Comments by "chf gbp" (@chfgbp6098) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. Overworking most likely killed that poor young doctor. :(
    8
  2. Indeed, this virus will Save european governments huge of amount of money for years to come. I think that s why they are giving it a free run.
    8
  3. Statistics. U only need to lower R to below 1 to stop the spread. 14 days given what we know now is still optimal. Nothing in life is certain. It s all about playing the odds intelligently.
    6
  4.  @lestatangel  : sure. they r evil and u r in the know.
    6
  5. Italy s out of control. Does the Rest of Europe want to be sitting ducks? Seems so. :(
    4
  6.  @googlereviewer1944  by choice?
    4
  7. It has hardly spread anywhere apart from China. 99 percent plus in china. No deaths outside China, and inside it s about 3 percent. What s the fuss?
    4
  8. And Internet shows that few people take that advice
    3
  9.  @Stranglerxx77  : Country  PrisonPopulation per 100,000 US   2,293,798.   737 CHINA   1,548,498.   118 RUSSIA   874161.   615 1949: US population=150mil, Life Exp=mid 60s. China population=450 mil, Life Exp=mid 30s Now: China pop=1400 mil, Life Exp=mid 70s, with longer healthy life span than US (WHO report). Infant mortatliy dropped from 240/1000 to 8/1000 in the Same period.  Literacy rate also now almost 100% from 20% in 1949.
    3
  10. Mmm...D and G...can we trace when and where this happened?
    3
  11. Any comment on Sweden's Herd immunity approach? Its death Rate seems to be 11 percent but the curve has flattened without severe lock down. Is it going to work?
    3
  12. Not to mention it s a small Island...not Everoyne has that luxury
    3
  13. Stay away from cities. For so many good reasons.
    3
  14.  @janetairlines1351  : how so? https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases Show us on the timeline at what points did the WHO fail to do anything?
    3
  15. WHO is not God. It gives advice based on the best known AT the time. That some people are top arrogant or too stupid to heed the advice is a totally different matter.
    3
  16. It s ironic that it s Communist China that has been not exporting poverty, starvation and refugees all over the West and now it s Communist China that s keeping the outbreak (affecting an 11-Million strong population centre) well contained within its border. Do u seriously think any other 'free' 3rd world sh**holes would do better? Or r u willing to welcome and liberate all these potentially diseased and desperate Chinese with open arms?
    2
  17. Would u be any happier with them if they did tell the world to lock down? Do u even know what that means to your life? This crisis has shown that the world is full of, absolutely full of, reponsibility free loud mouth mean spirited retards. And they dont even know who they are cause they r that thick.
    2
  18. I fear that the good doctor's faith in the integrity of the companies and people developing these products is misplaced. The lack of corporate accountability in the system, absent for AT least 3 decades and getting worse, means that it s one way bet for them. Heads they win. Tails you lose. The public health risk of an vaccine is huge. Political expediency + skewed monetary incentives + public desperation is s receipe for disaster. I hope i m wrong. But....
    2
  19. Pigs might fly too.
    2
  20. See no evil hear no evil. No testing means no problem. It s a strategy i guess. H1N1 pandemic was handled this Way by America. Maybe they ll get lucky again.
    2
  21.  @user-uy6uc5ey5q  wow. I guess this is a revenge of the poor and the maltreated.
    2
  22. Yet there re 1.4 bln of them...so maybe it helps them
    2
  23. 2 and both Chinese or from China anyway.
    2
  24.  @robertdunlap4975  These commies have been far more right about China and the Chinese in the last 90 years than their enemies though, let alone random retards who are all mouth and no trousers...harsh but true.
    1
  25. Most people, never having to stake their money or reputation, have an extremely unhealthy relationship with theory/facts. That is, no respect whatsoever for facts and reality and just go with whatever tickle their baser instincts. Scientists, doctors, investors, etc. of which i am one, get slapped in the face by reality all the time. So habe developed a healthy respect for facts. The rest just believe whatever they like, the hell with facts and evidence. Not having to ever risk anyhting and being protected most of the time in effect from the worst of life, these zombies never need to wake up. U d think at least they can do us a favour by not polluting serious discussions with their puffed up tripe.
