Comments by "Vic 2.0" (@Vic2point0) on "With These Hands" video.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5.  @brendannyman7788  That's somewhat incoherent. How exactly does proof that when the government got involved in our healthcare industry, prices skyrocketed not undermine the idea of giving them even more control of it? Because as I see it, I've posted historic proof and recent data on the effects of Trump's appliance of free market principles, both strongly suggesting that opening up the market is the way to go. ​ @Hans R. There could be any number of reasons why the two can't be compared. Population size, unhealthy lifestyles, a corrupt government. But we know it isn't working, and the free market does. Are you guys really more heavily regulated? That's crazy because in the U.S. there were approx. 130,000 pages (PAGES!) of regulations applying to the healthcare industry alone in 2013. Doubtless the number has increased significantly since then. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1119841/ Another issue is that a lot of countries end up sacrificing quality and/or efficiency to make it "free". For example, major surgery under the U.K.’s healthcare system is four times more likely to kill you than the same services in the U.S. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-195277/NHS-death-rates-times-higher-US.html Wait times are also a major problem in the UK, with some actually being denied care. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/08/patients-suffering-direct-result-nhs-wait-time-failures There's even talk of them denying care on bases not relevant to scarcity. I have a hard time thinking the United States, with our uber-reactionary culture, wouldn't implement similar (or worse) ideas. https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/33955-uk-health-service-to-deny-treatment-to-patients-deemed-racist-or-sexist
    2
  6. 1
  7. 1