Comments by "" (@Wingnut353) on "The Lunduke Journal" channel.

  1. The reason not to change it is a matter of principle, Stroustrup should understand that. Because there is LITERALLY nothing wrong with the title, on the other hand the foundation is being abused to harasses working group members.
    47
  2. I don't think there is ANYTHING dystopian about compelling corporations to forget about me even in active voice. You whole argument is a strawman based on the idea that individuals are the ones this applies to.... when it is written to target big data abusers.
    21
  3.  @cookiemonster208  Except if that protected group is a religious institution or not a minority.
    5
  4. The issue is.... the AI isn't forgetting its remembering not to talk about what it knows. Because there is no practical way to make an AI forget something without retraining it from scratch.
    2
  5. So, being a white straight male, I could join on the basis of systemic bias and discrimination they are representing right?
    1
  6. The crazy thing is most of these projects have buttloads of money.... the real solution would be to admit as many as want to join, even if they increased admission by 10x it would be better than ANY type of picking and choosing.
    1
  7. Nobody uses Lua like that, 99% of Lua out there is probably running on LuaJit ... Plain Lua is around 4x slower than LuaJit and that is without optimizing the code for LuaJit. Which would put it right up there with Hack and Typescript... and if you write code optimised for luajit you can probalby end up alongside javascript (with a much smaller runtime on LuaJit than JS).
    1