Comments by "Sean Cidy" (@seancidy6008) on "Is there a military reason behind the Nova Kakhovka disaster?" video.

Given his title focusing on whether there is a military rationale, his analysis being that this benefits Ukraine militarily, and Ukraine having came into control of one side of the dam in November, it is not clear why Anders does not even canvass the possibility the Russians did not demolish the dam. It turned out they did not do the NordStream pipeline demolitions contrary to what he assumed, so the likelihood is he is wrong again. Pretty remarkable considering he is a naval officer with expertise in riverine and undersea operations.
1
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 He was too busy to inform his viewers that the prime suspects are clearly nonRussian individuals operating in an unobtrusive way from a yacht , making a Russian state operation most unlikely. Morover, Russia would have did such a slick frame up and let everyone think that Russia had blown the pipelines for several weeks? Come on!
1
@andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416 Nothing much was made of the destruction of the pipeline by Western governments .One might have expected uproar if it was Russia. as the sabotage was in Nato waters. As I recall. Anders had some convoluted counter hybrid provocation explanation for Western governments remaining tight lipped. But the truth is Western governments knew it was done by Ukraine not Russia.
1