General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Thurso Berwick
Asianometry
comments

Comments by "Thurso Berwick" (@thursoberwick1948) on "Asianometry" channel.

The entire world seems to be being pressed into similar ideas today. Bad economic mismanagement, appeal to emotions, repressive laws masquerading as "safety" etc.
30
@Yura135 We don't have a proper market economy in the west anymore. The government can shut things down at a whim and employs discriminatory taxation and even environmental tactics against smaller businesses and the general masses.
11
@axelNodvon2047 Very true, but Russia has always looked to developing the Asian part. This became a priority in the lead up to WW2, and was even the case in the 19th century.
9
And it's good way of controlling the peasants. I'd expect this from Beijing not Delhi.
9
A sick social experiment by true believers.
8
And yet ironically, the programme of that tendency continues through universities and media in the west, while edifices such as the USSR and its monstrous defence system have collapsed.
7
@OliverFlinn ... it's also not a binary choice between two abusive and materialist systems as KM claimed.
7
Much cheaper, albeit slower, to employ soft power, and influence through educational institutions, media etc.
6
Imagine the PRC without the PR bit.
6
Removes the hassle of you being able to control your cash as well. This isn't "Indian", this is happening worldwide.
6
"Malicious compliance" — Oh yes, I am afraid this is more evident by the day.
5
@ahndeux I'm sorry you had to go through that. The trouble is that I hear young westerners endorsing this system and saying, "it hasn't been tried properly yet." I wonder how much more suffering people have to go through to prove it doesn't work.
5
@lh2738 Environmental processes don't always work to human time. If you remove water from an artesian well, for example, the effects can tun up decades or centuries later. The effects of British industry during the Victorian era and pre-WW2 are still ongoing a century later or only just being repaired. And I agree with you. Much more could have been done to repair the Aral Sea in post-Soviet times. But cotton fields are more profitable.
5
The grains in deserts are too fine I think.
5
@OliverFlinn Whataboutery is not a defence.
5
@OliverFlinn I don't support systems that are inclined to kill or imprison me. Let alone ones that see us solely as economic units. And yes, that was classic whataboutery.
5
@danghoangluong2942 I can think of a few factors. Here are some others I didn't mention: * Corruption on a massive scale. * Desertification and destruction of Aral Sea; other environmental disaster. * Western radio, and even TV, being listened to by people in the Communist bloc. * The expense of maintaining such a large military. * Bad trading deals with certain poor countries. * Better quality western goods getting into their market.
4
@manofsan He's done something about Soviet computers as well as about the Sri Lankan collapse, Japanese corruption and Singaporean success...
4
@danghoangluong2942 Sort of. The War in Afghanistan also helped bring down the USSR. (Along with Solidarity in Poland, the Chernobyl disaster and the computing gap.)
3
@cicik57 Cheap labour will soon be surplus to requirements... after automation is complete. That means billions of unemployed vs a few thousand very rich people. They know the odds are not good.
3
@jaf378 The west has come to mirror it, and mutated forms of the same ideology are prevalent in western education systems. I was reading an Open University book on English literature from thirty years ago the other night and it was noticeable that many of the contributors were coming from that angle, notably Terry Eagleton... there were other historic figures such as Theodor Adorno and Franz Fanon quoted in the text who came from that angle too.
3
Argentina hasn't had a properly functioning economy in decades.
3
Terrible times. I hope you remind westerners of the cost that this system had upon people like yourself.
3
@ahndeux Yes, I agree with all that. Unfortunately there are attempts to roll out this system internationally. Some of the western leaders have been admiring the PRC, and its hybrid system, and many western youths like the philosophy.... One very PRC trait we see in the west now is how profit is private and debt is public. Many companies make money from state-owned infrastructure but the costs go to the public. Even Elon Musk is in on that game. Another PRC trait we see emerging elsewhere is their "social credit" system which is being introduced slowly.
3
@Asianometry The Russian Far East and its relationships with its neighbours would be interesting. They have the oddest relationship with North Korea of any of its three bordering countries.
3
@romanregman1469 Mate, we could be here all day. I'll try and do a short version. Most artificial lighting does not supply adequate Vitamin D, which affects serotonin levels. In some cases, it can also be bad for people, because a light source will be oscillating at a high frequency triggering migraines, epilepsy and so on. There are also psychological aspects which are too complex to go into, other than name dropping claustrophobia. We are not really subterranean creatures. We can spend time in caves and shelters, but it is bad for us to spend long periods within them, and the effect is cumulative.
