Comments by "Juzu Juzu" (@juzujuzu4555) on "Hitler's Socialism | Destroying the Denialist Counter Arguments" video.

  1. Capitalism really is about maximizing the profits through minimizing what you pay for the resources. That leads to global corporate oligarchy, which we already have, but which continues to take control over the political systems until there essentially is just politicians working for the corporations. It's the worst kind of dictatorship where it's impossible to break free through revolution. Because there are so much benefits for the big corporations over a little ones, and especially over the workforce, there need to be mechanisms that make it harder and harder to become bigger and bigger. And this cannot be dependent on people who you can always blackmail or bribe, it has to be progressive taxation or similar thing. Not because people shouldn't become filthy rich, but because they shouldn't become filthy powerful. And neither should any corporation or any other organization or group of people. Still, I'm anti-socialist and pro-capitalism and pro-freedom. There just need to be limits for the amount of power individuals can accumulate, or the system is non sustainable.
    3
  2. Capitalism without control creates hell on earth. After certain point the power of those who buy work becomes too great. And eventually robotics and AI handle most of the work, which just makes more and more people to have nothing. This is mathematical fact, something that Hitler most likely knew really well. And corporations that operate globally cannot be controlled, this should be obvious. On most different industries there are handful of corporations that control +90% of the market. Tiny number of individuals that can operate almost above laws now have all the power. They have too much power and any market really cannot control them. This really leads to essentially global communism instead of national ones, and trying to overthrow a global system is insanely harder task, practical impossibility. Those in the control are pushing this system fast as hell now because people are catching up to their plans. I absolutely love freedom. But it cannot be absolute, as again it will lead to dictatorship and that can be proven through mathematics. I think we should change taxation to consist only for corporations, as corporations are "dead entities" based on the laws of the state, and thus we could argue that state is providing corporations some services and level ground to grow upon. With some tiny progressive taxation we could essentially limit the size of corporations and thus the power of individuals owning those corporations. Most of that tax money should just be shared with all of the citizens, each having equal amount. That way the system would be almost 100% consisting of private companies and services, but where there would be actual competition without possibility of too much accumulation of power. Though the sad reality is that this is impossible without doing it globally. It has been impossible forever now. It wasn't impossible when Hitler was in the power. I absolutely don't claim to know enough about Hitler's plans, what would have happened if Germany would have won the war. But I believe he hated capitalism because he knew perfectly well where it will lead. It's like jumping from an airplane. Some people know where it will lead, but most just look at the great scenery and praise the feeling of weightlessness. The 20th century the ground didn't seem to be closing in, but now we are seeing it coming closer faster and faster. Still, I'm anti-socialist and pro-capitalism and pro-freedom. There just need to be limits for the amount of power individuals can accumulate, or the system is non sustainable.
    2
  3.  @TheImperatorKnight  Absolutely and precisely. I'm certainly not advocating socialism or their solutions. Capitalism in general is the best system, but it's becoming increasingly dangerous as those oligarchs are becoming more powerful than anything, except central banks of course. Though it's not just about the oligarchs, as the problem lies within the concept of corporations whose goal is only to make money. If corporations would have progressive taxation, then all the negative impacts of corporate optimization, monopolization etc. would be negated with interest. I hate to even use the word taxation, and there could very well be different solutions if the monetary system would be changed (would require miracles), but at least here the progressive taxation works to convey the idea of limiting the power of corporations. At least from mathematical point of view that should lead to the best possible economy, assuming the progression is chosen optimally. Most likely economists could come up with algorithm that would lead to near perfect curve. The time we are now living in makes fighting socialism, and people who want it, the most urgent fight.
    2