    1
  26. And meanwhile, still only a handful of cases outside Asia and hardly any deaths. Someone s exaggerating and benefiting from the hype.
    1
  27. Really? Dutch courage indeed.
    1
  28.  @Vivianvixxen  Gas masks? OK. That s a bit too much. I d say...what a prick. Lol
    1
  29. Coughing? U'd better take care
    1
  30. U r falling for the usual anti-chicom Chinaman s lies. 70 years of making a living lying to the West and misinforming the world about Chicom's China. Dont believe me? Just watch how this episode devleops and how many of their lies come true. Chicom is no saint but anti-chicom Chinaman have even less morals and scruples. My policy on this is to stick with the devil you know, especially the devil that is in the limelight, will be held responsible and literally has no where to run.
    1
  31. Taking the data outside China , together with the likelihood of under Reporting of infections inside China, the death Rate of the disease s probably minimal??? One more Week of the Same pattern surely would Make it the conclusion Hard to deny?
    1
  32. People have been parroting that Mantra for 70 years now and yet, how right habe those people been about China in the last 70 years? A near perfect record of a big fat 0 i d say. One would have been far better off basing one's predictions on official data. Official, by definition is a permanent record and open to the world for scrutiny. I d much sooner start with that than anything from the parrots mechanically muttering wishful thinking. It s funny how the braindead can filter out facts and maintain a preferred theory almost indefinitely. The real reason for such behaviour is of course that such people rarely need to put their money where their mouth is or their neck on the line. Unlike those who do...and 'those' include chicom, whose neck has been constantly on the line.
    1
  33. Keep praying.
    1
  34. Lol. Go back to school.
    1
  35. If only the european governments habe taken it as seriously as the good doctor here... :(
    1
  36. H1N1 in 2009/10 that was a pandemic. Google it. And compare and contrast
    1
  37. The death Rate so far is very unbalanced. There r now twice as much cases outside the origin city Wuhan. And it s been 2 Weeks plus now. Yet overwhelmingly, most of the dead are in that city. There IS vurtually none outside that Region and definitely none outside China. So what s behind that?
    1
  38. Seems very localised both in terms of geography, demography, and patient profiles (for severity). Read about the H1N1 outbreak of 2009/10 and weep.
    1
  39. It s kind of awe inspiring to see how research tries to keep up with the virus in real time. Can only thank the professionals dealing with the crisis on the front line and in the labs. Meanwhile, the ignorant masses and the media continue to make me question why bother...does human deserve to be saved? Maybe it s time to give other creatures on earth a chance!
    1
  40. Thanks for the info. Best of luck! Our thoughts are with you. God bless!
    1
  41. Stil not really spreading, is it? How many outside China? How many died? How many non-Chinese? And within China, how many outside the disease area? How many dead?
    1
  42. Your optimism is commendable. But the crisis has expos d so much uglisness in humanity, i doubt it s worth saving. Have u considered the possibility that we are the bad guys? And nature is desperately trying to fight the cancer that is us?
    1
  43. For those who decry WHO...it doesnt have armies to force governments and people to Stop behaving irresponsibly. And if they do, am sure the Same people would be pontificating about freedom and interference from unelected jonny foreigners etc. etc. Talk is cheap. What can you offer or do for the world?
    1
  44. That s good news at least.
    1
  45.  Ronda Leistiko  u got pollution from China?
    1
  46. My partner is a doctor in the UK, her mom is an HIV pharmacist and my sister is a researcher on viral meningitis in New Zealand. Like the good doctor here, they are horrified by the misinformation being spread, especially the ones that use pseudo-scientific terminologies and cite publications that are clearly greek to the spreaders. Yet the human appetite to will juicy misinformation to be true is primal and irresistable. Coupled with our inate defficiency in understanding the rule of logic and what constitutes proof, one can only marvel at the fact that the scientific revolution has managed to happen at all.