3
@blondezeke6640 Slavery was around before capitalism. It will likely be around after it.
3
@M3ganwillslay If you want to live in a prison, that is your choice, but it is not yours to make for others. This is a step back into the Middle Ages, but with better technology.
3
Most of the USSR was in Asia... so...
3
@ngolong4070 How so? The US government has admitted itself that it has conducted such experiments in the past along with chemical and nuclear weapons.
3
After it dropped the uglier aspects of M.ism.
3
@nou4605 It's fact, not paranoia.
3
@nou4605 Happening in 120 countries. Coincidence? You think it is.
3
@Based Madara Misplaced? These are the same folk who have helped collapsed the economy worldwide in the last couple of years. We are seeing shortages on multiple continents now. They are the last people I want in charge. This could have all been avoided if they'd behaved sligjtly differently. They should not have been allowed to collect debts and charge high interest when people were unable to work because of restrictions- and that's just one thing.
3
@dasbubba841 So do private workers much of the time. Have you not noticed that a lot of the work private companies do now is for governments? In many cases, the profit is privatised and the debt is public.
3
Or the Soviet Union. Forgot that one, didn't you?
2
@cicik57 Thing is that what I'm talking about recently ISN'T the market economy but quite the opposite. Raw capitalism is an ugly beast, but we are being forced through the so called "Fourth Industrial Revolution" just now by most governments. The only Industrial revolution which apparently requires worldwide gaslighting and censorship.
2
@cicik57 These people are incredibly superficial in some respects. They can buy up superior intellects, but they are driven by the primitive instincts of greed and lust for power.
2
@whysoserious7553 Not "whatever", ever heard of the World Economic Forum? They helped create the mess we are in now. Look up their website.
2
@CRneu There was a major and involuntary rollback of their biological programme after the USSR collapsed. A lot of their labs ended up in other countries.
2
Central planning is also a clear issue here. It meant that bureacuracy slowed developments and demand from industry etc.
2
Wrong type. I'm sure it can be adapted.
2
The records are buried. Deep.
2
@blondezeke6640 Materialism is death.
2
Their entire history in a nutshell. It often became better when it moved away from its "ideals".
2
@OkarinHououinKyouma It's Feudal Ownership of the common people. You don't even have full control over your finances.
2
@utkarshdwivedi6600 They cannot control how cash is used unlike this. Yes, health data will be put on your card. Along with other biometric data. That's the end goal. It won't necessarily start with a card either. "We are Indians" This is a global phenomenon, decided globally, in places you've likely never heard of, in meetings you've never heard of, nearly always outside India. One of these happens in Switzerland every year at Davos. The fact the Indian government has signed up to this shows that they are part of this phenomenon.
2
@cat-man5522 Your ability to pay or be paid for anything can be switched off in a second remotely, that's how. It will happen accidentally or as a deliberate decision by someone.
2
@cat-man5522 p.s. I had my bank account frozen some years ago. The bank was in the wrong and compensated me. Luckily, I a) had another bank account and b) had some physical money. But if I was wholly reliant on them, or whoever, I could have ended up in a lot of trouble quickly. That wasn't even malicious, it was a mistake. The moral of the story is never let anyone else fully control your finances. Including those above you.
2
@shiveshsingh3169 I can use paper money to whoever I want, and the government cannot block me buying or selling with it. The government also doesn't know who spent what where with paper money. Unlike this. Paper money is nearly worthless, electronic payment is a method of surveillance and control.
2
@shiveshsingh3169 I largely agree with you. I think we are taking some very wrong turns just now. We will suffer for it in the future. There are alternatives.
2
@just_a_curious_thinker Because their ability to buy and sell is completely controlled by the authorities and can be switched off at a button. If there is trouble or someone becomes a problem to them, they can stop these people from being able to live.
2
Yes, Matthew 7, where Jesus says houses are better built on rock than sand. :)
2
Waste rocks from mining are an obvious answer. I also think the likes of PNG and its neighbouring countries would benefit from selling rock than PR China which dominates the east Asian economy. PNG needs the money more.
2
Ironically programmes such as these failed against the west, whereas the "long march through the institutions" which cost a fraction of the price continues to succeed.
2
Yet youngsters in the west are now in love with it. "It's never been tried properly..."
2
@manaspradhan8041 Most international economic activity was halted for months on end artificially, without taking adequate precautions for such a scenario e.g. debt prevention over that period. We now have supply chain problems with many different items in many parts of the world.
