Comments by "š Erin Thor" (@Erin-Thor) on "NBC News"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
NYC girl ā Nowadays darn near everyone has a gun. Crime affects everyone. I got a CHL permit after I was robbed and held at gunpoint for over three hours and the police were not even interested in taking a report. Does that make me or this man a threat to the police or anyone else? Heck NO! The issue here is police over-reacting and racial bias. Iāve been stopped and questioned while running and driving. "Yes officer, I have a gun in my car," "Doesnāt everyone?" is the common response. "Yes Officer, I have a gun in my pocket, my license and CHL are in my other pocket," "May I see them please? Your license, not the gun" is a common response. I donāt know the details of this incident, Iām not being judgmental either. Iām just saying having a gun is not, should not be a death sentence. Happens all the time, no big deal. There does however seem to be a trend where police feel āthreatenedā by blacks more than any other race. An officer "feeling threatened" is not reason alone to shoot a suspect IMHO, being threatened is of course a different matter entirely. Yes, I know. Radical statement. You are now free to verbally roast me over a fire. š
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ā @TheCh0sen0neisawesomĀ ā So... the cancelled checks paid to the Russian firms, the contracts obtained, thatās false news? Seriously? Trump and/or his campaign PAID RUSSIAN COMPANIES to both dig up dirt on Hillary (the server break in), and place ads on multiple platforms like Facebook, YouTube, Tumbler, etc. These are verified facts that were outlined in the FBI notes in the Mueller Report. We are not just saying Trump colluded with Russia, we have proof! That is TREASON by definition. Also with Ukraine in the next election, no matter how dumb you are you had the transcripts of the conversation, even recordings of Trump saying he was going to hold off paying them pending their announcing, not actually doing or opening as that had been done, an investigation into Hunter Biden. Itās on tape, clear as day. Trump just wanted to muddy the waters casting doubt on Biden just before the election.
Bottom line, you are saying you will follow Trump no matter what, even if itās treason or trying to overthrow the country. Tell me, what is the definition of a cult? Perhaps it would help you to see an example, find a mirror to see a cult member.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Anthony Cowden ā That is a common misconception as āSeparation of church and stateā is s concept, not a law. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The phrase "separation of church and state" itself does not appear in the United States Constitution. And your statement also belies a lack of understanding of my point. "Trump is a Christian, he is forgiven, he was put in place by God to save our country and return it to its rightful place as a God fearing nation." (Another quote from my pastor.) nothing he said, says, had done or does matters, what matters is saving babies, punishing sinners, and faith. There is literally a mentality that Democrats are baby killing hedonistic godless people, and it is the republicans god given mandate to save the USA. Ever wonder why trump supporters are so blind in their support of him? THIS is it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Chad Peterson ā I meant to add that using his name as a calling card is minor. The 30,000 people (total, over the last decade) who have sued him for his business practices and failed projects are what concern me. Whenever an investor loses money, be it trump university, trump condos, villas, whatever trump project they canāt sue HIM. His defense is always that Trump whatever, towers, etc., are just a brand, that someone licensed his name for the project, it wasnāt his project, he had nothing to do with it beyond licensing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ā @StyxNyx1Ā ā Do you mean my squatters rights joke? Are you familiar with squatters rights? Letās say that you and your neighbor share a property line on two identical 100 acre properties. However he puts up a fence, and you never notice that itās over the line. Years later you sell your land and the surveyor says you have 95 acres not one acre. Too late, the neighbor has 105 acres and gets your land as heās been using it for over five years. The AMERICAN INDIANS did indeed migrate over the frozen peninsula between Russia and what is now Alaska. The American Indians lived here long before America was rediscovered. Squatters rights is a law that says if you have been living on and using land for a certain time, and no one has objected, that land is yours, period. So even though native Americans may have also been immigrants, they were here, lived way past the squatters rights laws timeframes, so by that use and occupation, THEY are the owners. The prior comment pointed out they immigrated too. So my response was simple, they were here first, no one objected, so regardless of how they got here, this is American Indians Landā¦ I.e. squatters rights. Sorry you donāt see the humor of using current law as an example of American Indians being the true owners of America for a millennia to defeat the Republican argument that we are all immigrants, and equal owners by manifest destiny rights. I personally like that using our own laws to disprove our own assertions quite funny as it points out the weakness of the Republican argument. Sorry you donāt get that, perhaps you could ask a democrat to explain it to you?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2