Youtube comments of The Critical Drinker (@TheCriticalDrinker).
-
11000
-
7200
-
5700
-
5500
-
4100
-
4000
-
3800
-
3700
-
3500
-
2900
-
2700
-
2500
-
2300
-
2300
-
2200
-
2200
-
2100
-
2100
-
2100
-
2000
-
1900
-
1900
-
1900
-
1900
-
1900
-
1700
-
1700
-
1600
-
1500
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1300
-
1300
-
1300
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
989
-
988
-
985
-
969
-
957
-
956
-
945
-
937
-
932
-
928
-
921
-
914
-
909
-
906
-
904
-
889
-
887
-
880
-
879
-
870
-
864
-
859
-
837
-
824
-
824
-
817
-
807
-
801
-
790
-
784
-
770
-
769
-
737
-
730
-
721
-
715
-
705
-
703
-
683
-
678
-
676
-
674
-
657
-
654
-
651
-
649
-
646
-
639
-
638
-
632
-
631
-
620
-
620
-
617
-
616
-
608
-
607
-
607
-
596
-
594
-
593
-
593
-
585
-
583
-
562
-
561
-
557
-
555
-
550
-
547
-
545
-
542
-
539
-
539
-
535
-
509
-
506
-
506
-
504
-
504
-
503
-
491
-
488
-
487
-
482
-
478
-
476
-
474
-
474
-
471
-
467
-
466
-
459
-
458
-
447
-
444
-
443
-
442
-
439
-
436
-
429
-
419
-
419
-
406
-
405
-
400
-
392
-
392
-
390
-
387
-
378
-
377
-
365
-
365
-
359
-
351
-
347
-
345
-
335
-
334
-
330
-
328
-
326
-
324
-
323
-
323
-
312
-
311
-
308
-
306
-
304
-
285
-
283
-
270
-
261
-
256
-
255
-
254
-
254
-
251
-
245
-
244
-
241
-
240
-
235
-
227
-
226
-
214
-
205
-
204
-
198
-
194
-
193
-
192
-
188
-
183
-
168
-
164
-
163
-
162
-
161
-
154
-
146
-
145
-
143
-
141
-
139
-
139
-
135
-
131
-
129
-
128
-
121
-
118
-
116
-
115
-
110
-
109
-
105
-
100
-
100
-
98
-
97
-
96
-
95
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
87
-
87
-
84
-
81
-
79
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
70
-
69
-
66
-
66
-
64
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
59
-
57
-
56
-
54
-
53
-
51
-
51
-
49
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I think for me it all came down to expectations. When I first played it, I expected a tight, intense survival horror game and I obviously didn't get it, so I had a negative opinion of the game. When I replayed it several years later, I went in expecting it to completely suck and was surprised to find it was actually pretty enjoyable. Certainly not in the same way RE4 or the Remake had been, but I wasn't bored either. I also appreciated the scope and sheer ambition behind it. Capcom really tried to deliver something epic with this game, and even though they didn't quite manage it, I think the game deserves props for what it tried to do.
Leon and Ada's campaigns were enjoyable for me, Chris' was weak and Jake's was kind of 'meh'. So overall two wins, one draw and one loss worked out as an ok game in my book.
Ultimately RE6 is a bit like watching a Transformers movie - I can totally see the faults with it, but there's enough going on to keep me entertained that I can just sit back and enjoy it for what it is, rather than what I wanted it to be. I can very much see why others were so unhappy with it though.
The controls weirdly didn't bother me. I found them broadly similar to RE5, albeit a bit on the sluggish side. Maybe I was just so taken by being able to fire on the move that I was willing to overlook other problems!
Appreciate such detailed feedback though. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That's a very interesting perspective, and although I did bring this up in the video, I didn't go into all that much detail about the implications of Wakanda's non-interference policy. The issue I have with this, particularly the example you gave of Shuri calling Ross a coloniser, is that the movie never goes so far as to outright criticise any of it. It's glossed over and bypassed.
Shuri for example never faces censure for her earlier comments. It's clear when she meets Ross that she has little respect for him, but it's not like anything happens to drastically change her opinion or force her to confront her own prejudice. If for example she'd been in some kind of trouble and Ross had saved her, thus proving he's a good man and forcing her to acknowledge this and respect him, then fair enough - I'd be fine with that. As it is, Shuri operates pretty much independently throughout the movie, never really getting into trouble or needing help from anyone, especially Ross.
It sets up a flaw in what could be seen as an arrogant, conceited character, then kind of forgets that it even exists.
Likewise, the attitude towards Wakanda by the end of the movie isn't "Oh my god, we've made such a mistake throughout our history. So much needless suffering, war and poverty that we could have helped prevent". Instead it's presented more like "Wakanda is awesome, and we've kept our awesomeness hidden for too long. Now it's time to show the world what we can really do."
Nowhere is this more evident than at the end with the obligatory sneering diplomat asking "What can a primitive country like Wakanda offer the world?", followed by T'Challa's knowing smile.
This is my issue with the movie. It might flirt with the idea that Wakanda and its ideology are deeply flawed, but it never comes to grips with this in the way it should. It's too preoccupied with glorifying the technological achievements and martial capabilities of its characters that its unwilling to properly address their flaws.
I didn't express these things as clearly as I could in the video, which is a failing on my part. But I stand by my criticism that the plot is simplistic, T'Challa is a boring character without a well defined arc who also made terrible decisions, supporting characters like Shuri are annoying, Killmonger's plan for world domination was far beyond his ability to achieve even with Wakanda's technology behind him, the battle scenes were silly and overall the movie told a thoroughly underwhelming story that didn't deserve the praise it got.
That's my opinion, but I appreciate how you took the time to outline yours.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"yeah, he does. He literally told jaime where to go to escape in the previous episode. Makes sense that he'd, you know, look there first? Idiot"
Yup, and of course there's no doubt they would make it down there with the castle collapsing all around them, that they wouldn't be killed by falling rubble or roasted by dragonfire on the way, or that Jaime would even make it to Cersei to tell her about the escape route in the first place? Not to mention that Tyrion was even able to get down there himself and easily find their undamaged bodies because Jaime's hand was magically visible. Yup, totally believable that all those things aligned perfectly.
"it's that character building that you cried about not existing at first. It's important to see tyrion's reaction to their deaths to cement his realization that he's made a horrible mistake to take dany's side and that its cost him dearly."
You really think the apocalyptic destruction he'd already witnessed wasn't enough to convince him he'd been wrong to support Dany? How much of a moron do you think Tyrion is?
"I guess you missed that scene in episode 4 where they state that they lost half the unsullied and dothraki. Not all of them, half."
Sure didn't look like it in Episode 3. It looked like they'd been completely annihilated by the white walkers. But yeah, sure, one throwaway line is clearly enough to completely negate what we've seen with our own eyes.
"tyrion explains this. Jon literally asks him if there's still a night's watch. Tyrion explains that yes, there is, and why, the very next line. Did you just go all "HURR DURR JON NIGHT'S WATCH AGAIN WHAT BULLSHIT WHY" and ignore all the dialogue that came after like some fucking simpleton?"
Again, with your reliance on dumb, throwaway lines. Just because the writers insert a line saying "the night's watch are still needed" without any elaboration or explanation, doesn't make the scene any less ridiculous. It doesn't change the fact that the very purpose of the night's watch no longer exists. There's no need for them to guard the north, because there's literally nothing to guard against. Their purpose is entirely moot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1