2
@mr.uthamaputhiran9790 We have more control than we realise, but collectively in this case. Whether people ever have the will to do that is another question.
2
@leland818 Not in the USSR, mate.
2
@ozymandiasultor9480 The core belief of it is clasd struggle (division). It is also absolutist, meaning that anyone who doesn't agree is expendable, as it has proven time and time again.
2
@conzmoleman It is an impressive achievement, but the system they lived under did many terrible things.
2
@robertagren9360 Tell that to Afghanistan 1979-1989.
2
@ozymandiasultor9480 it doesn't- "absolutism" means that only one point of view is considered correct. When you have that, then anyone who disagrees with it is in trouble. Its other problems are "the end justifies the means", and seeing people as blocs not individuals, meaning that individual suffering is seen as meaningless and sometimes necessary. (Even though societies, class etc do not exist without the individual.) Because it cannot succeed, shortly after a revolution, it has to look for scapegoats, to explain its failures, often people within the movement itself. It can either do that, or water down its policies, which the NEP did and China has.
2
How? The global economy is collapsing anyway, we'll all end taking those jobs.
2
It went from a war to a situation. Frozen conflict is the fancy term. Places like Northern Ireland, Palestine, Cyprus etc are all frozen wars. We have seen one "unfrozen" recently on the shores of the Black Sea.
2
What does "prowestly" mean?
2
@cicik57 It is not my phrase. I didn't come up with it. But governments around the world have passed legislation to enable it and push it. It has its own Wikipedia article, but it is very one sided, and does not list the other implications of this project or indeed whether it is a genuine Industrial Revolution in the first place.
1
@umanarquistacomfome7985 The governments of the world work in tandem. Did you not notice that in 2020? Marx was no prophet.
1
@linesided It happens again and again. We allow it to happen. Right now we have some people begging the ruling class to protect us from "misinformation" which beggars belief.
1
@johnmackenzie3871 Really? All of Europe west of Russia is bending over backwards to import new people. Even Japan is starting to do it.
1
KGB.
1
The pandemic didn't do this, the response to it did.
1
Taiwan has a lot more land area and needs it less. Ironically a lot of it is probably being diverted to Hong Kong.
1
Arguable. There are earlier ones. Some mentioned in the video.
1
Not true- they came up with some incredible inventions such as soace stations and the Ekranoplane - they just didn't have the system to support it.
1
A lot harder to investigate. "Tight lipped" doesn't even begin to cover it.
1
@whysoserious7553 Wasn't that an international effort?
1
@whysoserious7553 There is ample evidence of other countries being involved. There is that curious tabletop exercise that Johns Hopkins University undertook in October 2019, along with the World Economic Forum and others... it proposed all the moves that were undertaken six months later in many countries.
1
@vin5021 Deng's plans were not much like Singapore. For one, Singapore has to contend with limited land area and no empire. Deng took a very different route from Russia - greed has entered the equation openly but central planning is still there. Beijing continues to issue Five Year Plans.
1
This was a clever post until you started mentioning names. KH and the rhetoric she uses is a good example, but otherwise you are talking about machine types. Also as usual, you Americans think you are the only people in the room. What's been done to western Europe, Canada, Australia and NZ is just as relevant.
1
Nope, bureaucracy and central planning was the issue. They also didn't want to automate as it would put people out of work which was against their ideals.
1
They were lucky being Jewish... it was a lot easier to emigrate.
1
We're seeing this kind of mentality being instillled worldwide with "build back better" and the New Normal.
1
@winstonsmith478 China's already gone bad. The danger is more to Japan and South Korea.
1
"The fusing of state and private sector" - now happening worldwide under Davos
1
"The ends justify the means". In the end up, corrupting the west's educational institutions has proven a much more successful tactic.
1
Not natural, prearranged by international agreement.
1
It's much more basic than that. At its core is absolutism, i.e. it is absolutely right and all else is wrong. This inflexibility is pointed out in this video, it also led to all the deaths.
1
@Sundara229 Greenland is technically North American, but for most purposes, no, since it is so isolated and not part of the continent.
1
The British used to argue the same.
1
@Harry Groundwater That's where innovation comes in. The solution will probably be ridiculously simple.
1
The causes were Soviet, with delayed effect. Lake Chad is similar.
1
Lack of natural light.
1
@romanregman1469 No it isn't.
