Comments by "Vic 2.0" (@Vic2point0) on "DUBUNKING Right-Wing Anti-Trans Myths" video.
-
8
-
@nvna1111 The point wasn't to compare "credibility" (which, anyone who can't give an objective, workable definition for "gender" shouldn't be considered an expert on the subject anyway). It was simply to show you why trying to redirect me to someone else to substantiate your position is silly.
"ur also right that basic research is just like a wild goose chase."
It is when I continuously come up empty-handed. No so-called "expert", no scientist, no doctor, no anyone has been able to define their terms in an objective way (that would support transgenderism). You don't believe I've looked hard enough. I don't believe you're truly confident there's a good answer; otherwise, you would've given it yourself.
"its a mystery how misgendering every trans person you meet-"
Not possible, on your worldview. So long as you fail to give an objective definition for terms like "man" or "woman", no one can ever be correct or incorrect in using these terms. Ironically, it's only those of us who reject modern gender theory would could accuse others of misgendering us in a coherent way.
"and denying their identity might fuck them up,"
Someone disagreeing with your beliefs should never mess you up...
5
-
4
-
@nvna1111 "im not here to define and explain to you all the nuances of gender"
Clearly. But you made the claim that I'm incorrect on this. I'm just saying that in order to substantiate your claim, you would need to explain why I'm incorrect. Defining "man", "woman", or "gender" would be a great start.
"you wrote a dumb and disrespectful comment."
1. You haven't established that it was dumb. Indeed you're now saying you're not inclined to even try.
and 2. Disagreement =/= disrespect. Or, if you're just protesting the fact that I'm disrespecting the worldview itself, there's no such thing as a moral obligation to respect ideas, beliefs, etc.
"if you truly have any motivation to learn,"
Not the topic (I could be the closed-minded type and still be correct on this). But do you really think you're the first trans advocate I've spoken with? How many hundreds or thousands of subscribers to this worldview (including "experts") must I talk to before I'm allowed to disagree with it?
"you claim it doesnt make sense."
I've given reasons why it doesn't make sense, actually. The only one making assertions without backing them up here, is you.
"will only serve to ruin trans peoples lives"
What exactly are you saying will ruin their lives? Me disagreeing with them? How would that happen if they're otherwise mentally healthy people? Again, if you want to establish that I'm wrong here, you'll need to explain why. Sending me on a wild goose chase won't work anymore for your side, than if I were to tell you "Transgenderism is incoherent, and just watch all of Matt Walsh's videos if you want to know why".
3
-
2
-
2