    1
  47. I think the little Experiment so far says the world is too connected now for isolation and containment. All it takes is one or two weakest links in the chain. Am unfortunately travelling atm, constantly amazed how addicted people are to moving around, often out of boredom, nothing else. Sigh. And the lack of precaution by people (in Europe anyway)...
    1
  48. The irony of the religious sect...not sure if to cry or to laugh.
    1
  49. Google says the vaccine was apporved for Chinese military at the of June. What s the trial period to test a vaccine? Also given low prevalence, event numebrs must be low and slow to build up. Surely it s faster to test it in America or Brazil or India.
    1
  50. Debunked. Most virus have those in their sequence. It s like saying i have this DNA/RNA segment and the red cabbage hase it too. Therefore i am made from the cabbage, and vice versa.
    1
  51.  @ashyosings5089  As far i know the indian scientist who originally raised the issue has withdrawn his claims and accepted peer consensus/counter-evidence. I'm not qualified. Though I m a physicist by training...so i do know something about research and the nature of proof. My sense is that this is pseudo-science bullshit. But you can keep track of development on the topic and see what happens.
    1
  52.  @ashyosings5089  that in itself is not surprising. antiviral is antiviral. my sis works on viral meningistis. non of these are strange. for perspective, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic Perspective: 2009 H1N1 world pandemic, started in America via Mexico: lasted 2 years. Killed, final agreed number 284,500 globally. Infected 10s of millions. Vs now: 50 odd in the West. Havent channged for days. Mostly Chinese travellers. None died. Almost all AT Risk population locked down in that city and province in China.
    1
  53. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic compare and contrast. Gives one some perspective on the current hysteria. That was the H1N1 Pandemic.
    1
  54.  @s._3560  u r trying to reason with people with the mentality of a spoiled medicore 6 year old...
    1
  55.  @johnwhite626  =a spoiled slow 7 year old in the body of a middle aged couchpotato. Just a guess :)
    1
  56. In vitro, strong detergent would kill the virus also....too many biotechs with the wrong incentives. They dont need an actual successful End product. They jsut need to boost their equity price and get out before the end.
    1
  57. Switzerland has been criminally negligent...
    1
  58. Cause 'everyone' has no skin in the game, no responsibility, is generally mindless and fond of parroting stuff that makes them feel 'alive'. There r literally hundreds of thousands of experts working on this for real. And official meassages from any sizable Country and UN Organisation are on record forever in public. That vs. The average joe pontificating about life and the world between scratching his arse and stuffing his face? What s so hard to understand?
    1
  59. Those poor people on the ship. vicitms of the hysteria generated i d say. They should have been Tested and let off on day one, instead of being locked in waiting to be infected. Wtf! 2020 and this is allowed to happen and no one in the world is speaking on their behalf. Humanity is cowardly and meanspirited. They should collectively sue someone. Although am not sure. Whom. The rest of humanity i guess.
    1
  60. Where have u been? Under the cover, along with most the european authorities? What an absurd accusation against WHO!
    1
  61. Worse than that. Listening to Bob M? Nope. Smoking and concocting stories and misinformation to make the crisis worse...mainly because the world thinks it s a Chinese Problem...soon i fear the safest place from this outbreak would be China. I d say within 6 months maybe.
    1
  62. Same ole Same ole... :(
    1
  63. Believe anti-chicom yellow Chinaman at your own peril. They ve been misinforming the world on Chicom's China for 70 years...extremely successfully. Why do u think chicom always seems to do better than expected over any 5 year period? On this viral outbreak, i doubt it d be different. Remember this in a few months and see, if yet again, reality has left their lies behind.
    1
  64. Why treat them as special at all? Death Rate outside of Wuhan and outside of China are tiny. <= 0.5 percent? It s jsut a bit worse than a flu. Not sure what s going on in the city, probably all the old and sick stayed behind and the infected numebrs are far higher than offically detected.
    1
  65.  @Campbellteaching  that s true. Sorry. I didnt mean to mimimise. Just felt there s been too much hype, news media practically hoping it gets worse.