1
@rikilshah They're not "earning" it in some cases, they get it by overcharging some people and underpaying others.
1
@sunenymann9452 It doesn't have much to do with labour either, that's a Marxist misconception. Money is essentially value, and how much people are willing to pay for things.
1
@sunenymann9452 You don't need people to make things anymore. Neither digits on a computer nor in an automated plant. In the near future we'll barely need manual labour at all, since machines will be self-repairing.
1
@sunenymann9452 Manual labour will be extinct by 2050, if not earlier, according to some projections. Office work is also being replaced.
1
@sunenymann9452 Machines will build them. They will be self-repairing. Leave that 19th century German guy out of the picture - his philosophy has never worked in practice, and has never liberated anyone. The near future consists of a lot of people not working. A few thousand of them will be rich and live off investments. In fact, they will abolish money in the next few years altogether. It's already happened in Venezuela.
1
@blondezeke6640 Oh I do mate. You're using a 19th century German as a kind of prophet who thought in terms of heavy industry using large numbers of people. Thing is that he's never fully dealt with sentient machines, automation, the virtual world, let alone genetic engineering, or the ability to hack the human mind. When Neuralink is wired up to your brain, you really won't care about any of this. You should also NEVER trust any philosophy which treats humans as soulless automata as yours does. That makes you and I expendable and our suffering meaningless.
1
@blondezeke6640 You think K.M. is infallible. Artificial intelligence and sentient machines renders that philosophy completely obsolete. That is nowhere in his books. It's out of date. His philosopjy also sees humans as dispensable which is why it's caused so much bloodshed and suffering to create a pipedream. There will be no need for a proletariat in the near future since no one will do manual labour nor even be needed to make or repair machines. Yes, I've read more Marx than I've cared to. Very dry. Interesting interpretations of the past, useless on the future. He was also extremely racist as was Engels. I can't even quote the relevant pasages as YT will block them.
1
@blondezeke6640 Here's the rub: we won't be needed in the near future . All it takes is some giant artificial disaster and all of us die out except the select few. They can do this by a variety of means, many of which I can't describe on here due to to algorithms. Our numbers will be lowered and the remainder rounded up. We'll be gone and a few thousand will be left living it out in their palaces, their only "workers" a few robots and computers and possibly a handful of us peasants kept for "pleasure." Billions of us are dispensable to them. They don't need us, and are open about the need to "cut carbon". There can be no workers' paradise or revolt when all the workers are gone. They don't need us to acquire capital or produce like they used to. Soon they won't need us at all. By the way both KM and FE are very disparaging about the development of non-white peoples. You keep presuming that I have either not read this stuff or "misinderstood" it... which is much what a religious person would say if someone came out with an interpretation of their scriptures that their priesthood hadn't approved.
1
@blondezeke6640 I'm not "nihilist". Unlike you, I don't believe humans are just machines. However there are those who do, and if the whole transhumanist show gets on the road, then your theories will be as meaningless as mediaeval philosophers discussing how the supposed celestial spheres. The bourgeois vs proletariat binary is an increasingly dated concept as AI comes in and (manual) labour disappears. There are predictions that could happen by 2040 or 2050, if not earlier. These apply as much to modern capitalism as Communist theory: First step: stop thinking of people as economic or social units, and see them as capable of things that can go beyond mere economic production. Art and culture are sterile if tied purely to such a philosophy. Second step: admit that if the rights of individuals are abused, then so are the collective's, because there is no collective or mass without individuals. Third step: admit that absolutism, and the inability to look at points of view other than your own, inevitably leads to tyranny. You have no right to micromanage the lives of others. Fourth step: there is no "inevitable" flow to human history, we can be back to the Stone Age or extinct by the end of this century. Fifth step: the idea that the end justifies the means will also lead to cruelty and murder. If you condone that or commit atrocities, they will be with you until your dying breath. I suspect this is wasted on you. But try thinking outside the box, that may be what saves us.
1
@blondezeke6640 Full transhumanism is much further off, but it will be an accelerating process when it happens. We can already engineer genes and produce biological and nano- weapons. Wouldn't take much to release a few to get rid of the proletariat question, while the uber-bourgeoisie sit out the trouble. There will be no wealth gap after such a scenario. Digi-currency will be one of the steps towards eliminating that, and then the proles can be got rid of too. Private property may cease to exist but not in the terms you think of. A few thousand can live in palaces or virtual reality. This is more likely under current circumstances than some united proletariat overthrowing them in some sudden heroic struggle. Even if that happens there is no evidence that the state will wither away. Funnily enough the state is more likely to wither with automation than authoritarian rule.
