Comments by "Vic 2.0" (@Vic2point0) on "DUBUNKING Right-Wing Anti-Trans Myths" video.

  1. 8
  2. 5
  3. 4
  4.  @nvna1111  "im not here to define and explain to you all the nuances of gender" Clearly. But you made the claim that I'm incorrect on this. I'm just saying that in order to substantiate your claim, you would need to explain why I'm incorrect. Defining "man", "woman", or "gender" would be a great start. "you wrote a dumb and disrespectful comment." 1. You haven't established that it was dumb. Indeed you're now saying you're not inclined to even try. and 2. Disagreement =/= disrespect. Or, if you're just protesting the fact that I'm disrespecting the worldview itself, there's no such thing as a moral obligation to respect ideas, beliefs, etc. "if you truly have any motivation to learn," Not the topic (I could be the closed-minded type and still be correct on this). But do you really think you're the first trans advocate I've spoken with? How many hundreds or thousands of subscribers to this worldview (including "experts") must I talk to before I'm allowed to disagree with it? "you claim it doesnt make sense." I've given reasons why it doesn't make sense, actually. The only one making assertions without backing them up here, is you. "will only serve to ruin trans peoples lives" What exactly are you saying will ruin their lives? Me disagreeing with them? How would that happen if they're otherwise mentally healthy people? Again, if you want to establish that I'm wrong here, you'll need to explain why. Sending me on a wild goose chase won't work anymore for your side, than if I were to tell you "Transgenderism is incoherent, and just watch all of Matt Walsh's videos if you want to know why".
    3
  5.  @nvna1111  "because your worldview includes denying medical research," Not at all. What statement have I made that goes against the research? "expert opinions," The problem with claiming that any of these people are experts on gender, is that they've consistently failed to even provide an objective, workable definition for "gender" to begin with. Hence, I've no reason to consider them gender experts (and neither do you). "literally every trans persons experience" What exact experience do you think proves their belief (that their gender is somehow different from their sex) is true or valid? "if you had a trans person in your life whom you loved," Why would you assume I don't? Again, disagreeing with someone's worldview does not imply you don't love them. And it's very irresponsible of you to suggest otherwise. "you would feel sick at the thought of misgendering them." It's actually not even possible to misgender anyone, on transgenderism. This is because those who subscribe to it can't even give objective definitions for terms like "man" or "woman" to begin with. You can't be correct or incorrect in using terms that have no objective definition. "you can quite literally know someone who passes and you dont know for years & then you find out theyre trans. what are you gonna do then?" Same as I would do if I had believed someone was a lawyer for years thanks to a counterfeit law degree, only to find out it was a fake. I'd adjust my behavior toward them accordingly. "you think you know better. of course you do." I could return this same silly protest your way. You also think you know better. Of course you do.
    2
  6. 2