Comments by "😊 Erin Thor" (@Erin-Thor) on "Arizona 'audit' results reaffirm Biden’s victory over Trump l WNT" video.

  1. Post a link, and share what you think it said? All I know is that a recount done by hand, expressly banning computers, experienced staff, cameras and other party observers (Dems), doesn’t sound like an “audit” you could trust. All done by hand, all hand written records, it’s like we’ve returned elections to the 1800’s.
    1
  2.  @kalebjones5581  — She starts off by saying “it (their count) was within a hundred of the original count, but that there were statutes broken which did not affect the count.” The statures line I assume means laws, which has already been disproven in hundreds of court cases. Then a guy talks about how babies sleep patterns have to so with ballot signature verification patterns, explaining hoe a million of then showed bad signatures based on the comparisons of the baby sleep pattern inconsistencies, resulting 567 having bad signatures out of 1 million 500 thousand some odd signatures, which meant that the final. One count may have been off by a fraction of a percentage point. Again, based on comparison to babies sleep patterns compared to the signature patterns, final result was .00425%, variance. When they discussed 15,000 duplicate Republican votes, of people who submitted two votes (as instructed by Trump to do) that also did not affect the final vote. Dude, this is dribble. I’m sorry, pixel density, which they ESTIMATED BY EYESIGHT VIEWING (Not by computer) of millions of ballots, by different untrained people, then converting these ESTIMATES of pixel density, based on comparisons against baby sleep patterns, all to estimate the validity of signatures on the envelopes. They counted 34,000 duplicate votes in one county, again by Republicans, and based on Scribbles and blanks, and likely blanks but with marks. WHAT THE FREAKING HELL DUDE?! This means NOTHING! Edit. And please excuse me, but what does signature pixel pattern density have to do with baby’s sleep patterns? What possible correlation does this have, especially considering they found 567 out of how many million? Let’s use this logic, when I look at my lawn without my glasses on, it’s blurry, therefore because my baby slept through the night 2 nights out of 92 nights, this obviously must mean Trump won. 😳
    1