Comments by "Mack Starr" (@stonehengemaca) on "The Hill" channel.

  1. You could see it in the witnesses. They don't want to appear to be helping the defence in any way. They don't want to be the one that gives the evidence that may reduce Chauvin's sentence.
    17
  2. You do realise that donald trump was "the government".. And he didn't take the opportunity to be the first human being to prove that life exists somewhere else in the universe. He'd be selling merchandise, hats with aliens on them. There's just no way trump is capable of keeping that secret. Impossible. That alone is the number one proof that the American government isn't hiding alien crafts or beings. Sorry folks. Well that and the debunking by Mike West of every clip they are showing in this segment.
    3
  3.  @Spicemilktea  He pleaded the 5th and didn't testify
    3
  4. 🤣🤣
    3
  5. He's provided zero evidence to discredit..
    3
  6. Excellent. Next!
    2
  7.  @njon23  So you ARE denying there is far right extremism?! 🤔
    2
  8. It's irrelevant. He's the equivalent of "bloke down the pub said"
    2
  9. Let's have a proper investigation and dismiss cases where evidence is withheld or not available, and bring charges against anyone lying under oath.
    2
  10. If far right extremists use your platform to organise riots where people set fire to a building with people in it, and you refuse to give the police data to assist serious investigations, then you are implicit. Seems straight forward to me.
    2
  11.  @NinjaThatLongboards  That's for the trial to determine. People threatening the court to produce a verdict without looking at all the evidence is wrong surely?
    2
  12. If only there was any proof.. 🙄
    2
  13.  @Does_it_come_in_black  Far left extremism, is NOT discriminating against trans people. Far right extremism is burning buildings with people in them.. Totally 2 sides of the same coin. 🙄🙄
    1
  14. It was used to organise riots in the UK where people set fire to buildings with people in them. If you don't perceive that as far right extremism, then YOU are a far right extremist.
    1
  15.  @jerrymoore838  Well at least you are acknowledging far right extremism exists. Baby steps.
    1
  16.  @DavidParrott-hw7yt  Uhuh. Go figure.. Wow that sound like something a crazy person would say.. Go figure.. 🙄
    1
  17.  @januarysson5633  Because far left "extremism" is not discriminating against trans people. And far right extremism is setting fire to buildings with people in them.
    1
  18.  @Koujujutsu  so calling someone a fast right extremist because they set fire to a building with refugees in it, makes them a far left extremist? Gotcha.. Big brain energy.
    1
  19.  @FreakazoidRobots  Can you give an example of what YOU think is far left extremism?
    1
  20.  @FreakazoidRobots  Yes that anti-fascist group is described as far left. I wouldn't agree that opposing fascism is extreme though. Is that it?
    1
  21. "Woke" has a definition. The right just change the definition to suit what ever they're crying about at the time. They need to make a new word if they want to define a words definition.
    1
  22. What's the point of this? If there's evidence of criminal behaviour, then act on that and prosecute them. If there isn't any evidence, then why name them? Being in a phone book of a paedophile doesn't make you a paedophile.. It shows you have very bad judgement and you'll probably do ANYTHING for money (and so probably shouldn't be president of a country..)..
    1
  23. His evidence is... Bloke down the pub said.
    1
  24. The Jewish community isn't doing itself any favours. Groups purporting to represent Jews in the UK blocked the documentary exposing how Jewish political groups assassinated the character of Corbyn and influenced British elections. Now the Jewish state is committing ethnic cleansing. I'm not surprised there's a rise in anti-Semitism. 🤷‍♂
    1
  25.  @NinjaThatLongboards  I'm talking about the Chauvin case.. You?
    1
  26.  @NinjaThatLongboards  I'm not saying he's innocent or guilty, that's the courts job. I'm not saying are trying to help Chauvin or not. I'm just stating an observation that the witnesses looked scared or concerned that they might give the defence team an answer they can later use to reduce his sentence. The jurors are anonymous (I assume) but the witnesses have no protection from those that could see them as implicit in a lesser sentence.
    1
  27. She should have said, "Donald Who?"
    1
  28. If only there was evidence..
    1
  29. I like how they present people that work in the military as being unquestionably honourable and practically unable to tell a lie. America treats the military like they are infallible. It's all quite hilarious. All the people I know that have been or have tried to join the army have all been mildly racist and will jump on ANY conspiracy theorists band wagon. They aren't the brightest individuals..
    1
  30. Lucky they used their free speech to vote to let someone have free speech. I think some folks here would have imploded with the paradox if they voted to ban him.. 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤦‍♂
    1
  31. And trump managed to keep his mouth shut? Hmm 🤔🤔Hmm Hmm Hmm 🤔🤔Didn't take the opportunity to be the centre of attention? 🤔🤔Hmm Hmm Hmm 🤔🤔
    1
  32. Trump hasn't seen any evidence of aliens. Do you think it's possible that trump could stop himself from being the one to tell Earth we aren't alone? The fact trump hasn't attempted to make money from aliens is the greatest proof America doesn't have any crashed alien craft/technology or have any classified documents on alien life. 🤷‍♂
    1
  33. How is it fair to have testimony with zero evidence or any opposition? It's difficult to refute a claim when no evidence is provided, but the Tic Tac video, which is claimed to be the most powerful evidence for alien craft has been debunked and recreated by Mike West.
    1
  34. It's an easy call to denounce ethnic cleansing. It is extremely disturbing to see the influence Israel has on the rest of the world as they all stumble over themselves to spread Israeli propaganda and refuse to condemn Israel's actions. Especially since it was only moments ago, the same nations didn't hesitate to call Russia's actions war crimes.
    1
  35. This analogy works if the packages are transparent and clearly labelled "drugs" "laundering" "criminal conspiracy" "contraband". Then yeah, they'd be implicit in crime using the postal service.. 🙄🙄
    1
  36.  @thorns  Ah but the CEO of Telegram was asked to provide data on users that organised the riots in the UK that led to people setting fire to a building with people in, and his refusal makes him implicit. If you're spreading Russian propaganda then don't be surprised if you're treat like a traitor, a spy or a terrorist. 🤷‍♂ You'd want a Russian to be arrested if they were found spreading lies to destabilise your country, right? So what's the difference?
    1
  37. Why? What are you free to say that is being oppressed?
    1
  38. So scared to come forward? I'm sick of them coming forward! They're like the right wing racists that complain they are censored and can't say whatever drivel they've just said.. They'll do anything except provide any evidence.
    1