Comments by "David Himmelsbach" (@davidhimmelsbach557) on "Russia sanctions: Can China u0026 India make up for losses in EU? | DW News" video.
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@alexdenisov7912 bln bbl a day is an obvious mis-print.
And, it's a fact, Iran has found that getting back up to her old tempo is no easy thing. Her actual 'swing' pumping rate is ~ 1,000,000 bbl/ day. Given enough time, and $$, Tehran could bring another 1,000,000 bbl/ day on line. But that would require about 1.5 years to pull off. America's sanctions have really caused a LOT of Iran's stuff to atrophy. (Crude oils are chemically aggressive against pipes, pumps, valves, hoses.)
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@catadoxas Kaddaffy told the world that he was going to cut off France and Britain from Libyan oil.
So, both nations declared war upon him.
Then, using Article V, Paris and London compelled Washington to bail them out of a jam.
That was the end of Kaddaffy.
Iran was not a serious seller of oil to Europe -- since 1980.
Iran sold to Japan, Red China, India, Singapore -- some others, from time to time.
Japan obtained a chronic waiver of US sanctions -- for years on end. Her refineries were dialed in to Iranian heavy, sour, crude.
Only at the end, Tokyo stopped importing Iranian crude -- as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia stepped up exports to suit Tokyo -- all of this arranged by Washington.
As I type, Washington is trying to get Venezuelan and Iranian crude back into the picture. Such a notion qualifies as a brain fart.
The true, real, and effective solution is to let the American oil & gas industries do their thing.
They can supplant Putin almost single-handedly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1