    1
  66. I ve been wondering the same. Only rational explanation, and i dont like conspiracy Theories as anything goes once u abandon basic premises, i can see is that there IS self Selection at work. Most of the infected are from the city or visited the city. So those caught outside tend to be those healthy enough to make long trips. While those who stayed behind tend to be those already ill or old or having existing medical conditions. This is consistent with the fact that most deaths occur in people who r old or with existing conditions. Alternatively, as many would, one can assume that China and WHO are lying big time. Time will tell. I dont see what benefits the liars hope to gain given that time will tell extremely quickly in an viral outbreak.
    1
  67.  To Release is To Resolve  to what end? Viral outbreak is not soemthing anyone can hide, not even chicom. Or r u one of those who habe been saying for the last 50 years that China has been lying about its population, its GDP and all the chinese money....and tourists, students and busineses/individuals buying up Western properties are all fake...if so, yes then u r being self-consistent. But time will tell, as usual, if u r consistent with reality or not.
    1
  68.  @radovanprezmetsky585  the ratio in Wuhan has been steady and settling well as the numebrs grow. The infected populations outside of that province are, as far as i can gather, people from that place or visited that place. So the only difference i can see between the two cohorts is the ability to travel. Hence my theory. This is also consistent what s what s observed from those caught outside of China. 2 death both very near China. No death, depsite larger base number, further afield. All jsut working theories. Data can change. Theory can change.
    1
  69. R0 2.2? Discuss. Wasn it supposed to be 3-4?
    1
  70.  @ChiDraconis  OK. Thanks. Would be interesting to See an update next week.
    1
  71. The swedish industrial animal husbandry approach to the virus is simply unrealistic to countries with more people or more diverse sociopolitical agendas.
    1
  72. Let s hope it stays that Way. But the numbers from outside that province and outside China have been pointing this Way consistently EVER since the the beginning...death rate <= 0.5 percent , mainly in the elderly and the chronically ill. But hey that s boring. People much prefer to be fed scary Stuff while knowing they are safe. Much Like enjoying a horror film. Except that this IS real life and people are actually dying albeit far away and of another country. the whole thing so far tells me that humanity is basically cowardly, cruel and irrational. The worst combo. People like the good doctor here and all those experts working to resolve and stop the crisis are very few and far between indeed.
    1
  73.  @lestatangel  lol. I dont even know i have a channel. Am pretty tech ignorant. Look in the mirror in a few months' time, and ask yourself the hard question...
    1
  74. 👍
    1
  75. It s ironic. At what point is the cure worse than the disease? If u behave as if it s ebola , does it matter what the disease actually is any more? Does it matter if the disease is not ebola but by all the numbers around the world some kind of infecticious but non-fatal severe flu?
    1
  76. Exactly. Collective mania.
    1
  77. If infection has been under counted then death Rate is even lower, as data outside China shows, and world data is consistent with data outside Wuhan and its province.important silver lining.
    1
  78. Italy...the weakest link. :(:(
    1
  79. Europe has an older population ....take that into account please.
    1
  80. U got my vote for best question of the day. Lol.
    1
  81. Any comment on the phenomenon that people who blame the WHO/China the most tend to be the same people who favour the relaxed 'herd immunity' approach? In the West anyway. Not sure about other countries.
    1
  82. Mmmm...still more chances of being run over in the street...life s a risk. It s about prioritising and rank ordering the risks correctly. No non-chinese death after over a month of this big bad frightening ultra infectious plague taking over the world...silver lining anyone?
    1
  83. Still only 300 odd in Asia and 80 in non-asia. And no deaths. Outside aisa. Only 2 in non-china Asia. After nearly a month. Can we draw any statistically valid conclusions based on these?
    1
  84. death seems to occur overwhelmingly in the origin city. almost none outside of that region. it a been a while and there have been enough cases outside of the region to have statiatical significance. so why the huge imblance? given that the dead were mostly the old and the weak, might we draw the conclusion that if one is robust enough to travel long distances than one is robust enough not to die from the virus? if so, what should the world do? it s infectious, no doubt. but it doesnt kill much. what should public policy be?
    1
  85. How reliable are the Tests? Different countries seem to be using different tests and there seems no standard reliable tests. What s the latest and it st Info on this issue?
    1