Comments by "Juzu Juzu" (@juzujuzu4555) on "" video.

@mikestrohm3271 I had your attitude when I started my grad school at physics. Before you analyze the moon rocks yourself, you are just believing that they exist and are from moon. To get moon rocks, you can send lunar lander that collects samples and then takes off. Just by removing humans, the mission suddenly becomes 100x times more plausible because machines can stand radiation on the moon/space, and require 10x less life support etc. equipment. Less weight means exponentially less required fuel. However there is another possibility, which many believe, that they had much better tech even before the faked apollo mission. However, the footage is faked, it's filmed in studio+desert. There is atmosphere, no radiation, and 100% proof of frontscreen projection. All photos/videos have the same geometric patterns, which are most visible on the black space. Jay Weidner's Kubrick's Odyssey explains the frontscreen projection. Also Richard Hoagland has published those findings in clever way, by pretending to belief in glass cities made by aliens on the moon. It's possible that there exist professors that are really that stupid, but almost certainly that his method of exposing the lie.
2
@mikestrohm3271 All apollo footage shows the geometric shapes, as you clearly know if you watched that video. Also the dust forms cloud in multiple parts where moonrover spins it's tires. The speed of that matter slows down, impossible in vacuum. Have a hammer made out of plastic, fill it with enough hydrogen, and you have similarly dropping objects. The adjust the speed of the film. Or film that part in vacuum chamber and combine the footages, or tons of other methods. The fact that they even did stupid experiments like this, but not 360 degree turns or anything that actually would be hard or impossible, is 10 times more proof of fakery than the experiment is proof of vacuum. There are many many ways how math and physics prove the mission to be faked as published, but the similar patterns on photos are mathematical proof. In low probability you can have lines in your photos like that, for multiple reasons, but to have the same geometric patterns in all photos is probabilistic impossibility. It's the footprint of frontscreen projection, but there are lots more evidence of frontscreen projection. Just watch the video or download https://pirateproxy.ch/torrent/6562647/Kubrick_s_Odyssey_-_Secrets_Hidden_in_the_Films_of_Stanley_Kubr
2
@mikestrohm3271 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkXETqJgpBQ There is your dust clearly not moving in parabolic trajectory at constant speed. Watch the whole video I sent and you can see the geometric patterns are 100% proof of frontscreen projection. Don't bother commenting the same thing over and over without even watching the footage I already sent you link multiple times. So watch it if you are interested on the truth. If not, why do you bother?
2
@THOMASTHESAILOR Actually in the 60s there were already scientists that proved that the mission is impossible, many didn't believe the mission even before it "happened". In the 70s many Hollywood films made joke of the moonlanding to be faked in studio -> 007 Diamonds are forever was probably the most famous. Also in the 70s the methods of the faking was already known, and already at 71 someone wrote a small book about Stanley Kubrick being the man who did it in the 4 years he spend with 2001 A Space Odyssey, which also sold us the idea that people would move slower when there is less gravity -> ridiculous in itself, but necessary to sell the fake footage. Probably the modern era began with Jay Weidner's Kubrick's Odyssey, which shows without a doubt that the footage was shot using frontscreen projection, the popular technology of the 60s, perfected and used in 2001 by Stanley Kubrick. Also, The Shining has in almost every scene an aspect of the faked moon footage. Almost every evidence that is said against the mission is "hidden" in the film. For example the method of frontscreen projection and how to spot it from the moon footage.
1
@THOMASTHESAILOR Apollo hoax is everywhere, has been from the start. Reading caboose by MadTV is one place where they tell the truth on things and mask it as comedy. I suggest watching all of them, but for moon hoax you should watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H37vGQYJu2M&t=8s
1
@mikestrohm3271 Actually I explained how the footage can be proven to be fake. Frontscreen projection leaves it's marks, most easily seen in the black space. The geometric shapes that are reflected to the canvas can be seen. Nobody addresses that evidence because there is nothing to say against it. When you study it, it's game over for NASA. Even if I was Russian troll, the evidence is mathematical. It doesn't change based on who is the source.