1
@blondezeke6640 Nope, that's not what I'm saying. You think I'm endorsing some of the trends I'm pointing out. You are not free if those in power can grab what little you have even if it is under the guise of "fairness". It is quite easy for most of the human race to be eliminated without any real blow to those who rule us already. We are already surplus to requirements which is why our living standards are being reduced. They will use "fairness"; the environment or any excuse to do so. Many people will help them but as the saying goes, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions". Both Marxism and capitalism are materialistic dogmas, which lead to death and false hope. If we want a better future we need to move AWAY from materialism not into it. Marxism offers nothing more transcendent than capitalism, in fact it is its bastard child.
1
@blondezeke6640 As someone once said insanity is doing the exact same thing over and over and expecting different results. Yet this is what Marxists do. Humanity is in VERY deep trouble if it does not escape from materialism. Marxism, like capitalism, is entirely materialistic.
1
@blondezeke6640 Yet you're going to try the same thing over and over because you think it will work eventually. And you need to take over the entire world so that it can be tried out yet again on a global scale. If someone in a book from the 19th century told you that you could nail jelly to the wall "under the right historical and economic conditions"... would you keep doing it hundreds of times just to be sure?
1
That was the plan. Same with the IMF loans. Even the policies of the last two years worldwide.
1
Absolutism leads to inflexibility.
1
Well the last part is true. They abused the population which created resentment among workers and affected productivity
1
Absolutism kills.
1
"We have always been at war with Eurasia"- some famous British novel.
1
@manannaik1341 This stuff is WORLDWIDE. Which part of that can you not see? There are over a hundred and twenty countries pushing through the same thing... and you think this is just about India. Not even close. Your politicians never even came up with this.
1
@manannaik1341 I'm not "liberal" (in the American sense) and I'm bald. This is worldwide. You think it's just there. It's everywhere. This world is ruled by conferences and committees not parliaments. That isn't "progress", it's just another means to control people. Just you wait til they put "cashless payment" IDs into your bodies. You'll call that "progress" too.
1
@manannaik1341 Your country is run from Switzerland. Same as mine. The World Economic Forum discusses things like this behind closed doors. Politicians are jusw window dressing. All that "net zero carbon", trans rights and all the rest you've been hearing about recently... that all comes from there too.
1
@manannaik1341 p.s. If I tell you where I am from you will make it about me. I am not talking about me. Your politicians didn't make this decision. It was made at international conferences.
1
@manannaik1341 This whole thing is INTERNATIONAL. Go off and read the WEF's website. That is where much of this is coming from. Your government is signed up to all this. It just forgot to tell the people. (If you hate the CCP, then you should hate a cashless society... because it will be used to introduce a CCP style "social credit" system.)
1
@manannaik1341 "A mini India in Switzerland" – where your guys go and talk shop with other guys in poltics and big business. https://youtu.be/YCxG8YBHcAQ
1
@leezhieng No, buddy, much worse. Some of the C. induced ones make the Bengal Famine look like a picnic. Whataboutery is no defence for it.
1
Fourth
1
@西岚箱子 India has not succeeded in killing off seventy million of its citizens in artificial famines. Also fewer Gulags.
1
@西岚箱子 Whataboutery isn't a valid answer. What's so funny about Mao Tse Tung starving and murdering innocent people? Probably some of your relatives too. Whataboutery is just deflection. Mao is the BIGGEST MASS MURDERER IN HUMAN HISTORY. Bigger than Stalin or Genghis Khan. Bigger than the British. Anyone who idolises Mao should hang their head in shame. p.s. I'm not an Anglo-Saxon.
1
@leezhieng Slave labour is cheaper... which is used in some of those factories. Stop enabling it and the vile, anti-human system which has created it. Unless of course, you are a 50 Cent guy, in which case, I recommend you don't criticise Beijing for the sake of your family or yourself.
1
@leezhieng In India you can speak out. In China they shove you in a death camp.
1
@viewer-of-content The only time it might be justified is against an invasive species such as rabbits in Australia.
1
@ngolong4070 I'm not talking about recent times, mate. One of the things that can be said in favour of the USA is that it declassifies many things after a few decades. You can find your info in such documents. Much more so than some shallow trawl around the "interwebs" with Google. Using the "conspiracy" tag doesn't work anymore... thanks to declassified info we now know that this kind of thing did go on, that the Solidarity movement in Poland etc were funded by the west, and even that there have been serious attempts to investigate the UFO phenomena. The last one may sound wild but it's all there in official docs (including military footage released to mass media.)
