Comments by "Reg regan" (@regregan5755) on "Matsimus" channel.

  1.  @ph11p3540  it's because of the ports they inevitably visit and their respective countries laws more than anything else, most countries do not like random weapons being brought in on ships, international waters is not an issue.
    2
  2. If the warrior is a British vehicle why is the driver on the left?
    2
  3. I don't get it
    2
  4. If the stryker MGS is engaging or be engaged by tanks then does that not mean the standard strykers they are accompanying are in the same AO and so just as vulnerable? Not what they are designed for either so obviously not the overall plan for them either way.
    2
  5. Jack toy but the tank is "saluting" so it is supposed to be pointing that way anyway as it drives past. They are literally way to close to the podium
    1
  6.  @jacktoy3032  yip and the driver should be looking out for them just as much as the commander as they are both hull down, in fact the driver would have seen any markers even easier in this case. I have seen enough parades to know the commander and driver should have been in the hatch and this would have been easily avoided as well
    1
  7. So it could'nt reverse either?
    1
  8. They have a door as well, it is in the ramp.
    1
  9. Not if money has anything to say about it. Lots more letters left in the alphabet yet so keep the money train rolling.
    1
  10.  @mitri5389  haha what? I hate when facts ruin my yarns as well...it uses seawater, but you made it sound so believable
    1
  11. I don't take it as him saying how "amazing" it is more just saying what it actually has. Surely things like seatbelts would be an easy retrofit fix if such a problem even going so far as to swap out the entire drivers seat for something more adequate?
    1