Comments by "š Erin Thor" (@Erin-Thor) on "WFAA"
channel.
-
196
-
36
-
27
-
āĀ @ftworthtexan9082Ā -- Re: "At what age do you believe killing of children should stop?" A. All. An unborn child is a life, any intervention to terminate the pregnancy is ending that life no matter how you spin it or count weeks. That said... the government has no say in forcing a mother to have a child unless they are willing to assume care for that child, cover medical and adoption, and if the laws against abortion put a mother or child's life in jeopardy, exceptions NEED to and MUST be made. As Texas law now stands, there are no special conditions or exceptions whatsoever. This makes the main issue an authoritarian one, Texas, Republicans, Abbott, all want to control the situation and prevent abortions, yet are unwilling to take any responsibility for the child, raising it, the expenses, or make allowances for abortion for medical reasons. This is authoritarianism at its worst.
20
-
14
-
14
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I'd like to hear fellow Republicans justify how they can vote for someone who is a liar. Repeatedly Abbott has lied, over and over. People here say that they support Abbott's stance on economy, crime, border, taxes, 2nd amendment rights, schools, protections for the unborn. Yet how do they know when Abbott's first impulse about Uvalde was to lie, then when caught lying, deny it until it was proven by video... So schools and crime are unknowns. Abbott's proven track record for big business when it screws the citizens is also known... So economy, taxes, who knows what else is also a big unknown. Border? Abbott views brown people, Hispanics, like Trump does, considers them all thieves, rapists and murderers, and his border policy is pure theatrics and again, lies. 2nd amendment rights... Yes, he supports them unconditionally. However that also puts kids and people at risk because of zero changes made to protect schools and public areas.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'd like to hear fellow Republicans justify how they can vote for someone who is a liar. Repeatedly Abbott has lied, over and over. People here say that they support Abbott's stance on economy, crime, border, taxes, 2nd amendment rights, schools, protections for the unborn. Yet how do they know when Abbott's first impulse about Uvalde was to lie, then when caught lying, deny it until it was proven by video... So schools and crime are unknowns. Abbott's proven track record for big business when it screws the citizens is also known... So economy, taxes, who knows what else is also a big unknown. Border? Abbott views brown people, Hispanics, like Trump does, considers them all thieves, rapists and murderers, and his border policy is pure theatrics and again, lies. 2nd amendment rights... Yes, he supports them unconditionally. However that also puts kids and people at risk because of zero changes made to protect schools and public areas.
1
-
1
-
Ā @DrtydeedsĀ ā No, the goalposts have not shifted. If they were ANY lower employee not a high level politician they would all be in prison. Sadly, what would land some people in either jail or the unemployment line (for taking Top Secret or TS/SCI papers home) does not automatically land a congressman/senator, head of state or VP or President in hot water. They have people that carry the papers, and for some reason that makes them only partially responsible. All I know is the term āWillful Retentionā is key on wether or not it is prosecutable for these elected officials. Presidents/VPās donāt always lose their TS status when they leave office, many hold that status as long as they are working on/with other elected politicians. I get your point, Biden did what Trump did. Research it, PLEASE. The difference is āwillful retention.ā Biden and Hilary were either informed or asked if they had secret documents, Hilary searched for, found and returned them. Bidenās team found them, then searched elsewhere and found more, in both cases they were immediately (within a day) returned. They worked with trump for about a year, he denied it, he lied, he had his lawyer sign off on a āwe searched and no such documents existā letter that may cost her legal license. So after a year they contacted the FBI and they searched for and found the missing documents. Think of it this way, you see a cop behind you, if you stop, you get a ticket, a slap on the wrist. If you flee⦠you risk prison. Same rule here essentially. Everyone can see the possible double standard, but the difference again is āWILLFUL RETENTION.ā
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1