1
@ngolong4070 The whole point of such programmes is that they are wholly or partly covert. The US military budget is vast, more than all the others combined. Some of that will be directed to cutting edge R & D for aircraft and weaponry, or maintaining expensive early warning systems, satellites etc. Part of it will be defending against whatever WMD is out there... and as part of that they will have to have certain pathogens under lock and key to develop effective defences against them. That's without even developing new ones. Anthrax and bubonic plague are likely ones. Probably a number of others we've never heard of.
1
That's going to happen soon anyway - why do you think the boss class seems so keen for people not to breed?
1
@catchnkill Surely the answer would be to buy sand from river dredging elsewhere.
1
Like Singapore?
1
Papua New Guinea has mining, and probably needs the money more than Australia.
1
@Harry Groundwater The mines are already there in PNG. Might as well give a poor country money before the PRC does with strings attached. Australian mines are often on Aboriginal sacred sites so it isn't cut and dried.
1
@jerryle379 I wasn't referring to that, I was referring to the doctrines of the movements German father, KM. But I didn't want to set off the automatic filters by spelling the word out.
1
Because desert sand has a very different quality to the beach type.
1
Most of theirs comes from the desert and not the shore.
1
The USSR claimed to be as well and some people still buy into the shtic.
1
@nou4605 That's the boiling a frog argument. The internet is not what it should be. Nor are mobile phones. People do not use either of those to have their privacy invaded, but that is what corporations do with it by underhand methods. What you are doing is creating a system where millions can have their ability to survive switched on and off at the whim of someone else. Maybe because of one's political or personal views. It is right out of the current Chinese tyranny. Governments do not represent the will of the people at all. In fact, you see them Instituting all kinds of laws and systems which are not popular with people. Sometimes they do things the other way round, like this, where they bring in a system and then force them into people into using it. Currently we are seeing different parties in different countries introducing the same systems. This has obviously been discussed behind closed doors for years. They only bother telling the public about it as it is rolled out.
1
@kamalkumar7978 I know that they can. But abolishing physical cash means ANY citizen can have their means of support completely destroyed in seconds.
1
@kamalkumar7978 Not at a personal level. If I have a bank note in my pocket, they can't render that particular one void, just because I am a political undesirable etc, and they can't stop me giving it to a beggar or a barman.
1
@kamalkumar7978 It happened to me, due to an error. My money was frozen because of a supposed debt. I later got compensation because it was wrongly frozen. I was lucky that I happened to have cash to get around this problem.
1
@kamalkumar7978 p.s. India is going 100% cashless, as is the rest of the world. It is being done gradually rather than overnight. In some parts of the west major businesses won't take cash anymore.
1
@theodiscusgaming3909 It's being phased out worldwide. Some businesses won't accept it. Venezuela is one of the first countries to abolish it outright. It's been done more gradually elsewhere.
1
Taiwan has a lot more land area than Singapore, so it is a lesser problem.
1
After this avoidable economic crisis recently, we're likely to this mentality spread worldwide.
1
@spartacus17. "It's never been tried properly" - how many more people have to die before you realise it can never work?
1
@KanishQQuotes Cough what? There are numerous examples I've never mentioned. Ones you'll have never heard of.
1
We're heading to becoming a world of them. Build back better. Stay safe. Scan your QR code etc.
1
America is under it not over it.
1
@larryroyovitz7829 Yet its elements are being brought in worldwide. Look at how there has been a unified response to a certain problem recently. We aren't even allowed to criticise it... like we won't be able to criticise the economic mess created by it or their solution to it.
1
Central planning caused this and is now being introduced worldwide. Look at the past couple of years - what have we seen internationally from it? Forcible introduction of ID and goods shortages.
1
Mars has a monster canyon. That may be where the canals come from.
1
@JohnGardnerAlhadis I know about Schiaparelli, thanks. But some of the canals are likely based on larger surface features that can be seen from.Earth
1
The biggest is absolutism which leads to death because it accepts only one viewpoint.
1
Really? Please look up Davos and Klaus Schwab. It's international, para-national indeed. They wish to bring down the USA and are succeeding over the last two or three years.
1
"An economic miracle like Korea" - Pyongyang is also part of Korea.
1