Comments by "Delibro" (@Delibro) on "Cool Worlds" channel.

You "only" need to drag space. Space can move quicker than at lightspeed. Of cause it seems impossible to move space, but 400 years ago it also seemed impossible to have people fly on a regular basis in steel tubes... just for vacation.
17
@sertu1462 Instead, we now CAN in principle synthesize gold. By fusion of atom cores until 79 protons. Of cause we don't have the technology yet cus we can't heat it to the necessary many millions of °C, and of cause it's not feasible, but we know how to do it.
12
@sertu1462 That is true. And yes, space travel is probably much farther in the future then all other future things. So also I think it will take us hundreds of years. But notice such things in the past, nearly all things that seemed to be impossible, later got resolved. So do I think about space travel.
6
Oh yes, thats right, if this becomes a trend in all daily life, how great would that be.
4
Can't we calculate the rough possibility of the beginning of life by saying: It needs at least 80 atoms to make a thing that can reproduce itself? So on billions of planets with each hundreds of millions of square kilometres it would take x billion years to just by accident combine those 80 atoms.
2
Yea, thats it. And also nuclear and other hazardous waste is then not a problem anymore.
2
19:19 What you conclude here is that there is a paradox at the earth, so then you must draw all lines in the reference frame of the earth. Then there is no paradox. You can also draw all lines from the reference frame of the STL ship, then there is no paradox too. The fault is the mixing of reference frames.
2
FTL might be achieved through a warp drive. When flying or messaging with warp, you don't move faster than light through space, but space moves. So, time dilatation should not happen. So no Lorentz transformation in the diagram. No paradoxes. Is there a mistake in my thinking?
2
No one ever claims that a fetus is no life. So and in that way one should also shelter the life of every fly, cus its life too, like a fetus?
2
"It may not be billions, but indeed many millions". That is not frustrating in my opinion, this is great. We have solved this parameter of the Drake thing. Important is not, are there thousands of species out there or trillions. Important is, is there someone else :)
1
Stubbornly In this case I'm not 😂 (17:43)
1
So, you think the ICE vehicles of the 60s and 70s are more reliable than those of today? I don't think so.
1
@Peter from NZ Regarding your point (a): That was my thought too, but I read that a grid even the size of Europe is way too small to work, aka will occasionally drop below 10 %. And larger grids are just not feasible today. Regarding (b): Nevertheless the majority of power consumption is still instant, the large industries consumers and commerce.
1
@Peter from NZ Your right, I didn't specified it more clearly cus I didn't remember it enough. What I remember: It said in a grid the size of Europe we would need more than 10 times more installed capacity than needed, so that at any given time to not have power outages with only renewable energy.
1
@Peter from NZ Maybe you are right.
1
@aristideau5072 The Dyson Sphere gives nearly unlimited energy, just build it increasingly.
1
@SamiiYou What if everything has been already predetermined only that every single detail is just like we would and want to do.
1
@Jm-wt1fs But we can calculate that I think, and it would be under a billion years on multiple planets, and that is the point of my post :) Of cause there may be other means of life to start that may be much faster, but at least a combination of 80 atoms just by accident should be a lower bound to the beginning of life. And that 80 atoms could form e.g. out of biomolecules or hydrocarbons of about 10 to 16 atoms which are abundant everywhere, thus needing only 5 to 8 parts to combine. Of cause this combination must be meaningful in a way that it can reproduce itself, but if we have quadrillions of tries (and we have that even on one planet), that should be possible. Maybe those 80 atoms are formed in a disc in a way that other suited biomolecules can attach to easier than non suitable ones, to form the same disc again and again. Then after time, some discs break apart and thus both parts start over. So we have the simplest form of life possible that most scientists wouldn't even call life being much simpler than even viruses. Then we only need evolution, which is inherent to every reproduction and we end up having meaningful life.
1
It is right that the pink arrows can be drawn horizontally and diagonal, both is valid, but observed from earth both arrows must be horizontally, whereas observed from STL both must be diagonal.
1
@LineOfThy Yea that's right, but as I wrote no frame receives a paradox, its consistent from either way.
1
Being special/unusual doesn't mean being (if you tie the constraints strong enough) a narrow percentage, but being outstanding on a property.
1
@Piddlefoots Your refer to the twin and grandpa paradoxes. Those are different things, I'm not referring to. You don't read my question.
1
Maybe I was unclear. My point was never weather faster than light travel is possible. My point is: If warp travel is possible, then the traveling ship don't move through space, rather space moves. Is there still time dilatation?
1
@Piddlefoots Nothing travels through space faster than light, you are right. But this I know and I know all of what you wrote also in your previous posts. But it doesn't undermine your statement. I will not respond to you any further because you are not reliable to me, you state random things that we all know, you change topic all the time, you give no answers to my questions, you are impolite. A star just outside the observable universe moves away from us faster than the speed of light relative to us, but he is nearly stationary relative to his part of space. The same applies to a ship that moves away from us using a warp drive.
1
I think the electrical grid is not the big problem, as most EVs can charge at night where there is less demand overall on the grid.
1
@jeffbdhdh I don't answer to nonsense.
1
@luiousy7329 I wonder to don't see more such comments. While being hetero, he sure is hot.
1
While I don't think the risk of messaging is high, I also think that the gain of getting a reply is not high, cus getting a reply after decades gets us more of a withdrawal symptom than the hoped communication. That is, if the aliens not give us a possibility to communicate beyond light speed or are already present with a disguised spaceship nearby.
1