axis taking over every country they invaded from Greece to Norway to France and doing it in six weeks at a pop . How did the West perform in Greece or France? They got walked over very quickly . This Azores to Iran notion is ludicrous the German supply lines clearly couldn’t support the Axis in North Africa going to Iran would be impossible. The fact is nobody inflicted any real damage to the German army until Barbarossa . By September of 1941 the Germans were suffering a 25% casualty rate and the hands of the Russians and the war was essentially over .
1
Wrong dude the Russians inflicted a 25% casualty rate against the Germans by September 1941 . Unsustainable for the German army the war was over in September 41
1
@JDDC-tq7qm the Russian army mutinied in WW1 game over . Poor leadership by Russian Officers enabled the communist
1
@landonlacy1954 a win is a win
1
@JDDC-tq7qm horrible leadership of the Russian army enabled Bolshevism
1
@JDDC-tq7qm exactly
1
@alexfromboston8303 Bolshevism allowed Russia to not be affected by the Great Depression saving its industry along with the spirit of collectivization enabling the Russian to move massive factories eastward
1
@JDDC-tq7qm he’s right the Russians had horrible leadership and that one battle destroyed moral
1
@JDDC-tq7qm the soldiers mutinied dude
1
@anthonycruciani939 Stalin won end of story
1
@JDDC-tq7qm of course not all soldiers were mutineers . Not all was roses on the western front either. There was a mutiny of Russian soldiers at the La Courtine camp during the summer of 1917 that remains to this day one of the least known events in the First World War on the western front .
1
@JDDC-tq7qm the tsar took command of the army and was directly blamed for the lack of food , munitions and even lack of uniforms for the soldiers. The soldiers unwillingness to suppress the strikers in Petrograd and then actually joining them is what forced the tsar to abdicate. I am not sure what these wins are you are referring to the Russians rather quickly lost a million men and had a huge refugee crisis
1
@anthonycruciani939 the factories didn’t relocate themselves. I’ll tell the 300 million people who died as a result of Western Europeans colonialism.
1
@anthonycruciani939 don’t be late goose stepping your way to the national socialist rally
1
@alexfromboston8303 it’s plain to see the difference in industrial output between Imperial Russia and Socialist Russia it’s not even close . The fact the factories were able to be torn down moved East then back up and running was nothing short of miraculous. T-34’s were combat ready off the assembly line . The Germans took months to commission their tanks and they still broke down. The reasons for Germany’s defeat are varied .The ability of the Russians to inflict casualties and the inability of Germans to field re-enforcements was also huge.
1
@alexfromboston8303 yes Stalin did transform the Russian economy with his five years plans and the economy was largely buffered from the Great Depression. People love to talk of Stalins brutality when in comes to Western European colonial history that killed 200 million people over the course of 300 years the history books go silent
1
This battle was lost in early October well before winter
1