1
@mikestrohm3271 If you are interested in truth, you should check out how the frontscreen projection of apollo footage can be proven. Or continue thinking that all the people who know it's fake are idiots, no matter how educated they are and how much they have researched the subject.
1
@mikestrohm3271 Well, you clearly have no idea how frontscreen projection works, or how you can prove it by analyzing the images. It leaves geometric patterns, and when those canvases are sowed together, those borders can be seen. When there are geometric patterns from frontscreen projection in the black space of all apollo footage, there is no other possible explanation. It's pure mathematical proof. There are tons of other evidence, but this is the easiest and there is nothing that can be said when you see it and understand it. People from the Hollywood have known it from the start and have embedded this knowledge into films and TV, and shared overall.
1
@mikestrohm3271 Kubrick's Odyssey one, found HQ in pirate bay and in sadly really low quality in youtube shows you how to spot frontscreen projection https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yge_LJ_IuhI Richard Hoagland has found those patterns and is using the cover of thinking those to be alien glass cities on moon to publish his findings, or in small possibility he is just believing alien glass cities. There are big enough hangars/bases where everything could be filmed. And it's really not hard. After all, even in 2001 a Space Odyssey they already used huge canvases.
1
@mikestrohm3271 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yge_LJ_IuhI I don't believe anybody but I know physics and math.
1
@mikestrohm3271 Did you watch the video I sent? All the 5 parts? There is enough info there to make anyone with intelligence to recognize the mathematical proof. It doesn't matter if there were 500 billion people operating on the moon landings, physics is physics and math is math. Those prove the footage is faked. Also there are LOTS of people that have spoken against the apollo mission, but do you really think those will be shown on news? Only small number of people are needed to fake the whole thing. All the rest could be in the dark and think it's real. Though controlling massive amount of people is pretty easy. Militaries, agencies and secret societies do it all the time. Why do you think media is still selling us the shit that JFK was shot by Oswald, when the footage itself shows that the shot came from completely opposite direction? Or why do everyone pretend that 911 was done by Bin Laden and muslism? 911 was MUCH harder operation than faking moon landing footage, and needed more inside knowledge. Also pretty much all the 3 million freemasons knew instantly what that false flag represented. Still, whole world supported war against terrorism.
1
@mikestrohm3271 I also told you that HQ version is available at pirate bay. However, that quality is enough if you watch it completely. It shows exactly the geometric shapes on the black space plus tons of more evidence of frontscreen projection. That is mathematical proof, and you either understand math or you don't. It doesn't matter if billion people say that 5+5=11, it still isn't. That's the beauty of math proof. And that's why I don't bother discussing things like obvious atmosphere and dust hitting atmosphere and forming clouds by moon rover and astronauts foots. Some fool will interpret that as static electricity or think that there must be some explanation to that behavior. But math doesn't have those problems, and even those who doesn't know physics will understand math. Watch all the 5 parts of that video and you will see the geometric shapes, and further evidence and sources.
1
@mikestrohm3271 You can troll all you like, I sent you link to video that shows those patterns and people who investigated them. Matter moves in parabelic trajectory on vacuum, where the parabelic curve is based on the amount of gravity. When matter slows down mid air and forms cloud and change directions, there is no vacuum. Watch the video I sent if you are not afraid of the truth. If you are, it's better to move on and forget this topic altogether.
1
@mikestrohm3271 You either are trolling and hiding the truth, or lack understanding on why those patterns are mathematical proof of projection canvases. Also the link I sent you for the dust clouds clearly shows that the dust is not moving in perfect straight parabelic trajectory in constant speed. It forms cloud, spreads out, slows down it's speed and stays in mid air, while it should drop as fast as stone in vacuum. If you open your mind and accept the fact that the footage is faked, then you will start to find and see tons of clear examples of fakery. It's hard process, but ultimately beneficial.
1
@mikestrohm3271 Anybody can see the dust is not moving in vacuum. If you watched the video, you have all the evidence and sources you need. Those geometrical shapes are mathematical proof, as I already explained. And you can take whatever original apollo footage and use the method in the video and are able to see the patterns by naked eyes. I don't understand why you are deflecting, but I guess you have your reasons. But tell me this, are you actually interested in knowing the truth?
1